本文選題：勞動爭議仲裁時效　切入點：事實勞動關系　出處：《蘭州大學》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：隨著我國經濟的高速發(fā)展,越來越多的農村富余勞動力轉移到城市就業(yè),出現了農民工這一特殊群體。農民工群體日益成為我國勞動力市場的一大生力軍,為推進我國的工業(yè)化、城鎮(zhèn)化、現代化發(fā)展發(fā)揮了巨大作用。但是由于傳統戶籍制度的影響,導致農民工在城市受到很多偏見和歧視。絕大多數農民工只能從事城市人不愿干的工作,工作環(huán)境極其惡劣,缺乏必要的勞動保護設施。有些用人單位從不與他們簽訂勞動合同,拖欠工資、超時、節(jié)假日加班等侵犯勞動者合法權益的現象屢見不鮮。本案就是其中的縮影。本案原告陳進等人一方面由于我國勞動爭議時效存在不完善的地方,國有企業(yè)改制的監(jiān)管不力,“逆向”派遣等原因造成了原告合法權益受到侵害,另一方面由于社會保障體系、勞務派遣等制度的不完善,勞動監(jiān)察監(jiān)督執(zhí)法不嚴等問題,造成農民工合法權利得不到有效救濟。因此本文對這些問題進行了深入的探討和思考,希望從法律、政府、社會以及個人等方面保障農民工的合法權益提出了個人觀點。 本文首先論述了本案出現的上述問題以及筆者的對這些問題的法律分析及思考。第一章首先對陳進等農民工勞動爭議案件的基本案情進行了詳細介紹,對案件的事實、法院判決以及爭議焦點進行了簡單梳理,為下文筆者對案件的爭議焦點進行分析做好了鋪墊。 第二章先后對本案涉及到的勞動爭議時效問題,國有企業(yè)改制后的法律責任,事實勞動關系和勞務派遣等法律問題進行了詳細分析。首先,通過分析《勞動爭議仲裁調解法》是否具有溯及力以及勞動爭議發(fā)生之日的不同理解,來說明在司法實踐中對勞動爭議仲裁時效應從保護處于弱勢地位的勞動者角度出發(fā)。然后從法律法規(guī)、政策精神及“利益相關者”理論出發(fā)分析了國有企業(yè)改制后應承擔的法律責任,并對國有企業(yè)改制中如何保護勞動者勞動權的提出了一些具體措施。之后通過對本案事實、事實勞動關系特點、勞務派遣三方主體之間的性質和“逆向”派遣本質分析得出雙方存在事實勞動關系而不是勞務關系的結論。最后從上述分析得出保護事實勞動的重要性和用工單位和勞動者之間適用雙重勞動關系說但在具體操作中應保持相對公平的重要原則,從而實現勞務派遣主體三方共贏局面,避免如本案一樣以“逆向”派遣方式侵犯勞動者權益的問題再次出現。 第三章揭示出本案所折射出的農民工權益保障缺失的社會問題,并從案件所反映的問題作為出發(fā)點對完善勞動仲裁時效制度、勞務派遣制度和社會保障制度,實行行政獎勵制度,加強勞動監(jiān)察部門執(zhí)法力度等方面提出了一些看法和建議。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of China's economy, more and more rural surplus labor force has been transferred to urban employment, and a special group of migrant workers has emerged. Migrant workers have increasingly become a major force in China's labor market. In order to promote the industrialization, urbanization and modernization of our country, it has played a great role. However, due to the influence of the traditional household registration system, This has led to a lot of prejudice and discrimination against migrant workers in the city. The vast majority of migrant workers can only do jobs that city people do not want to do, and the working environment is extremely poor. Lack of necessary labor protection facilities. Some employers never sign labor contracts with them. Overtime on holidays and other violations of the legitimate rights and interests of workers are common. This case is a microcosm. Chen Jin, the plaintiff, on the one hand, is imperfect because of the limitation of labor disputes in our country. The poor supervision of the reform of the state-owned enterprises, the "reverse" dispatch and other causes have caused the plaintiff's legitimate rights and interests to be infringed upon. On the other hand, due to the imperfections of the social security system and the labor dispatch system, and the lax enforcement of the labor supervision and supervision laws, and so on, Therefore, this paper makes a deep discussion and reflection on these problems, hoping to protect the legitimate rights and interests of migrant workers from the legal, government, social and personal aspects. This paper first discusses the above problems in this case and the author's legal analysis and reflection on these problems. The first chapter introduces in detail the basic facts of the cases of migrant workers such as Chen Jin, and the facts of the cases. The court judgment and the focus of the dispute were simply combed, which paved the way for the author to analyze the dispute focus of the case. The second chapter has carried on the detailed analysis to the labor dispute prescription question, the state-owned enterprise legal responsibility after the reform, the fact labor relations and the labor dispatch and so on legal question. By analyzing whether the Labor dispute Arbitration Mediation Law has retroactive effect and the different understanding of the date of labor dispute, To illustrate that in judicial practice, the statute of limitations for arbitration of labor disputes should proceed from the point of view of protecting workers in a weak position. Then, from the perspective of laws and regulations, The spirit of the policy and the theory of "stakeholder" analyze the legal responsibility of the state-owned enterprises after restructuring, and put forward some concrete measures to protect the labor rights of the workers in the process of the reform of the state-owned enterprises. Then, through the facts of the case, the author puts forward some concrete measures to protect the labor rights of the workers in the reform of the state-owned enterprises. The characteristics of factual labor relations, The analysis of the nature and the "reverse" nature of the tripartite subjects of labor dispatch draws the conclusion that there is a factual labor relationship rather than a labor relationship between the two parties. Finally, the importance of protecting factual labor and the employment order are drawn from the above analysis. The important principle that the dual labor relationship theory should be applied between the worker and the worker, but the relative fairness should be maintained in the concrete operation, In order to realize the tripartite win-win situation of the main body of labor dispatch and avoid the problem of infringing workers' rights and interests in the way of "reverse" dispatch as in this case. The third chapter reveals the social problems of the lack of protection of the rights and interests of migrant workers reflected in this case, and from the point of view of the problems reflected in the case as a starting point to improve the system of limitation of labor arbitration, labor dispatch system and social security system. This paper puts forward some opinions and suggestions on implementing the administrative reward system and strengthening the law enforcement of labor inspection departments.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.5

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 朱行軍;張琴;;事實勞動關系探析[J];重慶工商大學學報(社會科學版);2006年05期

2 王全興;;勞動派遣是“雞刀”還是“牛刀”——我國勞動派遣的現實本質及其矯正[J];當代法學;2006年06期

3 馮彥君;;公司分立與勞動權保障——我國應確立勞動契約承繼制度[J];法學家;2005年05期

4 周蓓;;論應適當延長我國勞動爭議仲裁時效[J];湖北經濟學院學報(人文社會科學版);2006年03期

5 秦文獻;;“逆向勞務派遣”有效論[J];廣西社會科學;2010年10期

6 李長健;論勞動關系的異化——兼論事實勞動關系與勞務關系的區(qū)別[J];華中農業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2004年04期

7 王全興,侯玲玲;勞動關系雙層運行的法律思考——以我國的勞動派遣實踐為例[J];中國勞動;2004年04期

8 ;企業(yè)改制中勞動關系法律適用疑難問題討論[J];中國勞動;2004年08期

9 殷曼麗,蔣偉;企業(yè)改制中的勞動爭議問題探討[J];中國勞動;2005年09期

10 王艷麗;;淺議勞動仲裁時效制度的完善[J];南京審計學院學報;2006年02期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 肖蓓;企業(yè)并購中勞動者勞動權保護法律問題研究[D];華中師范大學;2010年

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 羅希;我國勞務派遣法律制度研究[D];西南政法大學;2008年

2 趙艷艷;勞動爭議仲裁時效制度研究[D];中國政法大學;2008年

3 方偉;農民工權益保障問題研究[D];長春理工大學;2009年

，

本文編號：1620503