本文選題：大規(guī)模侵權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：懲罰性賠償　出處：《北京交通大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：由于科技的不確定性,生產(chǎn)的大規(guī)模重復(fù)性以及企業(yè)的天然逐利性,當(dāng)代社會(huì)已經(jīng)成為高風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)。大規(guī)模侵權(quán)的頻繁發(fā)生,不僅給成千上萬的受害者的利益帶來?yè)p害,而且給社會(huì)整體利益帶來了沖擊。作為懸在企業(yè)頭頂?shù)摹斑_(dá)摩克利斯之劍”,懲罰性賠償制度能夠有效遏制大規(guī)模侵權(quán)的發(fā)生,并最大限度的彌補(bǔ)侵權(quán)造成的損害,安撫受害人,保護(hù)社會(huì)道德標(biāo)準(zhǔn),激勵(lì)社會(huì)對(duì)企業(yè)的監(jiān)管。懲罰性賠償制度有著悠久的歷史,在英美等判例法國(guó)家得以完善。作為成文法國(guó)家,我國(guó)對(duì)懲罰性賠償制度始終抱有謹(jǐn)慎的態(tài)度。目前我國(guó)《中華人民共和國(guó)侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第四十七條、《消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)法》的第五十五條和《中華人民共和國(guó)食品安全法》的第一百四十八條共同構(gòu)成了我國(guó)懲罰性賠償制度。但是我國(guó)的懲罰性賠償制度存在適用范圍過窄,懲罰是否適當(dāng)?shù)牡葐栴},需要進(jìn)一步完善。本文的目的是通過對(duì)懲罰性賠償?shù)恼?dāng)性、合理性進(jìn)行闡述,分析懲罰性賠償在大規(guī)模侵權(quán)中適用的迫切需要。同時(shí)比較兩大法系大規(guī)模侵權(quán)適用懲罰性賠償?shù)臓顩r,討論這項(xiàng)制度在我國(guó)的適用范圍和懲罰性賠償金的計(jì)算標(biāo)準(zhǔn),以期完善這項(xiàng)制度的適用。 本文分為四個(gè)部分,第一部分通過探討大規(guī)模侵權(quán)的含義和性質(zhì),從而限定懲罰性賠償?shù)倪m用范圍；第二部分主要探討大規(guī)模侵權(quán)案件中適用懲罰性賠償?shù)钠惹行耘c必要性；第三部分對(duì)兩大法系主要國(guó)家大規(guī)模侵權(quán)適用懲罰性賠償?shù)臓顩r進(jìn)行比較,討論這項(xiàng)制度在我國(guó)大規(guī)模侵權(quán)案件中的適用前景；第四部分討論大規(guī)模侵權(quán)案件中懲罰性賠償?shù)倪m用范圍以及賠償金的計(jì)算標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
[Abstract]:Due to the uncertainty of science and technology, natural interestbanking production scale and repeatability of enterprises, the contemporary society has become a high risk society. Frequent occurrence of mass tort, not only bring damage to tens of thousands of the interests of the victims, but also to the interests of the whole society has brought shock. As hanging in the corporate head "Damour Damocles" the punitive compensation system, can effectively curb the occurrence of mass torts, and the maximum for the damage caused by the infringement, to appease the victims, protect the social moral standard, social incentive of enterprise supervision. The punitive compensation system has a long history, has been improved in the Anglo American case law. Such as a civil law country, our country have always cautious attitude of punitive compensation system. At present our country < People's Republic of China tort law > forty-seventh, < > of consumer protection law 148th of the fifty-fifth People's Republic of China and "food safety law" constitute the punitive compensation system in our country. But the punitive damages system in our country there is too narrow, if appropriate punishment and other issues, the need for further improvement. The purpose of this paper is the legitimacy of punitive damages, rationality is expounded, the urgent analysis to apply the punitive compensation in mass tort. At the same time, comparing the two legal systems of mass tort of punitive damages, discuss this system in our country and the applicable scope of punitive damages calculation standard, in order to improve the application of this system.
This paper is divided into four parts, the first part through the discussion of the meaning and nature of mass tort, the scope and limit of punitive damages; the second part mainly discusses the urgency and necessity of the application of punitive damages in mass tort cases; third part is about the comparison of the two major countries of mass tort of punitive damages in application is discussed the prospect of this system in a large scale in China in case of tort; the fourth part discusses the scope of application of punitive damages in mass tort cases and calculation standard for compensation.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294;D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱巖;;大規(guī)模侵權(quán)的實(shí)體法問題初探[J];法律適用;2006年10期

2 張新寶;;設(shè)立大規(guī)模侵權(quán)損害救濟(jì)(賠償)基金的制度構(gòu)想[J];法商研究;2010年06期

3 浦川道太郎;;日本法上的懲罰性損害賠償與制裁性慰謝金[J];法學(xué)家;2001年05期

4 楊立新;;《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》應(yīng)對(duì)大規(guī)模侵權(quán)的舉措[J];法學(xué)家;2011年04期

5 石睿;;美德兩國(guó)懲罰性賠償之當(dāng)前發(fā)展[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年02期

6 王文潔;;論我國(guó)民法移植的問題[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年19期

7 韓培培;;論大規(guī)模侵權(quán)救濟(jì)機(jī)制[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年18期

8 李敏;;多元化救濟(jì)機(jī)制在大規(guī)模侵權(quán)損害中的建構(gòu)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年09期

9 張新寶;李倩;;懲罰性賠償?shù)牧⒎ㄟx擇[J];清華法學(xué);2009年04期

10 柯勁恒;;懲罰性賠償制度在大規(guī)模侵權(quán)中的適用分析[J];商業(yè)時(shí)代;2010年31期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳年冰;我國(guó)懲罰性賠償制度研究[D];山東大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1574259