本文選題：旅行社　切入點(diǎn)：安全保障義務(wù)　出處：《西南大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 隨著我國(guó)旅游業(yè)的迅速發(fā)展,旅游活動(dòng)已日趨大眾化,旅游法律關(guān)系也日益普遍而復(fù)雜。然而,我國(guó)旅游立法卻相對(duì)滯后,旅游基本法仍然缺位,雖有相關(guān)行政法規(guī)和地方法規(guī),但其立法層次較低,規(guī)定多有沖突,對(duì)旅行社安全保障義務(wù)的規(guī)定也比較少,從而加劇了旅行社對(duì)旅游者的人身和財(cái)產(chǎn)安全的忽視。從目前的法律規(guī)定來(lái)看,旅游行政法規(guī)規(guī)定了旅游行政管理部門安全保障監(jiān)督檢查職責(zé),同時(shí)規(guī)定了旅行社的應(yīng)當(dāng)采取措施確保旅游活動(dòng)安全,另外《消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)法》確定了消費(fèi)者享有安全權(quán)以及經(jīng)營(yíng)者應(yīng)當(dāng)履行安全保障義務(wù),但是一旦旅游安全事故發(fā)生,往往缺少直接、明確和足夠的法律規(guī)范來(lái)解決糾紛,而多是依靠有關(guān)地方政府的政策和態(tài)度處理事故責(zé)任。 安全在社會(huì)生活中受到普遍關(guān)注,是法律自身的價(jià)值之一,為法律所追求和保障。安全保障義務(wù)就是法律為了維護(hù)社會(huì)生活的安全所創(chuàng)設(shè),并貫穿于諸多社會(huì)生活領(lǐng)域的制度。我國(guó)最高人民法院公布的《關(guān)于審理人身?yè)p害賠償案件適用法律若干問(wèn)題的解釋》第六條直接規(guī)定了安全保障義務(wù)。旅行社的安全保障義務(wù)是安全保障義務(wù)的一種具體形態(tài),它是旅行社對(duì)旅游者的人身、財(cái)產(chǎn)所負(fù)有的安全關(guān)照義務(wù)。 保障旅游者在旅行過(guò)程中的人身、財(cái)產(chǎn)安全是旅游合同的基礎(chǔ)性義務(wù),是滿足旅游者通過(guò)參與旅游活動(dòng)、獲得身心愉悅的根本保證。旅行社必須采取必要措施確保旅游者人身、財(cái)產(chǎn)安全不被侵害。不過(guò),這一義務(wù)有特定的時(shí)空限制,即只在旅行社和旅游者之間的旅游合同關(guān)系存續(xù)期間存在,旅游合同關(guān)系結(jié)束,旅行社安全保障義務(wù)隨之結(jié)束。旅行社怠于履行這一義務(wù)而造成旅游者人身、財(cái)權(quán)權(quán)益損害的,應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)積極施救、損害賠償?shù)确韶?zé)任。 鑒于我國(guó)旅游立法滯后的現(xiàn)狀,要落實(shí)安全保障義務(wù),切實(shí)保護(hù)旅游者的人身、財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益,就必須完善我國(guó)旅游法律制度。筆者建議,從制定旅游基本法著手,結(jié)合旅游合同、旅游保險(xiǎn)、旅游安全標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化和旅游事故賠償,包括精神損害賠償?shù)?進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的法律規(guī)制。將旅行社的安全保障義務(wù)具體化、明確化,敦促旅行社重視旅游者的人身、財(cái)產(chǎn)安全,重塑旅行社和旅游者之間的和諧關(guān)系,促進(jìn)旅游業(yè)健康和諧發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of tourism in China, tourism activities have become more and more popular, and the legal relationship of tourism has become increasingly common and complex. However, the tourism legislation of our country lags behind, and the basic law on tourism is still absent. Although there are relevant administrative regulations and local laws and regulations, their legislative levels are relatively low, most of the provisions are in conflict, and the provisions on the safety and security obligations of travel agencies are also relatively few. This has aggravated the neglect of the personal and property safety of tourists by travel agencies. Judging from the current laws and regulations, tourism administrative regulations stipulate the duties of security supervision and inspection of tourism administrative departments. At the same time, it stipulates that travel agencies should take measures to ensure the safety of tourism activities. In addition, the Law on Protection of Consumer Rights and interests determines that consumers have the right to safety and the operators should fulfil their obligations of safety and security, but once a tourist safety accident occurs, There is often a lack of direct, clear and sufficient legal norms to resolve disputes, and most of them rely on the policies and attitudes of local governments to deal with the responsibility of accidents. Security is a common concern in social life, is one of the values of the law itself, for the pursuit and protection of the law. The duty of security is the creation of the law in order to maintain the safety of social life. And run through the system in many fields of social life. Article 6 of the interpretation of the applicable Law on the trial of personal injury compensation cases promulgated by the Supreme people's Court of China provides directly the duty of safety and security. Is a specific form of security obligation, It is the travel agency to the tourist's person, the property has the security care duty. To protect the person and property security of tourists in the course of travel is the basic obligation of the tourism contract, and is to satisfy the tourists by participating in tourism activities. Travel agencies must take the necessary measures to ensure that tourists' personal and property safety are not infringed upon. However, this obligation has specific temporal and spatial limitations. That is, only during the existence of the tourism contract relationship between the travel agency and the tourist, the tourism contract relationship ends, and the travel agency security obligation ends. The travel agency is lazy to fulfill this obligation and causes damage to the tourists' personal and financial rights and interests. Legal liability shall be borne for active rescue and compensation for damages. In view of the lagging status of tourism legislation in our country, in order to implement the duty of safety and security and to protect the rights and interests of tourists, we must improve the legal system of tourism in our country. The author suggests that we should start with the formulation of the basic law on tourism. Combined with tourism contract, tourism insurance, tourism safety standardization and compensation for tourism accidents, including compensation for mental injury, the system of legal regulation is carried out. It urges travel agencies to attach importance to the personal and property safety of tourists, to reshape the harmonious relationship between travel agencies and tourists, and to promote the healthy and harmonious development of tourism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 曹曉雪;我國(guó)旅游消費(fèi)者權(quán)益的法律保護(hù)研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2012年

2 唐云龍;旅游經(jīng)營(yíng)者安全保障義務(wù)研究[D];新疆大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1676271