網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺提供商法律問題研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-04-11 18:36
【摘要】：互聯(lián)網(wǎng)時代人們的多元化需求促使傳統(tǒng)交易模式不斷轉(zhuǎn)型,通過電子信息技術(shù)建立新秩序的網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺應(yīng)運而生。網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺是指電子商務(wù)活動中為雙方或多方提供交易撮合及相關(guān)服務(wù)的信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)系統(tǒng)總和,其在網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易過程中地位十分重要。面對當(dāng)前我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)購物市場存在的商品質(zhì)量、價金支付、合同條款、商品配送等不同類型的糾紛,規(guī)范網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易秩序的相關(guān)制度急需建立。網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺提供商作為連接各方交易主體的紐帶,其法律地位、權(quán)利義務(wù)、責(zé)任承擔(dān)等一系列法律問題也成為討論熱點。目前,對于網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺提供商法律問題的相關(guān)研究仍處于摸索階段,學(xué)者觀點爭議性較大且結(jié)論不一。筆者結(jié)合不同的平臺模式分析平臺提供商、產(chǎn)品(服務(wù))提供者和消費者三方法律關(guān)系,并在此基礎(chǔ)之上構(gòu)建三方權(quán)責(zé)系統(tǒng),旨在促進平臺走向規(guī)范化、合理化。本文通過案例分析法、文獻研究法、比較分析法等多種方法的使用,圍繞網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺提供商這一中心,分析了學(xué)界現(xiàn)存的關(guān)于平臺提供商法律地位的六種學(xué)說,提出了平臺提供商新型中介地位的觀點；首次區(qū)分討論了B to C和C to C模式中平臺提供商與產(chǎn)品(服務(wù))提供者、消費者的法律關(guān)系,結(jié)合平臺購物流程,明確各階段不同主體間的法律關(guān)系；逐一分析了平臺提供商、產(chǎn)品(服務(wù))提供者、消費者的權(quán)利義務(wù)范圍,著重論述了平臺提供商的審查注意義務(wù)；分析了平臺提供商的法律責(zé)任,主要探討民事責(zé)任中的違約責(zé)任和侵權(quán)責(zé)任,尤其是民事責(zé)任中平臺提供商間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任,認為平臺提供商承擔(dān)商標權(quán)間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任需滿足平臺用戶存在侵權(quán)行為,平臺提供商構(gòu)成教唆或者幫助,并且平臺提供商須有主觀過錯等要件。
[Abstract]:The diversified needs of people in the Internet era promote the continuous transformation of the traditional trading mode, and the establishment of a new order network trading platform through electronic information technology emerges as the times require. Network trading platform is the summation of information network system which provides transaction matching and related services for two or more parties in e-commerce activities, and its position is very important in the process of network transaction. Facing different kinds of disputes such as the quality of goods, payment of price, terms of contract, distribution of goods and so on, the relevant system of standardizing the order of network transactions is urgently needed to be established in the current online shopping market of our country. A series of legal issues, such as legal status, rights and obligations, liability and other legal issues, have also become a hot topic in the discussion of online trading platform providers as a link between the parties to the transaction. At present, the research on the legal issues of online trading platform providers is still in the groping stage, and the scholars' views are controversial and the conclusions are not uniform. In order to promote the standardization and rationalization of the platform, the author analyzes the tripartite legal relationship among the providers, product (service) providers and consumers according to different platform models, and constructs the tripartite power and responsibility system on this basis. Through the use of many methods, such as case analysis, literature research, comparative analysis, and so on, this paper analyzes six existing theories on the legal status of platform providers in the academic circles, focusing on the center of network trading platform providers. The new intermediary position of platform provider is put forward. It is the first time to distinguish and discuss the legal relationship between platform provider, product (service) provider and consumer in B to C and C to C model. According to the shopping process of platform, the legal relationship between different subjects in each stage is clarified. This paper analyzes the scope of rights and obligations of platform providers, product (service) providers and consumers one by one, focusing on the inspection and care obligations of platform providers. This paper analyzes the legal liability of the platform provider, mainly discusses the liability for breach of contract and tort liability in the civil liability, especially the indirect tort liability of the platform provider in the civil liability. It is considered that the indirect tort liability of platform provider should satisfy the requirement that the platform user exists tort, the platform provider should be abetted or aided, and the platform provider must have subjective fault and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.294
本文編號：2456657
[Abstract]:The diversified needs of people in the Internet era promote the continuous transformation of the traditional trading mode, and the establishment of a new order network trading platform through electronic information technology emerges as the times require. Network trading platform is the summation of information network system which provides transaction matching and related services for two or more parties in e-commerce activities, and its position is very important in the process of network transaction. Facing different kinds of disputes such as the quality of goods, payment of price, terms of contract, distribution of goods and so on, the relevant system of standardizing the order of network transactions is urgently needed to be established in the current online shopping market of our country. A series of legal issues, such as legal status, rights and obligations, liability and other legal issues, have also become a hot topic in the discussion of online trading platform providers as a link between the parties to the transaction. At present, the research on the legal issues of online trading platform providers is still in the groping stage, and the scholars' views are controversial and the conclusions are not uniform. In order to promote the standardization and rationalization of the platform, the author analyzes the tripartite legal relationship among the providers, product (service) providers and consumers according to different platform models, and constructs the tripartite power and responsibility system on this basis. Through the use of many methods, such as case analysis, literature research, comparative analysis, and so on, this paper analyzes six existing theories on the legal status of platform providers in the academic circles, focusing on the center of network trading platform providers. The new intermediary position of platform provider is put forward. It is the first time to distinguish and discuss the legal relationship between platform provider, product (service) provider and consumer in B to C and C to C model. According to the shopping process of platform, the legal relationship between different subjects in each stage is clarified. This paper analyzes the scope of rights and obligations of platform providers, product (service) providers and consumers one by one, focusing on the inspection and care obligations of platform providers. This paper analyzes the legal liability of the platform provider, mainly discusses the liability for breach of contract and tort liability in the civil liability, especially the indirect tort liability of the platform provider in the civil liability. It is considered that the indirect tort liability of platform provider should satisfy the requirement that the platform user exists tort, the platform provider should be abetted or aided, and the platform provider must have subjective fault and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.294
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 楊立新;韓煦;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺提供者的法律地位與民事責(zé)任[J];江漢論壇;2014年05期
2 王斯瀅;崔青青;;淺析網(wǎng)絡(luò)團購主體法律關(guān)系及其違約責(zé)任認定[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年12期
3 韓洪今;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺提供商的法律定位[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2009年02期
4 吳仙桂;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺的法律定位[J];重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年06期
5 王遷;;論版權(quán)“間接侵權(quán)”及其規(guī)則的法定化[J];法學(xué);2005年12期
6 劉德良;網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易中網(wǎng)站的地位與責(zé)任問題探討[J];遼寧大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2004年05期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 張曼;網(wǎng)絡(luò)團購經(jīng)營商的法律地位與法律責(zé)任研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2013年
2 岳亭;網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺提供商法律責(zé)任研究[D];北方工業(yè)大學(xué);2010年
3 余天琦;在線交易平臺的法律地位及法律責(zé)任研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2005年
，本文編號：2456657
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2456657.html
