【摘要】：對(duì)派遣勞動(dòng)者致人損害的賠償責(zé)任,《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第34條第2款的規(guī)定不盡合理:一是賠償責(zé)任主體,無論根據(jù)私法上的雇主責(zé)任理論,還是勞動(dòng)法上的勞務(wù)派遣制度,均應(yīng)將派遣單位與用工單位界定為共同的責(zé)任主體;二是歸責(zé)原則,派遣單位與用工單位構(gòu)成共同的用人單位,應(yīng)統(tǒng)一適用無過錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則;三是責(zé)任形態(tài),派遣單位應(yīng)與用工單位承擔(dān)連帶賠償責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:Article 34, paragraph 2, of the Tort liability Law provides that the liability for damages caused by dispatched workers is not entirely reasonable: first, the subject of compensation liability, whether according to the theory of employer's liability in private law or the system of labor dispatch in labor law, Should define the sending unit and the employment unit as the common responsibility subject; Second, the principle of imputation, the dispatch unit and the employment unit constitute the common employing unit, should apply the principle of no-fault liability uniformly; third, the responsibility form, the dispatch unit should bear the joint and several liability with the employment unit.
【作者單位】： 西南政法大學(xué)民商法學(xué)院;
【基金】：重慶市沙坪壩區(qū)人民法院重點(diǎn)課題:“侵權(quán)補(bǔ)充責(zé)任研究”之階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：D923
，

本文編號(hào)：2430094