本文選題：行政壟斷　切入點：反壟斷　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 市場經(jīng)濟的核心與靈魂是公平和競爭的競爭。而行政壟斷是行政主體濫用行政權(quán)力,運用強制手段排斥、限制或妨礙合法競爭,破壞社會主義市場經(jīng)濟競爭關(guān)系,侵害市場公平競爭秩序的行為。改革開放以來政治體制改革的相對滯后,國家權(quán)力下放后控權(quán)舉措的根本缺失,使行政壟斷問題逐漸成為中國市場經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的重大障礙,具有嚴重的社會危害性,所以當(dāng)前學(xué)界普遍認為“中國反壟斷的主要任務(wù)是反行政壟斷”。國家為了社會的整體利益和長遠利益,走上了反行政壟斷的漫長征途,從1980年國務(wù)院發(fā)布的《競爭十條》第一次提出了反行政壟斷的任務(wù)以來,國家出臺了眾多與反行政壟斷有關(guān)的法律法規(guī)和其他規(guī)范性文件,但在現(xiàn)實生活中許多條款形同虛設(shè)、功效甚微。 2007年8月30日,十屆全國人大常委會第二十九次會議經(jīng)表決通過反壟斷法,這意味著,經(jīng)過13年之久的爭議和打磨,反壟斷法終于塵埃落定,并于2008年8月1日起施行。該法以專章形式規(guī)制濫用行政權(quán)力限制競爭行為,但是還不是很完善,有諸多問題沒有解決或者解決的不好。如何真正有效地規(guī)制行政壟斷,全面研究和準確把握行政壟斷,消除行政壟斷的消極影響是亟待解決的問題。 本文對中國的行政壟斷問題進行了全面深入的分析和論述,并提出了一系列解決中國轉(zhuǎn)型時期行政壟斷問題的具體措施。全文從以下三個方面對行政壟斷展開了論述。 第一章,是對行政壟斷進行總體上的介紹和闡釋。首先,對行政壟斷的概念加以界定;其次,對行政壟斷的特征加以分析,揭示了行政壟斷與經(jīng)濟壟斷的區(qū)別。再次,根據(jù)辯證唯物主義的“內(nèi)外因原理”,對行政壟斷的產(chǎn)生成因進行深入探究,包括歷史傳統(tǒng)、現(xiàn)實因素、經(jīng)濟根源、法制缺陷。最后,綜合分析行政壟斷對市場競爭、經(jīng)濟自由、政治和社會的巨大危害。 第二章,筆者對國外行政壟斷法律規(guī)制的歷史和現(xiàn)狀進行考察分析。東歐地區(qū)國家和前蘇聯(lián)地區(qū)國家在體制轉(zhuǎn)型時期與我國有著相似的經(jīng)歷,它們從轉(zhuǎn)型之初起就致力通過立法來規(guī)制行政壟斷,大都有專門的反壟斷法,并將反行政壟斷作為重要組成部分；設(shè)置了專門的層級較高的反壟斷機構(gòu),具有較高的權(quán)威性和獨立性;同時對行政壟斷的實施者處以較為嚴厲的法律責(zé)任。這些經(jīng)驗都是值得我們借鑒的。 第三章筆者將目光集中在影響法律規(guī)制行政壟斷效益的法律內(nèi)因上,分析了我國反行政壟斷的立法現(xiàn)狀和存在問題。本章主要從完善反壟斷法、行政法和公共事業(yè)法對行政壟斷的規(guī)制三個方面進行論述,提出要整體推進,分步構(gòu)建,形成統(tǒng)一協(xié)調(diào)行政壟斷法律規(guī)制體系。只有這樣,才能更有效地約束行政權(quán)力運行,維護市場公平競爭秩序。
[Abstract]:The core and soul of the market economy are fair and competitive competition, while administrative monopoly is the abuse of administrative power by administrative subjects, exclusion by coercive means, restriction or hindrance of legitimate competition, and destruction of the competitive relationship of socialist market economy. The behavior of infringing on the order of fair competition in the market. The relative lag in the reform of the political system since the reform and opening up, and the fundamental absence of the measures of controlling power after the decentralization of state power, have gradually made the issue of administrative monopoly a major obstacle to the development of China's market economy. Because of its serious social harmfulness, it is generally believed that "the main task of anti-monopoly in China is to fight administrative monopoly". For the sake of the overall and long-term interests of the society, the country has embarked on a long journey of anti-administrative monopoly. Since 1980, when the State Council first put forward the task of anti-administrative monopoly, the State has issued many laws, regulations and other normative documents related to the anti-administrative monopoly. It has little effect. In August 30th 2007, the 29th session of the standing Committee of the Tenth National people's Congress passed the Anti-monopoly Law by vote. This means that after 13 years of controversy and grinding, the anti-monopoly law has finally been settled. The law regulates the abuse of administrative power to limit competition in the form of a special chapter, but it is not perfect, there are many problems that have not been solved or solved, and how to regulate the administrative monopoly effectively. It is an urgent problem to study and accurately grasp the administrative monopoly and eliminate the negative influence of the administrative monopoly. This paper makes a thorough analysis and discussion on the issue of administrative monopoly in China, and puts forward a series of concrete measures to solve the problem of administrative monopoly in the transitional period of China. The full text discusses the administrative monopoly from the following three aspects. The first chapter is the general introduction and interpretation of administrative monopoly. Firstly, it defines the concept of administrative monopoly; secondly, it analyzes the characteristics of administrative monopoly and reveals the difference between administrative monopoly and economic monopoly. According to the "internal and external cause principle" of dialectical materialism, the causes of the administrative monopoly are deeply explored, including historical tradition, realistic factors, economic root, legal defects. Finally, the comprehensive analysis of the administrative monopoly on the market competition, economic freedom, The great danger of politics and society. In the second chapter, the author investigates and analyzes the history and present situation of the legal regulation of foreign administrative monopoly. The countries of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union have similar experiences with our country in the period of system transformation. From the beginning of the transition, they have been trying to regulate administrative monopoly through legislation, most of them have special anti-monopoly law, and take the anti-administrative monopoly as an important part, and set up a special anti-monopoly agency with a higher level. It has higher authority and independence, at the same time impose more severe legal liability on the executors of administrative monopoly. These experiences are worthy of our reference. In the third chapter, the author focuses on the internal causes of the legal regulation of the benefit of administrative monopoly, and analyzes the current situation and existing problems of anti-administrative monopoly legislation in China. Administrative law and public utility law discuss three aspects of the regulation of administrative monopoly, and put forward that the administrative monopoly should be promoted as a whole, constructed step by step, and formed a unified and coordinated legal regulation system of administrative monopoly. Only in this way, can the administrative power be restricted more effectively. To maintain fair competition in the market.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：D922.294

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 馬征程;試論消除行政壟斷的策略選擇[D];昆明理工大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1600047