網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)欺詐行為的法律認(rèn)定
本文選題:網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi) + 欺詐行為。 參考:《吉林大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文
【摘要】:近年來(lái),隨著信息技術(shù)的迅速發(fā)展,網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)已經(jīng)滲透到人們的日常生活當(dāng)中,作為互聯(lián)網(wǎng)時(shí)代的重要組成部分,網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)為我們的交易模式帶來(lái)了日新月異的變化,對(duì)于消費(fèi)者來(lái)說(shuō),一方面網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)具有方便、快捷、全球化等方面的優(yōu)勢(shì);另一方面網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)的虛擬性、非現(xiàn)場(chǎng)性和高技術(shù)性等特點(diǎn)使消費(fèi)者在網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)的過程中更容易受到侵害,網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)欺詐行為首當(dāng)其沖。在我國(guó)現(xiàn)行立法中并沒有對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)欺詐行為有一個(gè)準(zhǔn)確的界定,這就導(dǎo)致了在消費(fèi)者受到網(wǎng)店經(jīng)營(yíng)者的欺詐時(shí),很難依法維權(quán)。因此,筆者在本文中討論了如何對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)欺詐行為進(jìn)行法律認(rèn)定的問題,以此對(duì)該行為有一個(gè)準(zhǔn)確的認(rèn)識(shí),這對(duì)維護(hù)消費(fèi)者的合法權(quán)益,保障網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易的有序進(jìn)行,促進(jìn)網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易的穩(wěn)定發(fā)展有著重要的意義。 本文共分為四個(gè)部分: 第一部分是關(guān)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)欺詐行為的一般理論問題研究。筆者首先從網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)欺詐行為的概念出發(fā),,讓大家了解到什么是網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)欺詐行為。其次對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)欺詐行為的特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行分析,認(rèn)識(shí)到網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)欺詐行為與傳統(tǒng)的購(gòu)物欺詐行為相比有著特殊性。最后闡述網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)欺詐行為形成的原因有三點(diǎn):一是網(wǎng)店經(jīng)營(yíng)者與消費(fèi)者的信息不對(duì)稱;二是網(wǎng)絡(luò)這一交易媒介為欺詐行為提供了便利;三是消費(fèi)者受到欺詐后維權(quán)意識(shí)薄弱及網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)管不力縱容了欺詐的蔓延。 第二部分是對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)欺詐行為主體的認(rèn)定。在網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易中涉及到多方主體,除了經(jīng)營(yíng)者和消費(fèi)者,還有網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供者和物流承擔(dān)者。當(dāng)消費(fèi)者遇到交易糾紛時(shí),這三方主體互相推卸責(zé)任,讓消費(fèi)者維權(quán)產(chǎn)生困難。因此清楚的認(rèn)識(shí)經(jīng)營(yíng)者、網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供者與物流承擔(dān)者之間到底誰(shuí)是欺詐行為的主體顯得十分重要。 第三部分是對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)欺詐行為的主觀要件以及客觀要件的認(rèn)定。網(wǎng)店經(jīng)營(yíng)者在實(shí)施欺詐行為時(shí)的主觀心理是一種故意,這種故意又分為直接故意與間接故意,筆者在對(duì)這兩種故意進(jìn)行分別論述的同時(shí),還分析了因網(wǎng)店經(jīng)營(yíng)者的過失而造成的侵權(quán)行為問題。網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)欺詐行為的客觀方面就是其實(shí)施了一定的行為,這種行為主要有四種:一是發(fā)布虛假信息的行為;二是經(jīng)營(yíng)者單方拒絕履約的行為;三是經(jīng)營(yíng)者進(jìn)行信譽(yù)炒作的行為;四是網(wǎng)絡(luò)釣魚行為。 第四部分是對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)欺詐行為中損害事實(shí)以及因果關(guān)系的認(rèn)定。網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)欺詐行為中的損害事實(shí)是指該行為侵犯了消費(fèi)者的知情權(quán)、自主選擇權(quán)、公平交易權(quán)等權(quán)利。而因果關(guān)系方面的認(rèn)定則是筆者認(rèn)為最難的一部分,該部分筆者借鑒了侵權(quán)行為法以及刑法中關(guān)于因果關(guān)系的知識(shí),對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)欺詐行為中的因果關(guān)系進(jìn)行了事實(shí)上的因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定和法律上因果關(guān)系的認(rèn)定,并闡述了因果關(guān)系對(duì)認(rèn)定欺詐行為的作用所在,意在確定出網(wǎng)店經(jīng)營(yíng)者因欺詐行為而所應(yīng)承擔(dān)的責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:In recent years , with the rapid development of information technology , network consumption has infiltrated people ' s daily life . As an important part of Internet age , network consumption has brought about a new change in our trading mode . For consumers , Internet consumption has the advantages of convenience , shortcut , globalization and so on .
On the other hand , the virtual , non - field and high technical characteristics of network consumption make consumers more vulnerable to the abuse of network consumer fraud . In the current legislation of our country , there is no accurate definition of network consumption fraud . Therefore , the author discusses how to carry out the legal recognition of network consumption fraud . Therefore , the author discusses how to ensure the legitimate rights and interests of consumers , safeguard the orderly progress of network transactions , and promote the stable development of network transactions .
This paper is divided into four parts :
The first part is about the general theory problem of network consumption fraud .
secondly , the transaction medium of the network provides convenience for the fraud ;
Third , the consumer ' s weak consciousness after fraud and the weak network supervision have caused the spread of fraud .
The second part is the identification of the behavior subject of network consumption fraud . In the network transaction , the multi - party main body is involved , besides the operator and the consumer , there are network transaction platform providers and logistics providers . When the consumer encounters a transaction dispute , the three main bodies shirk their responsibilities and make the consumers more difficult . Therefore , it is very important to know who is the main body of the fraud behavior between the provider of the network trading platform and the logistics bearer .
The third part is the subjective element of network consumption fraud and the determination of objective factors . The subjective psychology of network store operators in the implementation of fraud is a deliberate , deliberate and indirect intention , and the author also analyzes the tort caused by the negligence of net store operators . The objective aspect of network consumption fraud is that it carries out certain behavior , which mainly includes four kinds : one is the act of issuing false information ;
Second , the operators unilaterally refuse to perform the performance ;
Third , the business operators conduct reputation - speculation ;
4 . Phishing behavior .
The fourth part is the cognizance of the damage facts and the causation in the behavior of network consumption fraud . The damage facts in the network consumption cheating act refer to the violation of the right of the consumer ' s right to know , the right of independent choice and the right of fair trade .
【學(xué)位授予單位】:吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號(hào)】:D923.8
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 韓洪今;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供商的法律定位[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2009年02期
2 張艷玲;;前電子商務(wù)時(shí)代電子商務(wù)信用炒作行為之法律規(guī)制初探[J];電子商務(wù);2010年01期
3 蘇號(hào)朋;鞠曄;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)欺詐的法律規(guī)制[J];法律適用;2012年01期
4 趙紅梅;;經(jīng)營(yíng)者義務(wù):對(duì)誰(shuí)負(fù)擔(dān)的義務(wù)——《中華人民共和國(guó)消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)法》修訂的社會(huì)法理路[J];法商研究;2010年04期
5 孔東菊;;論懲罰性賠償在我國(guó)立法中的確立和完善——從《消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)法》到《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年08期
6 黎建飛;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)中的法律困境與變革[J];法治研究;2010年05期
7 蘇號(hào)朋;凌學(xué)東;;法國(guó)消費(fèi)欺詐行為的法律規(guī)制及借鑒[J];法學(xué)雜志;2013年04期
8 錢玉文;劉永寶;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費(fèi)欺詐行為的法律規(guī)制[J];法學(xué)雜志;2014年08期
9 劉俊海;徐海燕;;論消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)理念的升華與制度創(chuàng)新——以我國(guó)《消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)法》修改為中心[J];法學(xué)雜志;2013年05期
10 高富平;;在線經(jīng)營(yíng)主體身份認(rèn)證——論我國(guó)在線交易安全解決方案[J];河北法學(xué);2007年04期
本文編號(hào):1760188
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/1760188.html