本文選題：后危機(jī)時(shí)代 + 巴塞爾Ⅲ��； 參考：《河北法學(xué)》2015年06期

【摘要】：2008年美國次貸危機(jī)不僅給全球經(jīng)濟(jì)帶來非常惡劣的影響,而且暴露了國際銀行監(jiān)管存在的諸多問題。后危機(jī)時(shí)代,各國紛紛反思金融危機(jī)爆發(fā)的原因及缺陷,試圖尋求更穩(wěn)定的金融市場(chǎng)體系。2010年9月,以巴塞爾銀行監(jiān)管委員會(huì)(BCBS)為代表的國際組織通過了新的全球監(jiān)管改革方案,即巴塞爾Ⅲ。該協(xié)議提出新的資本框架、首次引入杠桿率監(jiān)管指標(biāo)和建立宏觀審慎監(jiān)管框架。雖然我國目前已初步建立銀行業(yè)監(jiān)管制度,但與巴塞爾Ⅲ相比,我國銀行業(yè)監(jiān)管制度仍存在諸多缺陷。對(duì)此,根據(jù)國際銀行業(yè)監(jiān)管一體化的要求,提出了巴塞爾Ⅲ框架下完善我國銀行業(yè)監(jiān)管機(jī)制的建議。
[Abstract]:The US subprime mortgage crisis in 2008 not only brought a very bad impact to the global economy, but also exposed many problems in international banking supervision. In the post-crisis era, countries have reflected on the causes and defects of the financial crisis, and tried to find a more stable financial market system. In September 2010, International organizations represented by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) adopted a new global regulatory reform program, Basel III. The agreement proposes a new capital framework, the first introduction of leverage regulatory indicators and the establishment of a macro-prudential regulatory framework. Although China has initially established a banking regulatory system, compared with Basel III, there are still many defects in our banking regulatory system. In view of this, according to the requirement of international banking supervision integration, the paper puts forward some suggestions to perfect the banking supervision mechanism of our country under the framework of Basel 鈪，

本文編號(hào)：1902419