本文選題：朱萬(wàn)興　切入點(diǎn)：汽車消費(fèi)　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著人們生活水平的不斷提高,汽車重要性逐漸的凸顯出來(lái),但是在汽車給我?guī)?lái)便利的同時(shí)也給我們的生活帶來(lái)了許多的負(fù)面影響。家庭消費(fèi)汽車的過(guò)程,由于汽車這種產(chǎn)品的高科技性與特殊性,時(shí)常給我們的家庭帶來(lái)不可避免的糾紛,尤其是經(jīng)營(yíng)者們?yōu)榱双@得更多的非法利益,在汽車銷售的過(guò)程中“以舊當(dāng)新”的方式欺詐消費(fèi)者,嚴(yán)重侵害了消費(fèi)者合法權(quán)益。而對(duì)于這種汽車消費(fèi)過(guò)程的欺詐行為在實(shí)踐中很難認(rèn)定,已經(jīng)成為我國(guó)法院審判過(guò)程中的一個(gè)難點(diǎn)問題。本文主要分為四個(gè)部分,對(duì)朱興萬(wàn)汽車消費(fèi)維權(quán)案件進(jìn)行具體的分析：第一章具體介紹朱興萬(wàn)汽車銷售維權(quán)這個(gè)案件,找出該案件中的爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)問題。第二章分析本案件中糾紛的性質(zhì)及其在審理過(guò)程中法院所適用的法律。第三章主要對(duì)這案件的焦點(diǎn)問題進(jìn)行法律分析。通過(guò)具體分析懲罰性賠償?shù)臉?gòu)成要件及其欺詐的認(rèn)定,及其對(duì)比其他案件的方式,分析本案的焦點(diǎn)問題。第四章通過(guò)對(duì)朱興萬(wàn)案件的分析,對(duì)我國(guó)的懲罰性賠償制度進(jìn)行反思,提出自己的意見。
[Abstract]:With the continuous improvement of people's living standards, the importance of automobile is gradually highlighted, but the automobile brings me convenience and also brings many negative effects to our life. Because of the high-tech nature and particularity of this product, automobile often brings inevitable disputes to our families, especially the operators in order to obtain more illegal benefits. In the process of automobile sale, the consumers are fraudulently fraudulently "old as new", which seriously infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of consumers. However, it is difficult to identify the fraudulent behavior in the process of automobile consumption in practice. It has become a difficult problem in the course of court trial in our country. This paper is mainly divided into four parts, which analyzes the case of Zhu Xingwan's auto consumption rights. The first chapter introduces the case of Zhu Xingwan's auto sales rights. Chapter two analyzes the nature of the dispute in this case and the law applicable to the court during the trial. Chapter 3 mainly analyzes the focus of the case. Analysis of the elements of punitive damages and the identification of fraud, The fourth chapter, through the analysis of Zhu Xingwan case, reflects on the punitive damages system of our country and puts forward its own opinions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王毓瑩;;論《消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)法》的適用范圍[J];法律適用;2013年02期

2 屈茂輝;胡薔薇;;我國(guó)消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)法調(diào)整范圍的修正[J];湖南師范大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 梁慧星（中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院法學(xué)所研究員）;[N];人民法院報(bào);2001年

，

本文編號(hào)：1647331