【摘要】：企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)是企業(yè)保障生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)秩序，實(shí)現(xiàn)既定生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)目標(biāo)的需要。企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)與勞動(dòng)者權(quán)益密不可分，企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)一旦被濫用就會(huì)侵害勞動(dòng)者權(quán)益。因此，各國(guó)對(duì)企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)的行使進(jìn)行必要限制，防止企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)濫用，減少化解企業(yè)與勞動(dòng)者之間的矛盾，平衡雙方當(dāng)事人利益。我國(guó)現(xiàn)行勞動(dòng)法體系中有關(guān)企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)的規(guī)定存在諸多缺陷，理論界對(duì)企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)的研究不能很好滿足現(xiàn)實(shí)的需要，理論滯后于實(shí)踐。本文在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)與企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)濫用的成因及其企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)濫用防范進(jìn)行了分析，對(duì)有效防范我國(guó)企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)濫用的法律對(duì)策提出了構(gòu)想，旨在為我國(guó)未來(lái)防范企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)濫用立法和司法實(shí)踐有所啟迪。 除引言和結(jié)語(yǔ)外，，本文共分三章。 第一章企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)與企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)濫用。本章主要分析了企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)存在的必要性、從不同角度分析企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)的涵義并對(duì)企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)的性質(zhì)、分類及其功能進(jìn)行了分析。同時(shí)，借鑒西方國(guó)家關(guān)于權(quán)利濫用的界定對(duì)企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)濫用的特征、表現(xiàn)、危害及原因進(jìn)一步闡述。 第二章我國(guó)對(duì)企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)濫用的防范和處理。本章主要分析我國(guó)企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)濫用防范和處理的法律依據(jù)、我國(guó)企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)濫用的防范和處理存在的問(wèn)題及我國(guó)企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)濫用的防范和處理存在問(wèn)題的原因。 第三章有效防范我國(guó)企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)濫用的法律對(duì)策。本章從健全企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)制度本身，保障我國(guó)企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)制度依法實(shí)施和企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)濫用監(jiān)察和責(zé)任追究制度等方面，對(duì)規(guī)范我國(guó)企業(yè)懲戒權(quán)行使提出了具體建議。
[Abstract]:The right of punishment is the need for enterprises to ensure the order of production and management and to realize the established objectives of production and management. The right of punishment is closely related to the rights and interests of workers. Once the right of punishment is abused, it will infringe upon the rights and interests of workers. Therefore, it is necessary to restrict the exercise of enterprise disciplinary power in various countries, prevent the abuse of enterprise disciplinary power, reduce the contradiction between enterprises and workers, and balance the interests of both parties. There are many defects in the regulations of the enterprise disciplinary power in the current labor law system of our country. The theoretical research on the enterprise disciplinary power can not meet the needs of reality, and the theory lags behind the practice. On the basis of previous studies, this paper analyzes the causes of the abuse of corporate disciplinary power and the abuse of corporate disciplinary power, and puts forward some legal countermeasures to effectively prevent the abuse of corporate disciplinary power in our country. The purpose of this paper is to enlighten the legislation and judicial practice of preventing the abuse of disciplinary power in our country in the future. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into three chapters. Chapter one: corporate disciplinary power and abuse of corporate disciplinary power. This chapter mainly analyzes the necessity of the existence of enterprise disciplinary power, analyzes the meaning of enterprise disciplinary power from different angles, and analyzes the nature, classification and function of enterprise disciplinary power. At the same time, drawing lessons from the definition of abuse of rights in western countries, the characteristics, performance, harm and reasons of abuse of disciplinary power in enterprises are further elaborated. The second chapter is about how to prevent and deal with the abuse of corporate disciplinary power in our country. This chapter mainly analyzes the legal basis for the prevention and treatment of the abuse of disciplinary power in Chinese enterprises, the problems in preventing and dealing with the abuse of disciplinary power in Chinese enterprises, and the reasons for preventing and dealing with the existing problems in the abuse of disciplinary power in Chinese enterprises. The third chapter effectively prevents our country enterprise discipline right abuse legal countermeasure. From the aspects of perfecting the system of enterprise disciplinary power itself, ensuring the implementation of the system of corporate disciplinary power according to law and the system of supervision and accountability for the abuse of corporate disciplinary power, this chapter puts forward some concrete suggestions for standardizing the exercise of the right to discipline of enterprises in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馮彥君;;勞動(dòng)合同解除中的“三金”適用——兼論我國(guó)《勞動(dòng)合同法》的立法態(tài)度[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2006年05期

2 馮彥君;;我國(guó)勞動(dòng)合同立法應(yīng)正確處理三大關(guān)系[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2006年06期

3 董保華;;勞動(dòng)法的國(guó)家觀——?jiǎng)趧?dòng)合同立法爭(zhēng)鳴的深層思考[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2006年06期

4 常凱;;關(guān)于《勞動(dòng)合同法》立法的幾個(gè)基本問(wèn)題[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2006年06期

5 陳榮文;;論完善我國(guó)勞動(dòng)紀(jì)律處分制度的幾個(gè)重要問(wèn)題[J];福建論壇(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年12期

6 林嘉;;社會(huì)法在構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)中的使命[J];法學(xué)家;2007年02期

7 孫國(guó)華;;論法的和諧價(jià)值[J];法學(xué)家;2008年05期

8 丁華;;勞動(dòng)紀(jì)律及懲戒問(wèn)題的思考[J];中國(guó)勞動(dòng);2011年07期

9 劉金祥;;多元化路徑:我國(guó)勞資關(guān)系調(diào)整模式的反思和重構(gòu)[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)研究;2011年01期

10 彭騰;;論我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段的“強(qiáng)資本”與“弱勞動(dòng)”[J];蘭州商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 丁建安;企業(yè)勞動(dòng)規(guī)章的法律效力研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：2217375