本文選題：旅游 + 旅游輔助者��； 參考：《南京大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：在當(dāng)今世界,旅游行業(yè)素有朝陽產(chǎn)業(yè)之稱,旅游產(chǎn)業(yè)的繁榮旺盛使得各國都將其作為發(fā)展本國經(jīng)濟(jì)的重要方式之一。然而,在旅游消費(fèi)日益繁盛的今天,出現(xiàn)的旅游糾紛現(xiàn)象也日益紛繁復(fù)雜,旅游活動多涉及旅游者、旅行社以及旅游服務(wù)輔助者等多個主體,這就使得互相之間的責(zé)任也趨于復(fù)雜化,尤其是在旅游輔助者造成旅游者人身或財(cái)產(chǎn)損害的情況下,旅行社與旅游輔助者的責(zé)任該如何劃分的問題�，F(xiàn)實(shí)生活中,常常出現(xiàn)旅行社與旅游輔助者互相推諉責(zé)任的現(xiàn)象,同時因我國相關(guān)法律規(guī)定還不夠完善,進(jìn)而也出現(xiàn)了各地法院對類似糾紛案件做出不同處理的現(xiàn)象,這將不利于對旅游者合法權(quán)益的保護(hù)以及整個旅游產(chǎn)業(yè)的健康發(fā)展,于是如何很好地處理此類旅游糾紛案件則成了一個迫切需要予以解決的問題。同時,由于我國正式的《旅游法》剛出臺不久,其對旅行社或者旅游輔助者造成旅游者損害時的責(zé)任承擔(dān)問題進(jìn)行了一定程度上的明確,故本文欲在之前相關(guān)法律已有規(guī)定的基礎(chǔ)上,再結(jié)合新出臺的《旅游法》中的相關(guān)規(guī)定,來對旅游輔助者造成旅游者人身或財(cái)產(chǎn)損害時的責(zé)任承擔(dān)問題進(jìn)行一定的闡述,以期對以后司法實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的此類旅游糾紛案件給予一定的幫助。本文主要分為六個部分:引言主要介紹本文寫作的研究背景與意義,主要包括旅游糾紛的日益繁多以及復(fù)雜化,新出臺的《旅游法》突出對旅游者權(quán)益的保障等;第二部分則從一則案例提出問題,首先介紹案件的基本情況,而后闡述案件的最終判決以及判決的依據(jù),從案例中抽象出文章將要涉及的問題,即旅游輔助者致旅游者人身或財(cái)產(chǎn)損害時的責(zé)任承擔(dān)問題;第三部分主要分析旅游者、旅行社、旅游輔助者三方的法律關(guān)系,分別討論了旅游者與旅行社、旅行社與旅游輔助者、旅游者與旅游輔助者相互之間存在的法律關(guān)系,以方便下文展開對造成旅游者損害的責(zé)任承擔(dān)問題的討論;第四部分則對旅游輔助者的法律地位進(jìn)行說明,首先介紹了旅游輔助者的界定問題,以明確旅游輔助者的身份,排除非旅游輔助者,而后進(jìn)一步討論旅游輔助者的法律地位;第五部分則分析旅游輔助者致旅游者人身或財(cái)產(chǎn)損害時的責(zé)任承擔(dān)問題,本部分采取責(zé)任二分體系,對違約責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任進(jìn)行分開討論,而后對該兩種責(zé)任產(chǎn)生競合的情形進(jìn)行簡單的分析;最后給本文做一總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:In today's world, the tourism industry is known as the sunrise industry, and the prosperity of the tourism industry has made all countries take it as one of the important ways to develop their own economy. However, in the day of the growing tourism consumption, the phenomenon of tourism disputes is increasingly complex, and travel activities involve tourists, travel agencies and tourism services. It makes the responsibility of each other more complicated, especially the problem of how to divide the responsibility of the travel agency and the tourist assistant in the case of the tourist's personal or property damage caused by the tourist assistants. In real life, the phenomenon of passing the responsibility of the travel agency and the tourist assistants often appears in the real life. At the same time, because the relevant laws and regulations of our country are not perfect enough, there is also a phenomenon of different handling of similar disputes in various courts, which will not help the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of tourists and the healthy development of the whole tourism industry. So how to deal with such cases is an urgent need. In order to solve the problem, at the same time, because the official "tourism law" of our country has just come out soon, it has a certain degree of responsibility for the travel agency or tourist assistant caused by tourist damage, so this article will be based on the previous relevant laws, and then combine the relevant regulations of the new tourism law. In order to give some help to the tourist disputes in the future, this article is divided into six parts: the introduction mainly introduces the background and significance of the study, mainly including the tourist disputes. In the second part, the basic situation of the case is introduced, the final judgment of the case and the basis of the judgment are expounded, and the problems that the article will be involved in the case are abstracted from the case, that is, tourism assistants to travel. In the third part, the legal relationship between tourists, travel agencies and tourist assistants is analyzed, and the legal relations between tourists and travel agencies, travel agencies and tourist assistants, tourists and tourist assistants are discussed respectively in the third part. In the fourth part, the legal status of tourist auxiliaries is explained. First, the definition of tourist auxiliaries is introduced to clarify the identity of tourist auxiliaries, to exclude non tourist auxiliaries, and then to further discuss the legal status of tourist auxiliaries, and the fifth part of the analysis of tourism assistants to tourism. In the case of liability for personal or property damage, this part takes the two part of the responsibility system, discusses the liability for breach of contract and the liability of tort separately, and then makes a simple analysis of the situation of the concurrence of the two kinds of responsibilities; finally, a summary is given to this article.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.294

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 黃維中;教育與中國古代官吏的選拔[J];中國人事;1994年06期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 ;大學(xué)生“村官”的角色是輔助者,還是開拓者？[N];農(nóng)民日報(bào);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 高英;旅游輔助者致旅游者損害時的責(zé)任承擔(dān)問題[D];南京大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號：1894542