【摘要】：分期付款買賣之所有權(quán)保留制度是經(jīng)過時間的過濾沉淀下來能夠適用市場經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會需求的產(chǎn)物。這個制度經(jīng)過大量實(shí)踐與時間的打磨已經(jīng)得到了市場的廣泛認(rèn)可,其能夠很好地顧及到雙方當(dāng)事人與善意第三人,使其利益不致于遭受到損害,不但如此,其最大的優(yōu)點(diǎn)還在于能夠顧及到交易的安全性與交易的效率性�？偠灾�,此制度是能夠得到市場的認(rèn)同并不斷完善其出現(xiàn)了不足之處,是值得去繼續(xù)研究的制度。對所有權(quán)保留制度的研究在理論方面的研究成果比比皆是,但筆者還是想再去班門弄斧地去探析此制度的深奧之處。隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,人們消費(fèi)理念的轉(zhuǎn)念以及交易的增多,使得該制度在司法實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)了諸多需要解決的問題。法律的滯后性與解決問題緊迫性之間的矛盾,推定了新的法律條文的出現(xiàn)。在新的《買賣合同司法解釋》出臺這一契機(jī)的推動下,所有權(quán)買賣在市場的應(yīng)用過程中,應(yīng)該會出現(xiàn)與以往不同的新氣象。因?yàn)樾碌姆蓷l文的出現(xiàn),必定會對司法實(shí)踐問題的解決起到新的指導(dǎo)作用,而且在頒行后的近期一段時間也是考驗(yàn)法律是否與國情相適應(yīng)的攻堅(jiān)時期,可以在這一階段進(jìn)行相關(guān)法律適用中的問題的收集,以此可以為后期再次進(jìn)行新的司法解釋提供現(xiàn)實(shí)方面的實(shí)踐問題依據(jù)。《買賣合同司法解釋》雖然解決了一些現(xiàn)實(shí)中出現(xiàn)的具體問題,但法律本身特有的滯后性的特征,使其仍然會繼續(xù)出現(xiàn)不足的漏洞。比如,此次的法律規(guī)定中關(guān)于所有權(quán)保留制度在其內(nèi)部效力和外部效力方面仍有許多需要進(jìn)一步細(xì)化和明確的地方,另外,該司法解釋對所有權(quán)保留適用范圍的限制也過于嚴(yán)格,在所有權(quán)保留方面的有關(guān)登記與否的具體法律導(dǎo)向也未涉及到。這些種種的原因都是我們需要對其進(jìn)行研究的推動力,因此可以說其法律適用問題是需要進(jìn)一步探討的,這也是這篇文章筆者之所以進(jìn)行探討的原因所在。本文旨在通過該最新的司法解釋對分期付款買賣之所有權(quán)保留制度的法律適用問題進(jìn)行探析,并在對其進(jìn)行解讀和分析的基礎(chǔ)上,提出了相關(guān)的完善建議,使得分期付款買賣之所有權(quán)保留制度能夠更好的與我國市場相融合。本文主要通過四部分對所有權(quán)保留的法律適用問題進(jìn)行探析,第一部分先對分期付款買賣之所有權(quán)保利制度的相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行介紹,為后面的法律適用問題的分析做好基礎(chǔ)理論上的鋪墊。第二部分通過實(shí)例對所有權(quán)保留制度的法律適用進(jìn)行分析,找出司法實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的一些焦點(diǎn)問題,并對當(dāng)事人相關(guān)的所有權(quán)保留制度法律適用中的焦點(diǎn)問題進(jìn)行闡述。第三部分對所有權(quán)保留制度的法律適用問題中的范圍及法律效力問題這兩部分進(jìn)行具體探討。第四部分是根據(jù)第三部分的具體問題提出一些相應(yīng)的完善建議。
[Abstract]:The retention of ownership system is the product of market economy and social demand. This system, which has been widely accepted by the market after a great deal of practice and time grinding, has been able to take good account of both parties and bona fide third parties, so that their interests will not be harmed, and more so, Its biggest advantage also lies in the ability to take into account the transaction security and trading efficiency. In a word, this system is the one that can be recognized by the market and perfected continuously, which is worthy of further study. The research on the retention of title system is full of achievements in theory, but the author still wants to explore the profound aspects of the system. With the development of economy, the change of people's consumption idea and the increase of transaction, there are many problems that need to be solved in the judicial practice. The contradiction between the lag of law and the urgency of solving the problem presumes the emergence of new legal provisions. Under the impetus of the introduction of the new "Judicial interpretation of the contract of purchase and Exchange", there should be a new situation different from the previous one in the application of ownership trading in the market. Because the emergence of new legal provisions will certainly play a new guiding role in solving the problems in judicial practice, and the recent period after enactment will also be a critical period to test whether the law is suitable for the national conditions. The collection of issues in the application of relevant laws can be carried out at this stage, In this way, it can provide practical basis for the new judicial interpretation in the later period. Although the judicial interpretation of the contract of sale has solved some specific problems in reality, the law itself has the characteristic of lag. Make it still will continue to appear insufficient loophole. For example, there are still many areas in the current legal provisions concerning the internal and external effects of the retention of title regime that need to be further refined and clarified, in addition, The judicial interpretation limits the scope of application of retention of title too strictly, and the specific legal guidance on registration or not in respect of retention of title is not covered. All these reasons are the driving force that we need to study, so we can say that the application of the law needs to be further explored, which is the reason why the author of this article. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the legal application of the retention of title system of installment purchase and sale through the latest judicial interpretation, and on the basis of its interpretation and analysis, the author puts forward some suggestions to improve it. So that the retention of ownership system of installment purchase and sale can better integrate with the market of our country. This paper mainly analyzes the application of the law of retention of title in four parts. The first part introduces the related concepts of the system of interest of ownership in installment purchase and sale. For the subsequent analysis of the application of the law to do a good job in basic theory. In the second part, the author analyzes the legal application of the retention of title system through examples, finds out some focus problems in judicial practice, and expounds the focus issues in the legal application of the ownership retention system related to the parties. The third part discusses the scope and legal effect of the legal application of the retention of title system. The fourth part is according to the third part of the specific problems put forward some corresponding suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.28;D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王利明;;所有權(quán)保留制度若干問題探討——兼評《買賣合同司法解釋》相關(guān)規(guī)定[J];法學(xué)評論;2014年01期

2 寧紅麗;;分期付款買賣法律條款的消費(fèi)者保護(hù)建構(gòu)[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2013年02期

3 翟云嶺;;分期付款買賣中出賣人行使取回權(quán)之際對于買受人利益之保護(hù)[J];河北法學(xué);2007年09期

4 姚歡慶;;《合同法》第167條規(guī)范宗旨之錯位及補(bǔ)救[J];浙江社會科學(xué);2007年02期

5 茆榮華,孫少君;所有權(quán)保留糾紛審判實(shí)務(wù)研究[J];法學(xué);2005年01期

6 陳榮文;所有權(quán)保留的法律性質(zhì)論析[J];亞太經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年04期

7 王明鎖;物上請求權(quán)與物權(quán)的民法保護(hù)機(jī)制[J];中國法學(xué);2003年01期

8 周顯志,張永忠;所有權(quán)保留的分期付款消費(fèi)信貸法律問題探討[J];暨南學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2002年01期

9 余能斌,侯向磊;保留所有權(quán)買賣比較研究[J];法學(xué)研究;2000年05期

10 張定軍;所有權(quán)保留——分期付價買賣的有效保障[J];華中理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1999年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 申衛(wèi)星;期待權(quán)理論研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2001年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 藤井隆志;中國分期付款買賣制度探究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2005年

，

本文編號：2256513