【摘要】：船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)作為海商法的特有制度,體現(xiàn)的是海商法對(duì)特定主體的保護(hù)。船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)是針對(duì)特定船舶享有優(yōu)先受償?shù)臋?quán)利。一般情況下,它的實(shí)現(xiàn)并不復(fù)雜;然而在跨境海事破產(chǎn)案件下,船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)具有雙重性質(zhì):破產(chǎn)債權(quán)和海事請(qǐng)求權(quán)。破產(chǎn)程序與海事程序的交叉,使它的實(shí)現(xiàn)過(guò)程變得復(fù)雜起來(lái)。這也是該篇論文的寫(xiě)作初衷。本文針對(duì)跨境海事破產(chǎn)案件中船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)在實(shí)現(xiàn)過(guò)程中可能遇到的主要問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析,并結(jié)合相關(guān)案件介紹其他國(guó)家的做法,旨在為我國(guó)協(xié)調(diào)破產(chǎn)程序與海事程序之際的沖突提供有價(jià)值的理論依據(jù),為我國(guó)跨境海事破產(chǎn)制度的建立提出建議。本文分為引言、正文和結(jié)論三部分。正文部分分為四個(gè)章節(jié)展開(kāi)論述:第一章明確了跨境海事破產(chǎn)案件的相關(guān)概念,并對(duì)跨境海事破產(chǎn)案件中船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)的管轄權(quán)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了論述。第二章闡述的重點(diǎn)是船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)在跨境海事破產(chǎn)案件中受償時(shí)可能遇到的法律適用問(wèn)題,分為破產(chǎn)法與海商法的適用問(wèn)題、破產(chǎn)程序中船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)的法律性質(zhì)及船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)自身的法律適用三部分。第三章圍繞著船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)在跨境海事破產(chǎn)案件中遇到的程序問(wèn)題,從破產(chǎn)保全對(duì)船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)行使的影響和外國(guó)破產(chǎn)救濟(jì)對(duì)船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)行使的影響兩個(gè)角度展開(kāi)論述。第四章節(jié)對(duì)跨境海事破產(chǎn)案件中船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)在我國(guó)現(xiàn)有破產(chǎn)法律和海事法律框架下的行使進(jìn)行分析,并結(jié)合相關(guān)的司法實(shí)踐提出建議,旨在彌補(bǔ)我國(guó)在跨境海事破產(chǎn)領(lǐng)域的缺失,實(shí)現(xiàn)海事特別程序與破產(chǎn)程序之間的銜接與協(xié)調(diào),以緩和海事法院與破產(chǎn)受理法院在跨境海事破產(chǎn)案件上的種種沖突,順應(yīng)跨境海事破產(chǎn)領(lǐng)域的國(guó)際合作趨勢(shì),加強(qiáng)我國(guó)與國(guó)際社會(huì)在相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的互助與協(xié)作。
[Abstract]:Maritime lien, as a special system of maritime law, embodies the protection of specific subjects. Maritime lien is the right of priority payment to a particular ship. In general, its realization is not complicated; however, in cross-border maritime bankruptcy cases, maritime liens have a dual nature: bankruptcy claims and maritime claims. The intersection of bankruptcy procedure and maritime procedure makes its realization process complicated. This is also the original intention of the paper. This paper analyzes the main problems that maritime liens may encounter in the realization of cross-border maritime bankruptcy cases, and introduces the practices of other countries in the light of relevant cases. The purpose of this paper is to provide a valuable theoretical basis for the conflict between the bankruptcy procedure and the maritime procedure in China, and to put forward some suggestions for the establishment of the cross-border maritime bankruptcy system in China. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text is divided into four chapters: the first chapter clarifies the related concepts of cross-border maritime bankruptcy cases and discusses the jurisdiction of maritime liens in cross-border maritime bankruptcy cases. The second chapter focuses on the legal application of maritime liens in cross-border maritime bankruptcy cases, which can be divided into bankruptcy law and maritime law. There are three parts: the legal nature of maritime lien and the application of law of maritime lien itself. The third chapter focuses on the procedural problems of maritime liens in cross-border maritime bankruptcy cases from two aspects: the impact of bankruptcy preservation on the exercise of maritime liens and the impact of foreign bankruptcy remedies on the exercise of maritime liens. The fourth chapter analyzes the exercise of maritime liens in cross-border maritime bankruptcy cases under the existing bankruptcy law and maritime law framework in China, and puts forward some suggestions combined with the relevant judicial practice. The purpose of this paper is to make up for the deficiency in the field of cross-border maritime bankruptcy in China, to realize the connection and coordination between maritime special procedures and bankruptcy procedures, and to ease the conflicts between maritime courts and bankruptcy courts in cross-border maritime bankruptcy cases. In accordance with the trend of international cooperation in the field of cross-border maritime bankruptcy, we should strengthen the mutual assistance and cooperation between China and the international community in related fields.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉杰,劉一展;航養(yǎng)費(fèi)能否列入船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)范圍——對(duì)最高法院一則司法解釋的質(zhì)疑[J];中國(guó)水運(yùn);2004年10期

2 王煒;墊款人取得船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)的相關(guān)問(wèn)題分析[J];水運(yùn)管理;2004年06期

3 李亮;船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)實(shí)行論[J];廣西社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年07期

4 孫瑛;宋建俠;;船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)客體范圍比較與研究[J];中國(guó)水運(yùn)(學(xué)術(shù)版);2006年08期

5 黃展健;徐剛;;論船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)的的法律性質(zhì)[J];現(xiàn)代商業(yè);2007年12期

6 孫瑛;孫瑋;;船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)項(xiàng)目比較研究[J];時(shí)代金融;2007年05期

7 高峰;;船舶留置權(quán)與船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)順位之思考[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

8 許芳;;淺談船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)[J];中國(guó)水運(yùn)(下半月);2008年08期

9 劉sョ，

本文編號(hào)：2231090