本文選題：動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：登記對(duì)抗主義　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文基于中國(guó)當(dāng)前的法律規(guī)定,從動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)登記對(duì)抗的基本原理和構(gòu)造出發(fā),探討了動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)和其他類(lèi)型權(quán)利發(fā)生對(duì)抗時(shí)的權(quán)利優(yōu)先順位問(wèn)題,并以此來(lái)確定動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)登記對(duì)抗在我國(guó)法律實(shí)踐中的真實(shí)樣貌,并從應(yīng)然角度進(jìn)一步明確其理論內(nèi)涵和外延。文章分為四章。第一章簡(jiǎn)要概述動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)登記對(duì)抗的立法例。進(jìn)入現(xiàn)代后,動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)采用登記對(duì)抗主義的立法例較為常見(jiàn)。筆者簡(jiǎn)要介紹了法國(guó)、日本、美國(guó)、中國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū)和中國(guó)大陸關(guān)于登記對(duì)抗主義的立法現(xiàn)狀。第二章分析動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)登記對(duì)抗的基本理論。第一節(jié)介紹并分析日本法上登記對(duì)抗的多種理論構(gòu)造,并提出"第三人主張說(shuō)"是較為適合中國(guó)動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)登記對(duì)抗的理論構(gòu)造。第二節(jié)介紹了我國(guó)理論界對(duì)"對(duì)抗"一詞含義的理解,并認(rèn)為動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)和其他權(quán)利之間對(duì)抗的本質(zhì)是權(quán)利的優(yōu)先實(shí)現(xiàn)順位的問(wèn)題。第三節(jié)分析動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押登記的對(duì)抗力與公信力,并認(rèn)為動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)登記僅具有對(duì)抗力。最后提出動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)登記的對(duì)抗力和"第三人主張說(shuō)"是從法律關(guān)系的內(nèi)部和外部?jī)煞矫?內(nèi)外呼應(yīng)以實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)登記對(duì)抗的統(tǒng)一解釋。第四節(jié)分析了未登記的動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)的性質(zhì)。第三章宏觀分析第三人的范圍。第一節(jié)通過(guò)分析日本和我國(guó)關(guān)于第三人范圍的理論,提出動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)未登記不得對(duì)抗的第三人是指處于與抵押人的有效交易關(guān)系中,需要根據(jù)動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)登記與否確定權(quán)利優(yōu)先實(shí)現(xiàn)順位的人。第二節(jié)通過(guò)分析日本法上關(guān)于第三人主觀心態(tài)的學(xué)說(shuō)發(fā)展歷程,并結(jié)合我國(guó)的現(xiàn)狀和立法目的,認(rèn)為我國(guó)應(yīng)堅(jiān)持我國(guó)當(dāng)前法律對(duì)第三人"善意"的要求。第三節(jié)從抵押權(quán)登記與否的社會(huì)成本角度提出,當(dāng)前中國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)第三人的范圍做擴(kuò)張解釋,以限制未登記的動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)的效力,反向刺激登記,進(jìn)一步促進(jìn)動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)登記制度的完善。第四章詳細(xì)分析動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)和其他類(lèi)型權(quán)利發(fā)生對(duì)抗的多種具體情形。第一節(jié)分析認(rèn)為完全無(wú)權(quán)利人等與動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)人在法律上不發(fā)生權(quán)利對(duì)抗。第二節(jié)分析動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)與一般債權(quán),認(rèn)為與動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)人產(chǎn)生對(duì)抗的主要是破產(chǎn)債權(quán)人、扣押債權(quán)人、查封債權(quán)人等,并應(yīng)當(dāng)適用登記對(duì)抗。第三節(jié)分析動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)與租賃權(quán),認(rèn)為動(dòng)產(chǎn)不應(yīng)當(dāng)適用"買(mǎi)賣(mài)不破租賃",而應(yīng)適用動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)的登記對(duì)抗。第四節(jié)分析抵押物轉(zhuǎn)讓中的動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)。在抵押物轉(zhuǎn)讓的區(qū)分說(shuō)下,登記對(duì)抗只有在抵押權(quán)人不同意的情形才有些許發(fā)揮作用的空間。第五節(jié)分析動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)與他物權(quán)。動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)之間的對(duì)抗應(yīng)當(dāng)適用物權(quán)法第199條的特殊規(guī)定。動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)和質(zhì)權(quán)之間,不應(yīng)忽視質(zhì)權(quán)占有的公示作用。動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)和留置權(quán)之間,對(duì)商事留置權(quán)應(yīng)當(dāng)適用登記對(duì)抗;一般留置權(quán)應(yīng)當(dāng)以立法政策為導(dǎo)向,恒優(yōu)于動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)。筆者從法律實(shí)然的角度出發(fā),從具體的權(quán)利對(duì)抗中直觀地觀察動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)登記對(duì)抗的內(nèi)涵及外延。由于我國(guó)目前立法中的一些特殊利益考量、特殊權(quán)利性質(zhì)、以及立法規(guī)定的疏漏或過(guò)于概括等原因,登記對(duì)抗在動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押具體的權(quán)利對(duì)抗中并未得到充分適用。筆者的分析最終落腳于應(yīng)然角度,認(rèn)為動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)的登記對(duì)抗應(yīng)當(dāng)在動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)與其他權(quán)利發(fā)生對(duì)抗的大多數(shù)情形中得到適用。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the current legal provisions China based on the basic principle and the structure of chattels mortgage registration counter based on the chattel mortgage right and other rights type confrontation the rights of priority issues, and to determine the true appearance of chattel mortgage registration confrontation in our legal practice, and further clear the theoretical connotation and extension from the theoretical point of view. The article is divided into four chapters. The first chapter summarizes the chattel mortgage registration against the legislation. In the modern, chattel mortgage legislation by registration antagonism is more common. The author briefly describes the United States, France, Japan, on the legislative status of registration antagonism in Taiwan, Chinese and Chinese. The second chapter analysis the basic theory of real estate mortgage registration confrontation. The first section introduces and analyzes several theoretical structure of Japanese law registration confrontation, and put forward the "No. Three people say that "is more suitable for theoretical construction of chattel mortgage registration against the real China. The second section introduces the theory circle of our country" confrontation "to understand the meaning, and that the essence of confrontation between chattel mortgage and other rights are the rights of priority ranking problems. The third section analysis the resistance and the credibility of chattel mortgage registration, and that the chattel mortgage registration is only against the force. Finally put forward the chattel mortgage registration counter force and claim that" third "is from the two aspects of the legal relationship of internal and external, internal and external echo in order to achieve the real estate mortgage registration against the uniform interpretation. The fourth section analyzes the unregistered nature of real estate mortgage. Third Zhang Hongguan analysis of the scope of third people. The first section through theoretical analysis on the scope of the third Japan and China, the chattel mortgage registration shall not fight third Refers to the effective trading relationship is in and the mortgagor, according to the needs of the real estate mortgage registration or not determine the priority of rights realization of cis position. The second section through the analysis of Japanese law about Third People's subjective attitude theory development process, combined with the present situation of our country and the purpose of legislation, China should insist that I think our current law on the third "good faith" requirements. The third section from the mortgage registration and the social cost perspective whether the proposed scope of the current Chinese deal with third people do interpreted to limit the unregistered effect of chattel mortgage right, reverse stimulation and further improve the registration of chattel mortgage registration system. The fourth chapter detailed analysis of chattel mortgage and other types of rights against the specific circumstances vary. The first section analysis that no obligee and chattel mortgage rights in the law does not occur right against the second section. Analysis of chattel mortgage and general creditor's rights, and that mortgagee confrontation is mainly creditors, creditors and other creditors seized, seized, and shall be registered against. The third section analyzes the chattel mortgage and lease, that real estate should not apply to the lease sale, and shall apply chattel mortgage registration confrontation. The fourth section analysis in the transfer of mortgaged chattel mortgage. Distinction in the mortgaged property transfer said, only in the mortgage registration against the people do not agree with the situation that some space for the role. The fifth section analyzes the chattel mortgage and usufruct between chattel mortgage. Right against property law shall apply 199th special provisions. Between chattel mortgage and pledge, share pledge publicity effects should not be ignored. The chattel mortgage and lien, shall apply to the registration of commercial lien against a lien; Right to legislative policy oriented, constant is better than that of chattel mortgage. The author from the perspective of legal practice, the specific rights against the direct observation of dynamic connotation and extension of chattel mortgage registration counter. Because our country at present some special interest in the legislation of special considerations, rights of nature, and legislation too general omission or other reasons, the registration confrontation in chattel mortgage has not been specific rights against the full application. The author analysis eventually settled in the ideal perspective, think of chattel mortgage right shall be registered against most cases occurred in the confrontation of chattel mortgage rights and he applied.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 閻麗軍;;論我國(guó)動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押制度[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2008年11期

2 胡敬霖;;對(duì)我國(guó)動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押制度完善的若干建議[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年30期

3 矯強(qiáng)力;;中小企業(yè)動(dòng)產(chǎn)融資問(wèn)題淺析[J];時(shí)代金融;2014年09期

4 李江英;動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押擔(dān)保制度若干問(wèn)題探討[J];廣東農(nóng)工商管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

5 王磊;論我國(guó)動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押制度的現(xiàn)存缺陷及其完善[J];政治與法律;2001年05期

6 劉光;論動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押法律制度的完善[J];山東財(cái)政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年04期

7 王勇,方建偉;動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)初探及立法完善[J];行政與法;2002年01期

8 陳光;動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)設(shè)定的若干問(wèn)題研究[J];河南公安高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年03期

9 黃少彬,張旭;動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押與動(dòng)產(chǎn)質(zhì)押的比較研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2004年01期

10 姜述_",仇揚(yáng);淺析我國(guó)動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押登記制度存在的問(wèn)題及其完善[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2004年08期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 馬新 范崢;去年動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押融資增五成[N];江陰日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

2 高劍;動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押有助中小企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型[N];東莞日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

3 何俠民邋范崢;動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押解決企業(yè)融資難題[N];江陰日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

4 通訊員 周衛(wèi)征 記者 周愛(ài)明 實(shí)習(xí)生 邵茜;“動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押”登記數(shù)量連年減少[N];南京日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

5 劉建華　楊曉柳;發(fā)揮動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押登記職能 幫助企業(yè)解決融資難題[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2009年

6 柴士高邋曹廣清 武艷萍;開(kāi)辦動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押 助推企業(yè)發(fā)展[N];中華合作時(shí)報(bào);2008年

7 程建一;優(yōu)化動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押登記職能 打響工商特色服務(wù)品牌[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2009年

8 周平峰　韓先璜 崔雪;盱眙動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押登記助企融資逾2億[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2009年

9 本報(bào)記者 錢(qián)卓　通訊員 李培強(qiáng) 呂偉強(qiáng);“動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押”破解融資難題[N];青島日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

10 劉新華;贛榆工商動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押助農(nóng)企融資[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2009年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 劉玉杰;動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押法律制度研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2010年

2 董學(xué)立;美國(guó)動(dòng)產(chǎn)擔(dān)保制度研究[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

3 鄢夢(mèng)萱;中小企業(yè)間接融資法律問(wèn)題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 原君玉;動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2015年

2 胡永堅(jiān);中小企業(yè)動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押融資研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2015年

3 周恒;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保的法律定位[D];南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

4 李巍;農(nóng)戶(hù)動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押融資法律問(wèn)題探討[D];廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

5 李云龍;我國(guó)動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押制度的缺陷與完善[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2014年

6 孟慶一;特殊動(dòng)產(chǎn)的所有權(quán)變動(dòng)研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年

7 馬杰;未經(jīng)登記動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)的實(shí)現(xiàn)[D];西南科技大學(xué);2016年

8 張俊良;以動(dòng)產(chǎn)融資破解中小企業(yè)融資難題[D];上海交通大學(xué);2015年

9 耿鵬鵬;論動(dòng)產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)的登記對(duì)抗[D];山東大學(xué);2017年

10 李培培;動(dòng)產(chǎn)擔(dān)保融資—法與金融學(xué)視角[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1576673