指導案例制度的功能及其限度——以指導案例8號的引用情況為分析樣本
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-16 16:00
【摘要】：對指導案例制度的研究,目前應轉入對單個指導案例實際運行情況進行追蹤式的研究進路。本文是該研究轉向的一個嘗試,以指導案例8號為分析樣本。對其引用情況的數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計與分析表明,其引用狀況較為"低劣",遠未實現(xiàn)最高院所預期的"指導功能"。以此為基礎,本文對指導案例制度的功能予以反思,指出其限度所在,認為在實現(xiàn)"同案同判"的宏旨上,一方面對其不應抱持過高的預期,另一方面又有相當?shù)目勺鳛榭臻g。
[Abstract]:At present, the research of guiding case system should be turned to the research approach of tracing the actual operation of a single guiding case. This paper is an attempt to guide case 8 as an analysis sample. The statistics and analysis of the citation data show that the quoting condition is inferior and far from realizing the "guiding function" expected by the Supreme Court. On the basis of this, this paper reflects on the function of guiding case system, points out its limitation, and holds that, on the one hand, it should not be expected too high, on the other hand, it can be regarded as space.
【作者單位】： 北京大學法學院;
【分類號】：D922.291.91
，
本文編號：2274873
[Abstract]:At present, the research of guiding case system should be turned to the research approach of tracing the actual operation of a single guiding case. This paper is an attempt to guide case 8 as an analysis sample. The statistics and analysis of the citation data show that the quoting condition is inferior and far from realizing the "guiding function" expected by the Supreme Court. On the basis of this, this paper reflects on the function of guiding case system, points out its limitation, and holds that, on the one hand, it should not be expected too high, on the other hand, it can be regarded as space.
【作者單位】： 北京大學法學院;
【分類號】：D922.291.91
，
本文編號：2274873
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2274873.html
