移動通信轉(zhuǎn)售業(yè)務的反壟斷法分析
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-20 08:50
【摘要】：文章在簡要介紹我國移動通信轉(zhuǎn)售業(yè)務的基礎上,對移動通信轉(zhuǎn)售過程中接入和零售這兩個基本環(huán)節(jié)中轉(zhuǎn)售企業(yè)與基礎運營商之間的關系進行了分析,隨后,文章結(jié)合電信產(chǎn)業(yè)的網(wǎng)絡型特征著重對移動通信網(wǎng)絡接入環(huán)節(jié)中市場主體的地位特別是基礎運營商的市場支配地位進行了分析,并在此基礎上對接入市場可能出現(xiàn)的濫用市場支配地位以及壟斷協(xié)議行為進行了預判和梳理。文章由六個部分組成:導論呈現(xiàn)文章的選題背景并介紹了學界對移動通信領域引入競爭的相關研究成果。簡單交待了創(chuàng)新點及諸多不足之處。此外,本部分還廓清了研究范圍,指出本文主要研究移動通信轉(zhuǎn)售業(yè)務可能引發(fā)的經(jīng)濟性壟斷且不包括其中的經(jīng)營者集中行為。第一章在簡要介紹移動通信轉(zhuǎn)售業(yè)務的基礎上,從反壟斷法的角度對轉(zhuǎn)售業(yè)務的競爭效果、相關市場、經(jīng)營者之間的關系等進行了分析。指出轉(zhuǎn)售業(yè)務既有促進競爭的積極效果,同時,圍繞轉(zhuǎn)售業(yè)務,也可能發(fā)生一些限制競爭的行為,運營商開展競爭的相關市場為移動通信服務市場,運營商之間存在既合作又競爭的關系,在批發(fā)環(huán)節(jié),基礎運營商與轉(zhuǎn)售企業(yè)之間是合作關系,而在零售環(huán)節(jié),所有運營商之間互為競爭者。在以上分析的基礎上,本章提出了轉(zhuǎn)售業(yè)務可能引發(fā)的反壟斷法擔憂。第二章著重分析轉(zhuǎn)售業(yè)務相關的濫用市場支配地位,主要結(jié)合網(wǎng)絡性的產(chǎn)業(yè)特征對濫用市場支配地位的行為類型、表現(xiàn)形式展開分析,指出基礎運營商可能濫用其優(yōu)勢拒絕轉(zhuǎn)售企業(yè)接入、收取不公平的高價或為在零售競爭中占得先機而惡意降低接入質(zhì)量。第三章主要分析了圍繞轉(zhuǎn)售業(yè)務可能發(fā)生的壟斷協(xié)議,特別是接入環(huán)節(jié)的縱向壟斷協(xié)議和橫向壟斷協(xié)議,指出基礎運營商之間可能就接入價格等接入條件進行共謀,而各基礎運營商在與轉(zhuǎn)售企業(yè)合作的過程中,可能與轉(zhuǎn)售企業(yè)達成縱向限制協(xié)議。第四章結(jié)合電信產(chǎn)業(yè)作為管制型產(chǎn)業(yè)的特性,探討了通信產(chǎn)業(yè)監(jiān)管機制與反壟斷執(zhí)法機制協(xié)調(diào)的問題,以及針對移動通信服務領域進行反壟斷執(zhí)法的過程中產(chǎn)業(yè)監(jiān)管機構(gòu)與反壟斷執(zhí)法機構(gòu)合作的問題。結(jié)論部分強調(diào)了在我國移動通信領域放松進入管制、引入競爭的重要性,以及在開放競爭的同時加強競爭執(zhí)法關注的必要性。
[Abstract]:On the basis of a brief introduction to the resale service of mobile communications in China, this paper analyzes the relationship between the resale enterprises and the basic operators in the two basic links of access and retail in the process of the resale of mobile communications, and then analyzes the relationship between the resale enterprises and the basic operators. Combined with the network characteristics of telecommunication industry, this paper analyzes the position of the market main body in the access link of mobile communication network, especially the dominant position of the basic operator. On this basis, the possible abuse of market dominance and monopoly agreement behavior in access market are forecasted and combed. The article is composed of six parts: introduction presents the background of the selected topic and introduces the related research results of the academic field on the introduction of competition in the field of mobile communications. A simple explanation of innovation and many shortcomings. In addition, this part clarifies the scope of the research, and points out that this paper mainly studies the economic monopoly which may be caused by the resale of mobile communication and does not include the centralized behavior of the operators. In the first chapter, based on the brief introduction of the resale business of mobile communication, the author analyzes the competitive effect of resale business, the related market and the relationship between the operators from the angle of anti-monopoly law. It is pointed out that resale business has the positive effect of promoting competition, at the same time, some behaviors of restricting competition may occur around resale business. The related market for operators to carry out competition is the market of mobile communication service. There is a relationship of cooperation and competition between operators. In the wholesale link, between the basic operator and resale enterprise is the cooperative relationship, but in the retail link, all operators are competitors each other. On the basis of the above analysis, this chapter raises the concerns of anti-monopoly law which may arise from resale business. The second chapter focuses on the analysis of the abuse of market dominance related to resale business, mainly combined with the characteristics of the network industry to analyze the behavior types and forms of abuse of market dominance. It is pointed out that basic operators may abuse their advantages to refuse resale enterprise access, charge unfair high prices or maliciously reduce the quality of access in order to gain an advantage in retail competition. The third chapter mainly analyzes the possible monopoly agreements around resale business, especially the vertical monopoly agreement and horizontal monopoly agreement, and points out that access conditions such as access price may be colluded among the basic operators. In the process of cooperation with resale enterprises, each basic operator may reach vertical restriction agreement with resale enterprises. The fourth chapter discusses the coordination between the regulatory mechanism and the anti-monopoly law enforcement mechanism of the telecommunications industry in combination with the characteristics of the telecommunications industry as a regulatory industry. And the cooperation between industry supervision and anti-monopoly law enforcement in the process of anti-monopoly law enforcement in the field of mobile communication service. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of loosening entry control and introducing competition in the field of mobile communication in China, as well as the necessity of strengthening competition law enforcement while opening up competition.
【學位授予單位】：中國政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.294
本文編號：2282652
[Abstract]:On the basis of a brief introduction to the resale service of mobile communications in China, this paper analyzes the relationship between the resale enterprises and the basic operators in the two basic links of access and retail in the process of the resale of mobile communications, and then analyzes the relationship between the resale enterprises and the basic operators. Combined with the network characteristics of telecommunication industry, this paper analyzes the position of the market main body in the access link of mobile communication network, especially the dominant position of the basic operator. On this basis, the possible abuse of market dominance and monopoly agreement behavior in access market are forecasted and combed. The article is composed of six parts: introduction presents the background of the selected topic and introduces the related research results of the academic field on the introduction of competition in the field of mobile communications. A simple explanation of innovation and many shortcomings. In addition, this part clarifies the scope of the research, and points out that this paper mainly studies the economic monopoly which may be caused by the resale of mobile communication and does not include the centralized behavior of the operators. In the first chapter, based on the brief introduction of the resale business of mobile communication, the author analyzes the competitive effect of resale business, the related market and the relationship between the operators from the angle of anti-monopoly law. It is pointed out that resale business has the positive effect of promoting competition, at the same time, some behaviors of restricting competition may occur around resale business. The related market for operators to carry out competition is the market of mobile communication service. There is a relationship of cooperation and competition between operators. In the wholesale link, between the basic operator and resale enterprise is the cooperative relationship, but in the retail link, all operators are competitors each other. On the basis of the above analysis, this chapter raises the concerns of anti-monopoly law which may arise from resale business. The second chapter focuses on the analysis of the abuse of market dominance related to resale business, mainly combined with the characteristics of the network industry to analyze the behavior types and forms of abuse of market dominance. It is pointed out that basic operators may abuse their advantages to refuse resale enterprise access, charge unfair high prices or maliciously reduce the quality of access in order to gain an advantage in retail competition. The third chapter mainly analyzes the possible monopoly agreements around resale business, especially the vertical monopoly agreement and horizontal monopoly agreement, and points out that access conditions such as access price may be colluded among the basic operators. In the process of cooperation with resale enterprises, each basic operator may reach vertical restriction agreement with resale enterprises. The fourth chapter discusses the coordination between the regulatory mechanism and the anti-monopoly law enforcement mechanism of the telecommunications industry in combination with the characteristics of the telecommunications industry as a regulatory industry. And the cooperation between industry supervision and anti-monopoly law enforcement in the process of anti-monopoly law enforcement in the field of mobile communication service. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of loosening entry control and introducing competition in the field of mobile communication in China, as well as the necessity of strengthening competition law enforcement while opening up competition.
【學位授予單位】：中國政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.294
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前8條
1 陳富良;自然壟斷行業(yè):效率來自民營化還是來自競爭[J];當代財經(jīng);2000年04期
2 戚聿東;自然壟斷管制的理論與實踐[J];當代財經(jīng);2001年12期
3 戚聿東;我國自然壟斷產(chǎn)業(yè)分拆式改革的誤區(qū)分析及其出路[J];管理世界;2002年02期
4 修國義,曹波;虛擬電信運營模式研究概述[J];工業(yè)工程與管理;2005年04期
5 繆因知;;縱向地域及客戶限制協(xié)議研究——兼論特許經(jīng)營與選擇性銷售中的相關限制[J];經(jīng)濟法論叢;2007年00期
6 徐玉;;國外移動運營商三大策略應對OTT業(yè)務的挑戰(zhàn)[J];世界電信;2012年03期
7 鮑華俊;;2013年全球電信服務市場發(fā)展回顧[J];通信企業(yè)管理;2014年05期
8 趙晉;;移動虛擬運營商:可能的影響及運營商應對建議[J];中國電信業(yè);2014年06期
相關重要報紙文章 前2條
1 中國電信廣州研究院 朱瑩瑩;[N];通信信息報;2014年
2 本報記者 鄭梅云;[N];通信信息報;2015年
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 劉克飛;基于博弈論的電信運營商競合關系研究[D];河北工業(yè)大學;2012年
相關碩士學位論文 前2條
1 孫丕偉;論移動通信虛擬網(wǎng)絡運營的競爭法調(diào)整[D];中國政法大學;2006年
2 劉琦;電信分層經(jīng)營研究[D];北京郵電大學;2006年
，本文編號：2282652
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2282652.html
