發(fā)布時間：2018-06-06 12:59

  本文選題：工傷保險賠償 + 民事侵權賠償��； 參考：《復旦大學》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 現(xiàn)代社會中,人們聚集在工廠、建筑工地等場所共同勞動,機器成為主要生產(chǎn)工具。隨著技術、經(jīng)濟的迅猛發(fā)展,工傷事故的發(fā)生日漸頻繁且后果日益嚴重,成為現(xiàn)代社會嚴重的社會問題。工傷損害救濟機制已由原先的一元化逐漸向多元化發(fā)展,涉及侵權行為法和社會保險法等多個領域,形成多種制度并存的局面。尤其是工傷保險賠償與民事侵權賠償之間適用關系的處理問題,因關系到勞動者、用人單位、其他侵權人、社會保險經(jīng)辦機構等多方利益,而似乎難以調和兼顧。目前各國解決工傷保險賠償與民事侵權賠償之間適用關系問題的方法主要有選擇、免除、兼得和補充四種模式。本文認為,任何一種模式的適用都不存在法理上的障礙,只是每種模式適用的環(huán)境不同、看待分析每種模式的角度不同和選擇每種模式所追求的價值取向不同而已。 在我國,相關的立法對工傷保險賠償與民事侵權賠償?shù)倪m用關系雖有一些規(guī)定,但法條之間還是存在明顯的矛盾,給司法實踐帶來了諸多困難,出現(xiàn)“各依各的規(guī)定,各判各的案件”的現(xiàn)象。因此,在分析有關理論的基礎上,研究工傷保險賠償與民事侵權賠償?shù)倪m用關系并提出完善我國適用方面的法律制度是本文的核心和歸宿。 本文將從分析工傷事故的性質、研究工傷責任的演變著手,分析比對兩種賠償?shù)膮^(qū)別與聯(lián)系,具體闡述工傷保險賠償與民事侵權賠償之間的適用關系,并結合我國的現(xiàn)實國情及未來發(fā)展,提出在我國無論是在(第三人侵權引致的)用人單位無因性工傷事故中還是在(用人單位負有故意或重大過失情形的)用人單位有因性工傷事故中,在工傷保險賠償與侵權損害賠償適用的關系上,都可采用兼得模式。分析兼得模式的理論基礎,其適用既不違背侵權法中的損益相抵原則,也不違背保險法中的禁止得利原則；且兼得模式的適用既是對生命權和人權特別保護的體現(xiàn),也是適應我國國情和索賠效率的需要。
[Abstract]:In modern society, people gather in factories, construction sites and other places to work together, machines become the main means of production. With the rapid development of technology and economy, the occurrence of industrial accidents is becoming more and more frequent and the consequences are becoming more and more serious, which has become a serious social problem in modern society. The mechanism of compensation for injury at work has gradually developed from the original monism to the diversification, involving the tort law and the social insurance law and other fields, forming a situation of coexistence of various systems. Especially the problem of dealing with the applicable relationship between industrial injury insurance compensation and civil tort compensation is difficult to reconcile with the interests of workers, employing units, other infringers, social insurance agencies and so on. At present, there are four ways to solve the problem of the applicable relationship between the compensation of industrial injury insurance and the compensation of civil tort in various countries, such as choice, exemption, acquirement and supplement. This paper holds that there are no legal obstacles to the application of any one of the models, except that each model is applied in a different environment, the angle of analysis of each model is different and the value orientation of choosing each model is different. In our country, although there are some provisions on the applicable relationship between industrial injury insurance compensation and civil tort compensation in relevant legislation, there are still obvious contradictions between the provisions of the law, which bring many difficulties to the judicial practice. The phenomenon of each case being adjudicated. Therefore, on the basis of the analysis of relevant theories, it is the core and end-result of this paper to study the applicable relationship between the compensation of industrial injury insurance and the compensation for civil tort and to put forward the perfection of the legal system of our country's application. This article will analyze the nature of industrial injury accident, study the evolution of industrial injury liability, analyze the difference and relation between the two kinds of compensation, and expound the applicable relationship between the compensation of industrial injury insurance and the compensation of civil tort. And combined with the reality of our country and its future development, It is proposed that in China, whether in the case of an employer's uncaused industrial injury (caused by the infringement of a third party) or in a situation where the employing unit has intentional or gross negligence, the employer has a work-related injury as a result of the accident. In the industrial injury insurance compensation and tort damages applicable to the relationship, both can adopt a concurrent mode. The application of this model is not contrary to the principle of profit or loss in tort law, nor to the principle of prohibition of gain and gain in insurance law, and the application of the model is the embodiment of the special protection of the right to life and human rights. It is also the need to adapt to the situation of our country and the efficiency of claims.
【學位授予單位】：復旦大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D922.55

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前6條

1 呂琳;工傷保險與民事賠償適用關系研究[J];法商研究;2003年03期

2 曹艷春;工傷保險與民事侵權賠償適用關系的理性選擇[J];法律適用;2005年05期

3 余綺彤;;工傷賠償制度的司法實踐及法律思考[J];廣東技術師范學院學報;2005年05期

4 董溯戰(zhàn);德國、法國工傷保險法律制度的比較研究[J];寧夏社會科學;2004年05期

5 王建軍;;工傷認定:行政與司法的沖突及消除[J];社會科學研究;2007年02期

6 袁滿君,陳林林;超越事實與規(guī)范的學理──雇傭合同工傷賠償?shù)臍w責原則與過錯概念評析[J];浙江省政法管理干部學院學報;2000年03期

相關碩士學位論文 前8條

1 芮立新;論工傷保險與侵權賠償?shù)年P系[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿易大學;2003年

2 李國陽;工傷侵權責任研究[D];鄭州大學;2005年

3 馮梅;工傷賠償制度的理性選擇[D];四川大學;2005年

4 劉浩;我國工傷保險賠償制度問題研究[D];安徽大學;2006年

5 涂俊;工傷救濟懲罰性賠償研究[D];四川大學;2006年

6 邊境;論工傷賠償與民事人身傷害賠償?shù)母偤蟍D];湖南大學;2007年

7 李倩;工傷損害賠償制度研究[D];中央民族大學;2007年

8 王靜;工傷賠償法律適用研究[D];中國政法大學;2007年

，

本文編號：1986605