【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)的普及帶來(lái)的不僅是通訊和信息傳播的便利,更是為經(jīng)營(yíng)者們提供了新的經(jīng)營(yíng)機(jī)會(huì)。網(wǎng)絡(luò)市場(chǎng)的開(kāi)辟,使得網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)者這一群體迅速發(fā)展起來(lái),創(chuàng)造了更多的經(jīng)濟(jì)利益。網(wǎng)絡(luò)市場(chǎng)中交易成本低、機(jī)會(huì)多、利潤(rùn)極為豐厚,在如此誘惑之下,不可避免地有部分網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)者采用不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)手段進(jìn)行經(jīng)營(yíng),網(wǎng)絡(luò)特有的技術(shù)性更是催生了一系列特殊的不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為。這些行為對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)市場(chǎng)的經(jīng)營(yíng)秩序的影響無(wú)疑是極壞的,如不加以規(guī)制,必然會(huì)制約網(wǎng)絡(luò)市場(chǎng)的長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)發(fā)展。本文旨在從提出網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)者概念入手,對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)者的不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為進(jìn)行分析,試找出現(xiàn)行法律中存在的不足進(jìn)而提出完善建議。文章第一部分提出網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)者概念,明確了網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)者的定義并對(duì)其法律特征進(jìn)行分析,認(rèn)定網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)者是適格的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法規(guī)制主體,依據(jù)經(jīng)營(yíng)主體的不同對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)者進(jìn)行分類,厘清網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)者與其他相關(guān)概念的區(qū)別,為下文討論網(wǎng)絡(luò)中的不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為奠定基礎(chǔ)。文章第二部分的第一層面對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)市場(chǎng)中存在的不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為作出分析,首先分析了應(yīng)如何對(duì)該行為進(jìn)行認(rèn)定,其次列舉了網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)者不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為的類型,最后總結(jié)了網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)者采取不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為的危害。第二層面分析了對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)者不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為進(jìn)行法律規(guī)制的必要性,包括對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)活動(dòng)是否需要法律規(guī)制以及需要什么樣的法律進(jìn)行規(guī)制等問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了討論。文章第三部分著重分析了現(xiàn)行法律在規(guī)制網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)者不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為上的不足,特別是《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》的缺陷及網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)者主體身份確認(rèn)問(wèn)題上存在諸多問(wèn)題,此外對(duì)行為人的責(zé)任規(guī)定也較為模糊,其他部門(mén)法亦缺少有關(guān)網(wǎng)絡(luò)方面的規(guī)定等。文章第四部分上升至法律規(guī)制體系的構(gòu)建層面,對(duì)前文所涉不足之處一一提出解決措施,以期在原有法律體系基礎(chǔ)上完善對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)者不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為的規(guī)制,使網(wǎng)絡(luò)市場(chǎng)得到長(zhǎng)期穩(wěn)健的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The popularization of network not only brings the convenience of communication and information dissemination, but also provides new business opportunities for operators. With the development of network market, network operators have developed rapidly and created more economic benefits. In the network market, the transaction cost is low, the opportunity is many, the profit is extremely rich, under such temptation, some network operators inevitably adopt unfair competitive means to operate. The unique technology of network has given birth to a series of special unfair competition behavior. The influence of these behaviors on the management order of the network market is undoubtedly very bad. If not regulated, it will inevitably restrict the long-term development of the network market. The purpose of this paper is to put forward the concept of network operator, analyze the unfair competition behavior of network operator, try to find out the shortcomings of the current law and put forward some suggestions to improve it. In the first part of the article, the concept of network operator is put forward, the definition of network operator is defined and the legal characteristics of network operator are analyzed, and it is concluded that network operator is the appropriate subject of competition law regulation. This paper classifies the network operators according to the different business subjects, clarifies the differences between the network operators and other related concepts, and lays the foundation for the discussion of unfair competition behavior in the network. The first level of the second part of the article analyzes the unfair competition behavior in the network market. Firstly, it analyzes how to identify the behavior, and then lists the types of unfair competition behavior of network operators. Finally, the paper summarizes the harm of unfair competition by network operators. The second level analyzes the necessity of legal regulation on the unfair competition behavior of network operators, including the discussion of whether or not the network business activities need legal regulation and what kind of legal regulation. The third part focuses on the analysis of the shortcomings of the current law in regulating the unfair competition behavior of network operators, especially the defects of Anti-unfair Competition Law and the problems of identity confirmation of network operators. In addition, the responsibility of the perpetrator is also vague, and other laws also lack the network provisions and so on. The fourth part of the article rises to the level of construction of legal regulation system, and puts forward the solutions to the deficiencies mentioned above one by one, in order to improve the regulation of unfair competition behavior of network operators on the basis of the original legal system. Make network market get long-term steady development.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 張曉明;網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)——21世紀(jì)的經(jīng)營(yíng)新潮[J];國(guó)際展望;1997年12期

2 徐陽(yáng);美國(guó)時(shí)興免費(fèi)電腦[J];國(guó)際展望;1999年16期

3 ;重慶市工商行政管理局關(guān)于印發(fā)重慶市網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)者電子標(biāo)識(shí)管理規(guī)定(試行)的通知[J];重慶市人民政府公報(bào);2013年20期

4 李晶;劉正峰;;淺析電子商務(wù)中網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)的幾種模式[J];黑龍江省社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

5 江山;葉鋼強(qiáng);;娃哈哈:網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)與廣告創(chuàng)意的完美結(jié)合——杭商企業(yè)品牌成功塑造的典例之一[J];杭州(下半月);2009年10期

6 ;有線電視基本收視維護(hù)費(fèi)管理暫行辦法[J];新法規(guī)月刊;2005年01期

7 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條

1 ;加速電子商務(wù)監(jiān)管平臺(tái)建設(shè)構(gòu)筑網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)主體資信體系[A];市場(chǎng)監(jiān)管理論與實(shí)踐研究——中國(guó)工商行政管理學(xué)會(huì)2001-2002年度課題研究成果集[C];2003年

2 王東東;;3C廠商低碳銷(xiāo)售時(shí)代的機(jī)會(huì)與挑戰(zhàn)[A];第四屆中部地區(qū)商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇論文集[C];2010年

3 曲國(guó)華;楊綸普;劉燕;;淺談?dòng)芯�電視網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)管理平臺(tái)[A];2005年廣播電視技術(shù)論文匯編[C];2005年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 大連市工商局公平交易處 蘇 巖;以網(wǎng)管網(wǎng) 強(qiáng)化監(jiān)控[N];中國(guó)工商報(bào);2007年

2 浙江省臺(tái)州市工商局 路橋分局 陶利軍;對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)主體實(shí)施準(zhǔn)入登記的依據(jù)[N];中國(guó)工商報(bào);2007年

3 林曉蓁;貴在正確理解[N];中國(guó)新聞出版報(bào);2007年

4 鄒風(fēng)嶺;網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)先“賣(mài)信譽(yù)”[N];中國(guó)高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)導(dǎo)報(bào);2000年

5 記者 張曉松;普查網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)主體[N];新華每日電訊;2010年

6 臨杜工;臨海成立網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)者黨支部[N];中國(guó)工商報(bào);2011年

7 記者 王春艷　實(shí)習(xí)記者 齊渡謙;上海規(guī)范網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)企業(yè)網(wǎng)上亮照行為[N];中國(guó)工商報(bào);2012年

8 記者 顏偉;在川從事網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)必須亮照[N];中國(guó)工商報(bào);2014年

9 記者 曲靜;全省網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)主體達(dá)到4.7萬(wàn)戶[N];黑龍江日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

10 戚舒婷　梁昌軍;合肥：網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)主體達(dá)4.9萬(wàn)戶[N];安徽經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2014年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王英照;面向信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)的客戶需求研究[D];哈爾濱工程大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 韓琪;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)[D];哈爾濱工程大學(xué);2001年

2 路晴;網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)者不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法律規(guī)制研究[D];寧波大學(xué);2015年

3 程志欣;網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)營(yíng)主體商事登記制度研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2282282