本文選題：就業(yè)形勢(shì)　切入點(diǎn)：人才流動(dòng)機(jī)制　出處：《中國(guó)科技論壇》2016年11期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：正近日,北京等地相繼發(fā)布了"網(wǎng)約車經(jīng)營(yíng)服務(wù)管理辦法征求意見稿",引發(fā)輿論關(guān)注,贊成者有之,反對(duì)者也甚眾。這次的"意見稿"除規(guī)定車型與排量外,最大的爭(zhēng)議還在于"網(wǎng)約車輛須限制為當(dāng)?shù)嘏普?"網(wǎng)約車司機(jī)須限制為當(dāng)?shù)貞艏?。那么"雙限"的政策意圖何在?嘗試分析如下:首先是就業(yè)機(jī)會(huì)分配問題。在我國(guó),對(duì)于科技人才和技能型人才的就業(yè),戶籍限制已經(jīng)被基本打破,跨省市人才流動(dòng)機(jī)制較為完備,大中城市引入高端人才并不會(huì)給當(dāng)?shù)鼐蜆I(yè)形勢(shì)帶來(lái)什么負(fù)面沖擊,反而是創(chuàng)新與活
[Abstract]:Just recently, Beijing and other places have issued a "service network management solutions about the car draft, causing public concern, in favor of those who have, the opponents are also very public. The" draft "in addition to the provisions of the models with the largest displacement, the dispute is" net about vehicle shall be restricted to the local "licence" net about car drivers shall be limited to the local household registration. Then the "double limit" policy intentions? Try analysis is as follows: first, employment allocation problem. In our country, the technical personnel and skilled personnel employment, household registration restrictions have been basically broken, inter provincial talent flow mechanism is complete, large and medium-sized city into high-end talent will bring what negative impact to the local employment situation, it is innovation and live

【分類號(hào)】：D922.296
，

本文編號(hào)：1649426