本文選題：德國 + 一般事故保險　； 參考：《東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：因果關(guān)系的問題一直是法學(xué)理論和實踐領(lǐng)域重要的問題,德國通過兩百多年的時間,在一般事故保險和工傷事故保險中分別確立了自成體系的因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。在一般事故保險中,德國實行"比例化"的因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn);在工傷事故保險中,實行"本質(zhì)條件"說。我國在事故保險中尚沒有明確規(guī)定因果關(guān)系的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn),造成了司法實踐的混亂局面。效仿德國,應(yīng)確立有別于我國民法領(lǐng)域的因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定體系,在一般事故保險中實行"比例化"的因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn),在工傷事故保險中實行"本質(zhì)條件"說的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
[Abstract]:The problem of causality has always been an important problem in the field of legal theory and practice. Through more than 200 years, Germany has established its own standard of causation in general accident insurance and industrial accident insurance respectively.In general accident insurance, Germany carries out the criterion of "proportionality" causality, and in industrial accident insurance, the "essential condition" is applied.There is no definite criterion of causality in accident insurance in our country, which leads to confusion in judicial practice.Following the example of Germany, we should establish the system of causality identification different from that in the field of civil law in our country, implement the criterion of "proportionality" of causality in general accident insurance, and implement the criterion of "essential condition" in industrial accident insurance.
【作者單位】： 遼寧大學(xué)法學(xué)院;中共沈陽市委黨�；A(chǔ)教研部;北京語言大學(xué)研究生院;
【基金】：中共中央黨校全國黨校系統(tǒng)重點(diǎn)調(diào)研課題資助項目(中校廳發(fā)[2017]39號96項)
【分類號】：D951.6;DD912.28

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 楊秀朝;構(gòu)建我國因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定模式之探討[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會發(fā)展;2003年02期

2 劉燕;梁p煵，

本文編號：1753460