反壟斷法寬恕制度研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-07 17:38
【摘要】：各國反壟斷機構均將壟斷協(xié)議視為一種嚴重危害經濟的行為。壟斷協(xié)議通過提高價格、限定產量的方式限制競爭,從而最終導致資源利用的低效率。為了消除壟斷協(xié)議的消極影響,反壟斷機構設計出了寬恕制度。中國在2007年出臺了《反壟斷法》并首次規(guī)定了寬恕制度,在反壟斷方面發(fā)揮了重要作用,但不能否認的是,相比于世界其他國家,我國的寬恕制度顯得僵硬、粗糙和落后,已經不能適用我國市場經濟的發(fā)展和國際化的進程,需要進行改革和完善。第一,本文通過法理分析論證了寬恕制度符合公平正義原則和誠實信用原則,并通過成本收益分析得出寬恕制度可以誘發(fā)壟斷協(xié)議參與者內心恐懼來使壟斷協(xié)議暴露,是一種有效的激勵機制;第二,本文研究了其他國家的的寬恕制度,主要搜集并精煉了美國和歐盟的寬恕制度具體規(guī)則,如一般程序、個人寬恕制度和超寬恕制度,以及美國特有的"胡蘿卜加大棒"措施和歐盟特有的"ECN"模式,最后將美國和歐盟的寬恕制度進行詳細對比,并介紹了寬恕制度的國際化趨勢;第三,通過以上的分析和總結發(fā)現(xiàn)我國寬恕制度存在的缺陷,立法中程序性事項缺失,實體事項規(guī)定不明確;執(zhí)法中懲罰缺乏力度導致寬恕制度缺乏吸引力,多元執(zhí)法機構降低了寬恕制度的實施效率;缺乏國際合作和必要的普及教育使得寬恕制度的實施環(huán)境欠佳。最后,在借鑒域外經驗的基礎上,建議我國完善寬恕制度實施的程序條件和實體條件,引入標記制度,允許口頭申請寬恕,明確寬恕.制度的適用主體和時間范圍、明確寬恕申請者的差別化待遇;加強處罰的嚴厲性、建立統(tǒng)一的執(zhí)法機構;加強我國寬恕制度的國際交流與合作以及對寬恕制度的普及教育,構建寬恕制度有效實施的外部環(huán)境。
[Abstract]:The antitrust agencies of all countries regard monopoly agreement as a kind of serious harm to the economy. Monopoly agreements limit competition by raising prices and limiting output, which ultimately leads to inefficient use of resources. In order to eliminate the negative effects of monopoly agreements, antitrust agencies designed a leniency system. China issued the Anti-monopoly Law in 2007 and stipulated forgiving system for the first time, which has played an important role in antitrust, but it can not be denied that compared with other countries in the world, China's forgiveness system is rigid, rough and backward. Can not apply to the development of China's market economy and the process of internationalization, need to reform and improve. First, this paper demonstrates that the leniency system conforms to the principle of fairness and justice and the principle of good faith through legal analysis, and through cost-benefit analysis, the author concludes that the leniency system can induce the inner fear of the participants in the monopoly agreement and expose the monopoly agreement. Second, this paper studies the forgiving systems of other countries, mainly collecting and refining the specific rules of the United States and the European Union, such as the general procedure, the personal leniency system and the super-leniency system. Finally, it compares the forgiveness system between the United States and the European Union in detail, and introduces the internationalization trend of the forgiveness system. Through the above analysis and summary, we find that there are defects in the leniency system in our country, the procedural matters in the legislation are missing, the provisions of substantive matters are not clear, and the lack of punishment in law enforcement leads to the lack of attraction of the leniency system. Multiple law enforcement agencies reduce the efficiency of the leniency system, and the lack of international cooperation and the necessary universal education make the enforcement environment of leniency system poor. Finally, on the basis of the experience of foreign countries, it is suggested that our country should perfect the procedural and substantive conditions for the implementation of the leniency system, introduce the marking system, allow oral application for forgiveness, and make clear the forgiveness. The main body of application and time frame of the system, to make clear the differential treatment of lenient applicants, to strengthen the severity of punishment, to establish a unified law enforcement agency, to strengthen the international exchange and cooperation of the leniency system of our country and to popularize the education of leniency system. To construct the external environment for the effective implementation of the leniency system.
【學位授予單位】：天津工業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.294
[Abstract]:The antitrust agencies of all countries regard monopoly agreement as a kind of serious harm to the economy. Monopoly agreements limit competition by raising prices and limiting output, which ultimately leads to inefficient use of resources. In order to eliminate the negative effects of monopoly agreements, antitrust agencies designed a leniency system. China issued the Anti-monopoly Law in 2007 and stipulated forgiving system for the first time, which has played an important role in antitrust, but it can not be denied that compared with other countries in the world, China's forgiveness system is rigid, rough and backward. Can not apply to the development of China's market economy and the process of internationalization, need to reform and improve. First, this paper demonstrates that the leniency system conforms to the principle of fairness and justice and the principle of good faith through legal analysis, and through cost-benefit analysis, the author concludes that the leniency system can induce the inner fear of the participants in the monopoly agreement and expose the monopoly agreement. Second, this paper studies the forgiving systems of other countries, mainly collecting and refining the specific rules of the United States and the European Union, such as the general procedure, the personal leniency system and the super-leniency system. Finally, it compares the forgiveness system between the United States and the European Union in detail, and introduces the internationalization trend of the forgiveness system. Through the above analysis and summary, we find that there are defects in the leniency system in our country, the procedural matters in the legislation are missing, the provisions of substantive matters are not clear, and the lack of punishment in law enforcement leads to the lack of attraction of the leniency system. Multiple law enforcement agencies reduce the efficiency of the leniency system, and the lack of international cooperation and the necessary universal education make the enforcement environment of leniency system poor. Finally, on the basis of the experience of foreign countries, it is suggested that our country should perfect the procedural and substantive conditions for the implementation of the leniency system, introduce the marking system, allow oral application for forgiveness, and make clear the forgiveness. The main body of application and time frame of the system, to make clear the differential treatment of lenient applicants, to strengthen the severity of punishment, to establish a unified law enforcement agency, to strengthen the international exchange and cooperation of the leniency system of our country and to popularize the education of leniency system. To construct the external environment for the effective implementation of the leniency system.
【學位授予單位】：天津工業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.294
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 王海燕;;我國反壟斷法寬恕制度研究[J];山西青年;2016年15期
2 洪瑩瑩;;反壟斷法寬恕制度的中國實踐及理論反思[J];政治與法律;2015年05期
3 張U，
本文編號：2170827
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2170827.html
