本文選題：信用證欺詐 + 開證行�。� 參考：《廣東財經(jīng)大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來,我國許多開證行的進口信用證被動墊款的數(shù)量總額大幅增加,外匯不良資產(chǎn)比例大幅提高,嚴重制約了我國開證行外匯業(yè)務(wù)的持續(xù)穩(wěn)定發(fā)展。樹欲靜而風不止,我國開證行在國際交往中常成為信用證欺詐的受害者,但我國目前關(guān)于信用證欺詐方面的立法水平不高,對于開證行權(quán)益保護問題涉及較少,致使法院在審理相關(guān)案件時因為缺乏足夠的法律依據(jù),出現(xiàn)不同甚至矛盾的判決結(jié)果,大大影響了開證行的業(yè)務(wù)活動及其在國際上的聲譽。因此有必要對開證行權(quán)益保護的理論以及國內(nèi)外立法、司法現(xiàn)狀進行深入的探討,并在此基礎(chǔ)上對開證行權(quán)益保護提出立法及司法上的完善建議,以更好的保護開證行權(quán)益。本文通過綜合分析學界已有的研究成果,探索開證行權(quán)益保護的背后法理,在此基礎(chǔ)上提煉出自己對于信用證欺詐下開證行權(quán)益保護的理解,再結(jié)合實際的案例和新的形勢,明確信用證欺詐下開證行權(quán)益的具體內(nèi)容及其保護存在的問題,解決司法實踐中對信用證欺詐下開證行權(quán)益保護不足的現(xiàn)實問題。本文共分為四章,第一章主要論述了信用證欺詐下開證行權(quán)益保護的基本法理。對開證行的地位、權(quán)利以及開證行在信用證欺詐下受到侵害的主要形式進行了概述,再分析了保護開證行權(quán)益的主要理論基礎(chǔ)。第二章主要分析我國信用證欺詐下開證行權(quán)益保護的現(xiàn)狀及存在的問題。指出立法中缺乏專門的法律法規(guī)、對欺詐的認定標準模糊以及對舉證責任規(guī)定不清,司法實踐中司法救濟措施不合理、法官自由裁量權(quán)過大等問題。第三章運用比較的方法對信用證欺詐例下開證行權(quán)益保護予以分析。通過對信用證欺詐例下開證行權(quán)益保護在英美法系國家、大陸法系國家以及國際公約和國際商會的規(guī)定及適用進行分析,比較它們的優(yōu)勢和不足,并指出可借鑒之處。第四章針對前文所述現(xiàn)狀及問題,在立法、司法及開證行自身方面分別提出可行性的完善建議。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the total amount of passive advances of import letters of credit of many issuing banks in China has increased significantly, and the proportion of non-performing foreign exchange assets has increased substantially, which has seriously restricted the continuous and stable development of foreign exchange business of issuing banks in China. The issuing bank of our country often becomes the victim of letter of credit fraud in the international communication, but the legislation level of the fraud of letter of credit in our country is not high at present, and the protection of the rights and interests of the issuing bank is less involved. As a result of the lack of sufficient legal basis, the court has different or even contradictory judgment results, which greatly affects the business activities of the issuing bank and its reputation in the international community. Therefore, it is necessary to make a thorough discussion on the theory of the protection of the rights and interests of the issuing bank, as well as the domestic and foreign legislation and the current situation of the judiciary, and on this basis, to put forward legislative and judicial suggestions for the protection of the rights and interests of the issuing bank, in order to better protect the rights and interests of the issuing bank. By synthetically analyzing the existing research results in academic circles, this paper explores the legal principle behind the protection of the rights and interests of issuing banks, and on this basis extracts its own understanding of the protection of the rights and interests of issuing banks under the fraud of letters of credit, and then combines with actual cases and new situations. This paper clarifies the concrete contents of issuing bank's rights and interests under the fraud of letter of credit and the problems existing in its protection, and solves the practical problem of inadequate protection of the issuing bank's rights and interests under the fraud of letter of credit in judicial practice. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter mainly discusses the basic legal principle of issuing bank's rights and interests protection under letter of credit fraud. This paper summarizes the position, rights and the main forms of infringement of issuing bank under the fraud of letter of credit, and then analyzes the main theoretical basis of protecting the rights and interests of issuing bank. The second chapter mainly analyzes the current situation and existing problems of issuing bank's rights and interests protection under the fraud of letter of credit in China. It is pointed out that there is a lack of special laws and regulations in legislation, the identification standard of fraud is vague, the burden of proof is not clear, the judicial relief measures in judicial practice are unreasonable, and the discretion of judges is too large. Chapter three analyzes the protection of issuing bank's rights and interests in the case of letter of credit fraud by means of comparative method. By analyzing the provisions and application of issuing bank's rights and interests in common law countries, continental law countries, international conventions and international chambers of commerce in the case of letter of credit fraud, this paper compares their advantages and disadvantages, and points out the points that can be used for reference. Chapter four puts forward some feasible suggestions on legislation, judicature and issuing bank in view of the present situation and problems mentioned above.
【學位授予單位】：廣東財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.281

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉其昌;開證行付款義務(wù)芻議[J];對外經(jīng)貿(mào)實務(wù);2000年10期

2 張彩蓉;淺析開證行與買賣雙方關(guān)系及權(quán)利義務(wù)[J];法律適用;1998年06期

3 劉艷;開證行提貨擔保后是否還有權(quán)拒付?[J];中國外匯管理;2005年08期

4 羅伯·M·羅森布里斯 ,崔莉;臨時止付令對信用證效期和開證行義務(wù)的影響[J];中國外匯管理;2003年11期

5 徐靜超;;信用證結(jié)算中開證行的獨立拒付權(quán)法律問題研究[J];法制與社會;2008年13期

6 李群星;略論跟單信用證欺詐中開證行的權(quán)利和義務(wù)[J];法學評論;1998年03期

7 王學惠;;開證指示不明確的風險由誰承擔[J];中國外匯;2011年17期

8 錢勁松;開證行拒付應(yīng)明示其意[J];中國外匯管理;2002年11期

9 秦茹;;跟單信用證項下開證行與兩方當事人之間的法律關(guān)系[J];國際金融;2003年02期

10 牛鳳國;;試論跟單信用證開證合同[J];研究生法學;1994年03期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 吳軍;國外不符點出單，開證行怎么辦[N];中國貿(mào)易報;2005年

2 中國光大銀行總行 肖英男;淺析開證授信額度的業(yè)務(wù)風險及其防范[N];國際商報;2000年

3 紫云;開證行對不符點的處理方法面臨的風險[N];國際商報;2003年

4 李道金;專家小組和開證行怎能如此行事[N];國際商報;2004年

5 鄧旭系法學博士，現(xiàn)任上海對外貿(mào)易學院講師、法學專業(yè)主任;開證行退單，，如何保證貨款回收？[N];民營經(jīng)濟報;2005年

6 高欣;開證行與買方勾結(jié) 惡意挑剔不符點案[N];國際商報;2007年

7 于洪波;開證行慎出提貨擔保[N];國際商報;2001年

8 王子;開證行對不符點的處理方法[N];國際商報;2003年

9 李道金;開證行是這樣被說服的[N];國際商報;2002年

10 全球信用證糾紛處理網(wǎng) 李道金;成功收回被西班牙開證行拒付的款項始末[N];國際商報;2009年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前9條

1 鄧為然;我國信用證欺詐下開證行權(quán)益保護研究[D];廣東財經(jīng)大學;2015年

2 吳觀金;跟單信用證下開證行的責任研究[D];復(fù)旦大學;2011年

3 王光;跟單信用證項下開證行的法律地位[D];吉林大學;2009年

4 杜巍;跟單信用證下開證行權(quán)益保護的法律問題研究[D];大連海事大學;2013年

5 姚穎;信用證下開證行權(quán)益保護問題研究[D];大連海事大學;2002年

6 呂雁冰;備用證及相關(guān)慣例的研究[D];東北財經(jīng)大學;2005年

7 宋云萍;國際貿(mào)易融資中授信開證的風險分析及防范[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學;2005年

8 趙蔚華;備用證及其主要適用規(guī)則——ISP98與UCP500、UCC5比較研究[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學;2002年

9 李彥榮;我國對外貿(mào)易短期融資風險研究[D];山西財經(jīng)大學;2010年

本文編號：2045330