本文關(guān)鍵詞： 過(guò)境貨物 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境保護(hù)措施 地域性　出處：《海南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)對(duì)外開放的進(jìn)一步深入,特別是近年來(lái)上海、廣東等自由貿(mào)易試驗(yàn)區(qū)的批準(zhǔn)設(shè)立,有關(guān)我國(guó)過(guò)境貨物的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境措施保護(hù)問(wèn)題變得越來(lái)越突出。但國(guó)內(nèi)關(guān)于過(guò)境貨物的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)問(wèn)題研究還處于空白階段。基于此,本文試在對(duì)有關(guān)國(guó)際條約進(jìn)行分析的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合相關(guān)司法實(shí)踐,并對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的基本理論進(jìn)行闡述,以期為我國(guó)的邊境保護(hù)措施法律完善提供一些愚見。 文章第一部分是對(duì)過(guò)境貨物知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境措施的基本概述,首先從國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)法條中總結(jié)出了過(guò)境貨物的定義,然后介紹了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境保護(hù)制度及其與過(guò)境貨物的關(guān)系,并指出目前國(guó)際社會(huì)對(duì)邊境保護(hù)措施是否應(yīng)適用過(guò)境貨物并沒有明確統(tǒng)一的定論。 第二部分分析了國(guó)際條約及有關(guān)文件對(duì)過(guò)境貨物邊境保護(hù)措施的規(guī)定。首先探討了GATT項(xiàng)下有關(guān)過(guò)境自由的規(guī)定,并得出其不能為過(guò)境國(guó)對(duì)過(guò)境貨物實(shí)施邊境保護(hù)措施提供國(guó)際法依據(jù)。其次,從立法宗旨、保護(hù)范圍、適用環(huán)節(jié)等方面詳細(xì)分析了TRIPS協(xié)定下的有關(guān)邊境措施規(guī)定,重點(diǎn)探討了TRIPS協(xié)定的立法初衷以及注解13把過(guò)境貨物排除在邊境保護(hù)措施在外的做法。隨后對(duì)目前國(guó)際上,TRIPS-plus的條約進(jìn)行了分析。從適用環(huán)節(jié)、準(zhǔn)據(jù)法適用、擔(dān)保制度及補(bǔ)救措施等方面詳細(xì)分析了ATCA對(duì)TRIPS協(xié)定下權(quán)利人和被申請(qǐng)人之間的平衡關(guān)系的破壞。緊接著介紹了目前正在談判中的的TPP談判中有關(guān)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的邊境執(zhí)法措施甚至明確將邊境措施的適用范圍擴(kuò)大至轉(zhuǎn)口貨物。最后得出知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)際保護(hù)的TRIPS-plus格局已經(jīng)成為各個(gè)國(guó)家必須面對(duì)的事實(shí)。 第三部分是過(guò)境貨物知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境措施的法理分析。首先,是對(duì)過(guò)境貨物法律性質(zhì)的分析,對(duì)當(dāng)前的“生產(chǎn)假設(shè)”和“域外假定”理論進(jìn)行了批判分析。其次,指出知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的私權(quán)性是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的理論基礎(chǔ),邊境措施作為對(duì)私權(quán)利的公權(quán)救濟(jì)手段,其合法性應(yīng)以私權(quán)為基礎(chǔ)的。另外,闡述了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境保護(hù)措施的實(shí)施應(yīng)尊重知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的地域性原則,最后,分析了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)昀法律適用問(wèn)題。 第四部分對(duì)我國(guó)的過(guò)境貨物邊境措施的完善提出建議。首先介紹了我國(guó)邊境措施的立法現(xiàn)狀,指出其存在的不足與僵化的地方。其后從平衡知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)與貿(mào)易自由的關(guān)系、適用條件、保護(hù)模式等方面對(duì)我國(guó)過(guò)境貨物邊境措施的完善提出建議。
[Abstract]:With the further deepening of China's opening to the outside world, especially in recent years, Shanghai, Guangdong and other free trade experimental areas have been approved and established. The protection of intellectual property border measures for transit goods in China has become more and more prominent. However, the domestic research on intellectual property protection of transit goods is still in a blank stage. Based on the analysis of the relevant international treaties and the relevant judicial practice, this paper expounds the basic theory of the protection of intellectual property rights in order to provide some humble opinions for the perfection of the law of the border protection measures in our country. The first part of the article is a basic overview of the border measures of intellectual property rights of goods in transit. Firstly, the definition of transit goods is summarized from the relevant domestic and foreign laws, and then the system of border protection of intellectual property rights and its relationship with transit goods are introduced. It is pointed out that there is no clear and uniform conclusion on whether border protection measures should be applied to transit goods in the international community. The second part analyzes the provisions of international treaties and related documents on border protection measures for goods in transit. First of all, it discusses the provisions on the freedom of transit under GATT. And it can not provide international legal basis for transit countries to implement border protection measures for transit goods. Secondly, the relevant border measures under the TRIPS Agreement are analyzed in detail from the aspects of legislative purpose, scope of protection, applicable links, etc. The legislative intent of the TRIPS Agreement and the practice of excluding goods in transit from border protection measures in Note 13 are discussed in detail. Subsequently, the current international treaties of TRIPS-plus are analyzed. In terms of application, applicable law is applied. This paper analyzes in detail the breach of the balance between the right holder and the respondent under the TRIPS Agreement by ATCA from the aspects of security system and remedies. Then it introduces the frontier of intellectual property rights in the TPP negotiation which is currently under negotiation. Law enforcement measures even explicitly extend the application of border measures to transit goods. Finally, the conclusion that the TRIPS-plus pattern of international protection of intellectual property rights has become a fact that every country must face. The third part is the legal analysis of border measures of intellectual property rights of transit goods. Firstly, it analyzes the legal nature of transit goods, and criticizes the current theories of "production hypothesis" and "extraterritorial hypothesis". It is pointed out that the private right of intellectual property is the theoretical basis of intellectual property, and border measures, as a means of public right relief to private rights, should be based on private rights. This paper expounds the regional principle of intellectual property rights should be respected in the implementation of intellectual property rights border protection measures, and finally, analyzes the legal application of intellectual property rights infringement. Part 4th puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of border measures for transit goods in China. Firstly, it introduces the current legislation of border measures in China, and points out their shortcomings and inflexibility. Then, it balances the relationship between the protection of intellectual property rights and the freedom of trade. Application conditions, protection model and other aspects of China's transit goods border measures to improve the recommendations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：海南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D922.221;D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 聶士海;;商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口在我國(guó)的實(shí)踐與爭(zhēng)議[J];今日財(cái)富(中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán));2010年08期

2 劉中偉;沈家文;;跨太平洋伙伴關(guān)系協(xié)議(TPP):研究前沿與架構(gòu)[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2012年01期

3 張乃根;;論WTO爭(zhēng)端解決的條約解釋[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年01期

4 朱瑪;;超TRIPS規(guī)則:ACTA背景下我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的邊境措施與應(yīng)對(duì)[J];對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào)實(shí)務(wù);2012年10期

5 嚴(yán)桂珍;;我國(guó)平行進(jìn)口法律規(guī)制情況——以商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口為視角[J];今日財(cái)富(中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán));2010年08期

6 姜文學(xué);;TPP在美國(guó)重塑國(guó)際貿(mào)易秩序中的雙重功能[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;2012年12期

7 杜穎;;中國(guó)(上海)自由貿(mào)易試驗(yàn)區(qū)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的構(gòu)想[J];法學(xué);2014年01期

8 丁偉;;中國(guó)(上海)自由貿(mào)易試驗(yàn)區(qū)法制保障的探索與實(shí)踐[J];法學(xué);2013年11期

9 晏凌煜;唐春;;中國(guó)(上海)自由貿(mào)易試驗(yàn)區(qū)內(nèi)涵及其涉及的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)問(wèn)題初析[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年02期

10 楊靜;;基于內(nèi)生需求與外向視野的上海自貿(mào)區(qū)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)構(gòu)想[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1509917