本文選題：勞動規(guī)章制度 + 效力來源��； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：用人單位勞動規(guī)章制度作為協(xié)調(diào)勞動關(guān)系的有效規(guī)則,對于建立和維護單位內(nèi)部秩序,明確勞動關(guān)系雙方權(quán)利與義務(wù),促進勞動關(guān)系的和諧穩(wěn)定具有重要意義。合法有效的規(guī)章制度對于用人單位及全體勞動者均具有約束力,然而用人單位制定勞動規(guī)章制度的正當(dāng)性何在?勞動規(guī)章制度的效力究竟來源于何處?其生效要件如何?如何對其效力進行認定?目前學(xué)界對這些問題的回答莫衷一是,理論上的研究不夠系統(tǒng),專著甚少;我國勞動立法對上述問題的規(guī)定也不夠明確和全面,使得在處理勞動爭議案件的司法實踐中缺乏明確統(tǒng)一的依據(jù),往往造成司法判決的不一致。筆者正是基于以上考慮,在總結(jié)前面學(xué)者研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上,借鑒發(fā)達國家和地區(qū)對于該制度的立法和實踐經(jīng)驗,采用理論聯(lián)系實際和比較分析的方法,試圖對勞動規(guī)章制度效力領(lǐng)域的有關(guān)問題進行較為全面的探析。 本文共分為引言、正文、結(jié)語三大部分,其中正文包括四章。 第一章是用人單位制定勞動規(guī)章制度的正當(dāng)性分析。本章首先界定并分析了勞動規(guī)章制度與相關(guān)概念;然后從用人單位的權(quán)利義務(wù)與企業(yè)實現(xiàn)經(jīng)營自主權(quán)的需要兩個角度闡釋了用人單位制定規(guī)章制度的正當(dāng)性。 第二章探究了勞動規(guī)章制度的效力來源。本章首先介紹了目前學(xué)界關(guān)于勞動規(guī)章制度效力來源的主流學(xué)說,而后逐一分析了各種學(xué)說,指出筆者更傾向于格式條款說,即認為勞動規(guī)章制度作為勞動合同的附件,或稱為格式條款,其效力來源于勞動合同,最后闡述了筆者支持該學(xué)說的幾點理由。 第三章概括了勞動規(guī)章制度的效力表現(xiàn)。本章首先從對人效力,空間效力和時間效力三個方面對勞動規(guī)章制度的效力范圍作了說明;然后對勞動規(guī)章制度、勞動合同和集體合同三者間的效力層級作了分析。 第四章是勞動規(guī)章制度效力的認定。在前幾章對勞動規(guī)章制度的效力來源、效力范圍、效力層級的論述基礎(chǔ)之上,本章重點探討了其生效要件及其效力規(guī)制。首先介紹分析了外國典型勞動立法的有關(guān)規(guī)定,在此基礎(chǔ)上重點探討了我國勞動規(guī)章制度應(yīng)具備的生效要件,即制定主體適格,內(nèi)容合法、合理,程序合法。其中筆者用大量筆墨分析了勞動規(guī)章制定程序中的決定程序究竟為“單決模式”還是“共決模式”。然后對如何規(guī)制勞動規(guī)章制度的效力作了嘗試性的探討。
[Abstract]:The labor rules and regulations of employing units are effective rules for coordinating labor relations. It is of great significance to establish and maintain internal order in units, to clear the rights and obligations of both parties in labor relations and to promote the harmony and stability of labor relations. What is the legitimacy of the labor rules and regulations? Where does the effectiveness of the labor rules and regulations come from? How do they take effect? How to determine their effectiveness? At present, the answers to these questions are quite different from those in the academic circles. The theoretical research is not systematic and the monographs are scarce; the provisions of our labor legislation on the above problems are not clear enough. And overall, the lack of a clear and unified basis for judicial practice in dealing with labor disputes often causes disagreement of judicial decisions. Based on the above considerations, the author, on the basis of summarizing the research results of the previous scholars, draws on the legislative and practical experience of the developed countries and regions for the system, and adopts the theory to connect with the reality and the practice. The method of comparative analysis tries to conduct a more comprehensive analysis of the relevant issues in the field of effectiveness of labor rules and regulations.
This article is divided into three parts, the introduction, the main body and the conclusion. The body contains four chapters.
The first chapter is the analysis of the legitimacy of the labor rules and regulations formulated by the employer. Firstly, this chapter defines and analyzes the labor rules and regulations and related concepts, and then explains the legitimacy of the enacted rules and regulations of the Employer from two angles of the rights and obligations of the employer and the needs of the enterprise to realize the management autonomy.
The second chapter explores the source of the effectiveness of the labor rules and regulations. This chapter first introduces the mainstream theory of the source of the effectiveness of the labor rules and regulations, and then analyzes the various theories, and points out that the author is more inclined to form terms, that is, the labor rules and regulations are attached to the labor contract, or form terms, and their effectiveness. It comes from the labor contract, and finally expounds several reasons why the author supports this theory.
The third chapter summarizes the effectiveness of labor rules and regulations. This chapter first illustrates the effectiveness of labor rules and regulations from three aspects of human effectiveness, space effectiveness and time effectiveness, and then analyses the effectiveness level of labor rules and regulations, labor contracts and collective contracts between the three parties.
The fourth chapter is the identification of the effectiveness of labor rules and regulations. In the first few chapters, on the basis of the effectiveness of the labor rules and regulations, the scope of effectiveness and the level of effectiveness, this chapter focuses on its effective requirements and its effectiveness regulation. First, it introduces and analyzes the relevant provisions of the foreign typical labor legislation, and on this basis focuses on the study of China's labor. The effective elements of the rules and regulations, that is, make the main body fit, the content is legitimate, reasonable and the procedure is legal. The author uses a large number of ink and ink to analyze whether the decision procedure in the labor rules and regulations is "single decision mode" or "common pattern". Then, the author tries to discuss how to regulate the effectiveness of labor rules and regulations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.5

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 程延園;;勞動合同立法如何平衡勞動者與企業(yè)的權(quán)益[J];法學(xué)雜志;2007年03期

2 高圣平;;用人單位勞動規(guī)章制度的性質(zhì)辨析——兼評《勞動合同法(草案)》的相關(guān)條款[J];法學(xué);2006年10期

，

本文編號：1945082