本文選題：環(huán)境相鄰權(quán)　切入點：環(huán)境保護　出處：《華南理工大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：人們在享受著歷經(jīng)科技革命的近現(xiàn)代工商業(yè)活動所帶來的舒適生活與各種便利的同時,也承受著現(xiàn)代工商業(yè)活動帶來的嚴重喧囂煩擾與侵害。在環(huán)境保護的視角下,與侵擾問題密切相關(guān)的相鄰關(guān)系領(lǐng)域產(chǎn)生了環(huán)境相鄰權(quán)理論,學者將這類基于環(huán)境保護的客觀要求而發(fā)生的一定范圍和限度內(nèi)的相鄰關(guān)系稱為環(huán)境相鄰權(quán)。對環(huán)境相鄰權(quán)的保護在我國民法中雖已有一定的體現(xiàn),但是,我國現(xiàn)有法律制度對環(huán)境相鄰權(quán)的保護仍存在一些問題,主要集中在損害賠償責任上。通過對照國外的立法,作者行文時針對在環(huán)境相鄰權(quán)賠償制度方面的缺陷,集中探究賠償責任的權(quán)源、學說、運作機制,以期使相鄰不動產(chǎn)權(quán)利人受到侵犯的環(huán)境相鄰權(quán)獲得圓滿救濟。本文擬從傳統(tǒng)相鄰權(quán)理論在面臨環(huán)境保護困境的現(xiàn)實中逐漸浸染了“綠”色的趨勢為前提出發(fā),討論和辨析相鄰權(quán)、環(huán)境侵權(quán)和環(huán)境相鄰權(quán)兩個概念的聯(lián)系和區(qū)別,并以環(huán)境相鄰權(quán)作為相鄰環(huán)境糾紛中對環(huán)境相鄰權(quán)人進行權(quán)利救濟的理論基礎(chǔ)。在比較國外相關(guān)保護制度的基礎(chǔ)上,基于環(huán)境相鄰權(quán)的特殊性,通過債權(quán)請求權(quán)的補充來避免物權(quán)保護手段的僵化刻板,設(shè)計和規(guī)劃我國侵犯環(huán)境相鄰權(quán)的損害賠償制度,提出賠償責任的初步構(gòu)想。
[Abstract]:People enjoy a modern industrial and commercial activities through scientific and technological revolution and comfortable life and all kinds of convenience, but also bear the serious noise annoyance and infringement of modern industrial and commercial activities. In the view of environmental protection, and is closely related to the intrusion of adjacent relations have created a theory of environmental adjacent right, scholars this kind of a certain range and the objective requirements of environmental protection based on and within the limits of the adjacent relation is called the adjacent rights. Protection of environmental adjacent right in civil law of our country has already had some, but China's current environmental protection adjacent legal system there are still some problems, mainly the liability for damages. Through the comparison of foreign legislation, the author aiming at the defects in the adjacent rights compensation system, centralized power source, explore the liability theory, operation mechanism, to The adjacent real property rights are violated satisfactorily adjacent rights relief. This paper starts from the traditional adjacent right theory in the face of environmental protection dilemma gradually disseminated the "green" color trend as the premise, discuss and analysis the relationship and difference between neighboring rights, environmental tort and environmental adjacent right two concepts the taking of environmental adjacent right as the theoretical basis of environmental disputes in the adjacent environmental adjacent right people for the right relief. Based on comparing the relevant foreign protection system, based on the particularity of environmental adjacent right, to avoid the rigid property protection method by adding the creditor's rights, planning and design of compensation system in our country the damage of environmental adjacent right infringement liability, put forward a preliminary idea.

【學位授予單位】：華南理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 韓光明;;民法上相鄰關(guān)系的界定——兼論法律概念的制作[J];北方法學;2008年05期

2 徐麗媛;;相鄰環(huán)境侵權(quán)及其法律救濟[J];城市問題;2012年04期

3 孫良國,周團結(jié);相鄰權(quán)問題三論[J];當代法學;2002年01期

4 鄭曉劍;;論建立開放的不可量物侵害救濟體系[J];東方法學;2011年03期

5 黃龍;;民事補償責任研究[J];廈門大學法律評論;2004年02期

6 趙紅梅,于文軒;環(huán)境權(quán)的法理念解析與法技術(shù)構(gòu)造——一種社會法的解讀[J];法商研究;2004年03期

7 李仁玉;吳萬軍;;地役權(quán)與相鄰關(guān)系[J];法學雜志;2006年04期

8 張平華;;不可量物侵害的私法救濟[J];法學雜志;2006年06期

9 李鵬;;論我國侵權(quán)責任法的公平責任[J];法學雜志;2010年11期

10 陳本寒;陳英;;公平責任歸責原則的再探討——兼評我國《侵權(quán)責任法》第24條的理解與適用[J];法學評論;2012年02期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前2條

1 李云波;相鄰不可量物排放關(guān)系的私法調(diào)整[D];復旦大學;2011年

2 孫磊;環(huán)境相鄰權(quán)研究[D];黑龍江大學;2014年

，

本文編號：1582561