本文選題：繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：性質(zhì)　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)《繼承法》第2條規(guī)定,繼承從被繼承人死亡時(shí)開始。同時(shí)《物權(quán)法》第29條規(guī)定：因繼承或者受遺贈(zèng)取得物權(quán)的,自繼承或者受遺贈(zèng)開始時(shí)發(fā)生效力。因此,自繼承開始之時(shí)起,繼承人即概括地取得被繼承人一切財(cái)產(chǎn)。但是此種取得,僅僅是觀念上的取得,而在實(shí)際上,繼承人未必對(duì)被繼承人的所有的遺產(chǎn)為實(shí)際上之占有、支配。在現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中,遺產(chǎn)受到侵害的情形是很常見的。為了更好地保護(hù)繼承人的繼承權(quán),有必要借鑒域外法,完善我國(guó)繼承法中的繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)的規(guī)定。 本文除了引言外,共分為五部分。 第一部分繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)概述。本部分主要從繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)的歷史沿革、概念界定和功能三個(gè)方面來進(jìn)行闡述。繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)源自羅馬法上的繼承訴,繼承訴是繼承人以繼承身份為基礎(chǔ)而提起的據(jù)以要求實(shí)際獲得死者財(cái)產(chǎn)的訴訟。其后,各國(guó)或地區(qū)立法,均繼受了羅馬法上的繼承訴制度。在概念界定上,眾說紛紜。本文認(rèn)為,繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)是繼承人于其繼承權(quán)受到侵害時(shí)享有的獨(dú)立的、包括的原狀回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)。同時(shí),繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)具有保護(hù)繼承人利益、節(jié)約訴訟資源和維護(hù)社會(huì)和平秩序的功能。 第二部分繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)的性質(zhì)以及與其他請(qǐng)求權(quán)的關(guān)系。關(guān)于繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)的性質(zhì),存在“繼承人地位回復(fù)說”、“遺產(chǎn)回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)說”、“繼承資格確認(rèn)與遺產(chǎn)回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)說”三種學(xué)說。本文傾向于“遺產(chǎn)回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)說”中的“獨(dú)立權(quán)利說”。至于繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)與物權(quán)請(qǐng)求權(quán)、損害賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán)的關(guān)系,本文認(rèn)為均是競(jìng)合的關(guān)系。 第三部分大陸法系主要國(guó)家及地區(qū)繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)立法及評(píng)析。本部分通過對(duì)這些國(guó)家及地區(qū)的立法狀況的介紹,以期為未來我國(guó)繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)的完善提供知識(shí)儲(chǔ)備和理論基礎(chǔ)。 第四部分繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)的構(gòu)成與行使。本文認(rèn)為繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)的要件有四。第一,無繼承權(quán)人已事實(shí)上占有遺產(chǎn)。第二,遺產(chǎn)占有人占有遺產(chǎn)沒有合法的根據(jù)。第三,提起繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求的權(quán)利人須是合法繼承人。第四,繼承權(quán)受到侵害是因?yàn)榉裾J(rèn)真正繼承人的繼承權(quán)而發(fā)生。至于繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)的行使,本文主要從行使主體、行使方式和行使效力三個(gè)方面展開論述。 第五部分繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)的完善。首先探討我國(guó)繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)的不足,然后結(jié)合國(guó)外立法和相關(guān)的理論研究得出我國(guó)立法完善的建議,擬出相關(guān)的法律條文。
[Abstract]:Article 2 of the inheritance Law of our country stipulates that inheritance shall begin at the time of the death of the deceased. Meanwhile, Article 29 of the Law of Real Rights stipulates that the acquisition of real rights by inheritance or bequest shall take effect from the beginning of the inheritance or bequest. Since the beginning of the succession, the heir has generally acquired all the property of the deceased... but such acquisition is merely a conceptual acquisition, and in practice the heir does not necessarily have actual possession of all the estate of the deceased, In order to better protect the heirs' inheritance, it is necessary to draw lessons from the extraterritorial law and perfect the provisions of inheritance reply claim in the inheritance law of our country. In addition to the introduction, this paper is divided into five parts. The first part is an overview of the claim right of succession reply. This part mainly expounds the history, concept definition and function of the claim of succession reply. The claim of succession reply originates from the succession action in Roman law. Succession action is an action brought by an heir on the basis of the status of succession to claim the actual acquisition of the property of the deceased. Subsequently, the legislation of various countries or regions has been followed by the succession action system in Roman law. This article holds that the claim for succession reply is an independent right of the heirs when their inheritance rights are infringed, including the right to claim in the original state. At the same time, the right of the claim of succession reply has the protection of the interests of the heirs. The function of saving litigation resources and maintaining social peace and order. The second part is about the nature of the claim of succession reply and its relationship with other claims. There are three kinds of theories: "claim of successor status", "claim right of inheritance reply", "claim of inheritance qualification and claim of estate reply". This paper tends to "independent right theory" in "claim of inheritance reply". The right of reply and the right of claim in real right, The relationship of claim for damages is considered to be the relationship of concurrence. The third part is the legislation and analysis of the right to claim for succession in the main countries and regions of the civil law system. This part introduces the legislative situation of these countries and regions. In order to provide the knowledge reserve and theoretical basis for the improvement of the right of inheritance and reply in the future. 4th part of the constitution and exercise of the claim of inheritance reply. This paper holds that there are four elements for the claim of succession reply. First, the person without inheritance has actually possessed the estate. Second, the possessor has no legal basis for the possession of the estate. Third, there is no legal basis for the possession of the estate by the person in possession of the inheritance. The obligee must be the legal heir. 4th, the right of inheritance is infringed because of the denial of the right of inheritance of the true heir. As for the exercise of the right of claim for reply of succession, this paper mainly discusses the subject of the right of claim. This paper discusses the mode of exercise and the effect of exercise. Part 5th the perfection of the claim right of succession reply. Firstly, this paper discusses the deficiency of the claim right of succession reply in our country, and then draws up the relevant legal provisions by combining with the foreign legislation and the relevant theoretical research to draw up the suggestion of perfecting the legislation of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D923.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 余延滿,冉克平;繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)研究[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年05期

2 樸正蘭;試論繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)的若干問題[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年12期

3 金錦城,宋建民;繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)之性質(zhì)研究[J];行政與法;2002年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 沈鎮(zhèn)友;繼承回復(fù)請(qǐng)求權(quán)研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1563253