本文選題：《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》 + 適用范圍　； 參考：《內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位行為的規(guī)制在我國(guó)的立法中主要存在于《反壟斷法》中,然而《反壟斷法》對(duì)主體要求之高恰恰不利于對(duì)該種行為的規(guī)制,從而影響了對(duì)該種行為的防范與處罰。"相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位"與"市場(chǎng)支配地位"相近,但在各方面又體現(xiàn)不同。因此,正在修訂的《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》規(guī)定了幾類濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位的行為。由于系統(tǒng)性的缺失存在于法律規(guī)范中,我們?nèi)跃蜎]有建成完整的法律體系。隨著市場(chǎng)主體、經(jīng)濟(jì)成分、利益的多元化,《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》的修訂已經(jīng)具備了基礎(chǔ)條件,《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》適用條件相對(duì)于《反壟斷法》要低,可以更廣泛的保護(hù)經(jīng)營(yíng)者及消費(fèi)者的利益。本文即對(duì)《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》修訂草案送審稿新增法條入手,對(duì)"濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位"的概念及界定進(jìn)行深入分析,并且借鑒外國(guó)及我國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū)立法中的成熟經(jīng)驗(yàn),對(duì)"濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位"概念引入的必要性和可行性進(jìn)行細(xì)致分析,闡釋其對(duì)我國(guó)濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位理論的啟示,即濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位行為需要國(guó)家的積極干預(yù)、制定科學(xué)完善的法律規(guī)定,并保證有嚴(yán)格的法律責(zé)任。最后,提出完善我國(guó)在《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》中規(guī)制濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位的立法建議及規(guī)制辦法,使《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》發(fā)揮其維護(hù)市場(chǎng)交易秩序、促進(jìn)行業(yè)健康發(fā)展的作用。筆者將論文分為四部分。第一部分引用沈陽匯盛美商貿(mào)有限公司與沈陽家樂福超市買賣合同糾紛一案,引出大型零售商濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位行為的概念,并通過該案例擴(kuò)展到對(duì)濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位行為的法律規(guī)制問題。第二部分對(duì)濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位行為進(jìn)行界定。首先給出濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位行為的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和表現(xiàn)形式,從而得出該行為所造成的危害。第三部分對(duì)國(guó)外和我國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū)對(duì)濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位行為法律規(guī)制進(jìn)行參考,從而得出我國(guó)對(duì)該行為規(guī)制的啟示。第四部分綜合探究了我國(guó)規(guī)制濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位行為的完善問題。通過提出立法中的不足,從完善《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》相關(guān)條文、完善對(duì)濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位行為的處罰制度等方面對(duì)規(guī)制濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位行為給出完善建議。
[Abstract]:The regulation of abusing the relative advantage in the legislation of our country mainly exists in the Anti-monopoly Law. However, the high demand of the subject in the Anti-Monopoly Law is not conducive to the regulation of this kind of behavior. Thus affecting the prevention and punishment of this kind of behavior. " Relative advantage position is close to market dominant position, but it is different in every aspect. As a result, the Anti-Unfair Competition Act, which is being amended, provides for several types of abuse of comparative advantage. Because the systematic flaw exists in the legal norm, we still do not have the complete legal system. With the diversification of market subjects, economic components and interests, the revision of the Anti-unfair Competition Law has the basic conditions, and the applicable conditions of the Anti-unfair Competition Law are lower than that of the Anti-monopoly Law. The interests of operators and consumers can be protected more broadly. This paper begins with the new articles of the revised draft of "Anti-unfair Competition Law", analyzes the concept and definition of "abusing the position of comparative advantage", and draws lessons from the mature experience in the legislation of foreign countries and Taiwan. The necessity and feasibility of the introduction of the concept of "abusing the relative advantage" are analyzed in detail, and its enlightenment to the theory of abusing the relative advantage of our country is explained, that is, the abusing of the relative advantage needs the active intervention of the state. Make scientific and perfect laws and regulations and guarantee strict legal liability. Finally, the author puts forward some legislative suggestions and regulatory measures to improve the regulation of abuse of comparative advantage in Anti-unfair Competition Law, so that the Anti-unfair Competition Law can play its role in maintaining the order of market transactions and promoting the healthy development of the industry. The author divides the thesis into four parts. The first part refers to the contract dispute between Shenyang Huishengmei Trading Co., Ltd and Shenyang Carrefour supermarket, which leads to the concept of abuse of comparative advantage by large retailers. The case is extended to the legal regulation of abuse of comparative advantage. The second part defines the behavior of abusing comparative advantage. Firstly, the identification standard and manifestation of abusing the relative advantage position are given, and the harm caused by the behavior is obtained. The third part makes reference to the legal regulation of abuse of comparative advantage in foreign countries and Taiwan area, and draws the enlightenment of our country on the regulation of this behavior. The fourth part comprehensively probes into the perfection of the regulation of abuse of comparative advantage in our country. This paper puts forward some suggestions for regulating abuse of comparative advantage from the following aspects: perfecting the relevant articles of Anti-unfair Competition Law and perfecting the punishment system for abuse of comparative advantage.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李劍;相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位理論質(zhì)疑[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2005年03期

2 王麗娟;梅林;;相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位濫用的反壟斷法研究[J];法學(xué);2006年07期

3 樊綱;競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的核心不是先進(jìn)技術(shù)而是低成本[J];領(lǐng)導(dǎo)決策信息;2002年04期

4 王廣華;;從“進(jìn)場(chǎng)費(fèi)”現(xiàn)象看對(duì)“相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位的濫用”的規(guī)制[J];中山大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)論叢;2006年12期

5 王旭玲;;相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位濫用理論研究[J];科技信息;2010年24期

6 黃明欣;;市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)下高校濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位的法律探析——以反壟斷法為視角[J];武漢科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年06期

7 李劍;;論結(jié)構(gòu)性要素在我國(guó)《反壟斷法》中的基礎(chǔ)地位——相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位濫用理論之否定[J];政治與法律;2009年10期

8 劉建民;;超市通道費(fèi)與相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位法律規(guī)制若干問題探討——四論“零供”關(guān)系的法律調(diào)整[J];上海商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

9 王亞南;;濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位問題的反壟斷法理分析與規(guī)制——以大型零售企業(yè)收取“通道費(fèi)”為切入視角[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年05期

10 張翼飛;;反壟斷法規(guī)制濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位理論“正名”——對(duì)質(zhì)疑說的回應(yīng)[J];理論月刊;2011年09期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 張學(xué)勤;;新舊媒介的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)與合作[A];新媒體：競(jìng)合與共贏[C];2007年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 中建二局三公司黨委書記 張萬賓;著眼特殊差異 保持相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)[N];中華建筑報(bào);2014年

2 本報(bào)記者 張欣;頂聯(lián)網(wǎng)絡(luò)：“相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)”完成“二次助推”[N];計(jì)算機(jī)世界;2003年

3 記者　 俞嘉駿;上海市應(yīng)利用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)吸引人才[N];組織人事報(bào);2006年

4 樊綱 中國(guó)體制改革基金會(huì)秘書長(zhǎng)、中國(guó)國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)研究所所長(zhǎng);經(jīng)濟(jì)走勢(shì)與中國(guó)企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)營(yíng)報(bào);2003年

5 張健秋;運(yùn)價(jià)提高湖北企業(yè)有相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)[N];農(nóng)資導(dǎo)報(bào);2006年

6 記者 林鳳斌;深入研究京津城市規(guī)劃 發(fā)揮相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)加快對(duì)接[N];河北日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

7 國(guó)泰君安 胡春霞　蔣麗絲;中報(bào)行情正在演繹 白酒行業(yè)業(yè)績(jī)相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)顯現(xiàn)[N];通信信息報(bào);2012年

8 何慧娟;“萬商西進(jìn)”我國(guó)中西部地區(qū)相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)上升[N];西部時(shí)報(bào);2007年

9 本報(bào)記者 涂洪長(zhǎng);“萬商西進(jìn)”：中西部相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)上升[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)參考報(bào);2007年

10 本報(bào)記者　劉泉;“我對(duì)中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)充滿信心”[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào)海外版;2003年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 李朔;大型零售商濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位行為規(guī)制研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2016年

2 張潮;相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位濫用法律規(guī)制研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2016年

3 王曉亮;濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位行為的法律規(guī)制研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2017年

4 王艷;相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位濫用的法律規(guī)制[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年

5 張媛;濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位的反壟斷法規(guī)制[D];天津師范大學(xué);2013年

6 王樂萌;大型零售商濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位的法律規(guī)制[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

7 王林文;大型零售商濫用市場(chǎng)相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位行為法律規(guī)制研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

8 李瑩;大型零售商濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位的法律規(guī)制[D];湖南大學(xué);2013年

9 張東;大型零售商濫用市場(chǎng)相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位的法律規(guī)制研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2015年

10 張曉蕾;論濫用相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)地位之反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法規(guī)制[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2043999