本文關(guān)鍵詞： 外資并購(gòu) 壟斷 法律規(guī)制 對(duì)策　出處：《江南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：20世紀(jì)80年代以后,以跨國(guó)并購(gòu)為主的并購(gòu)浪潮對(duì)世界經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展產(chǎn)生了深遠(yuǎn)的影響。各個(gè)國(guó)家的企業(yè)為了能在世界經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的浪潮中占有一席之地,紛紛展開了外資并購(gòu)的步伐。中國(guó)加入WTO以后,我國(guó)日益成熟的市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)制度、GDP的大幅度增長(zhǎng)和逐步完善的法律制度使我國(guó)企業(yè)成為外資并購(gòu)的首選目標(biāo)。伴隨著外資并購(gòu)的大規(guī)模發(fā)展,如何合理的利用外資,提升國(guó)內(nèi)企業(yè)的市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力；維護(hù)國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)安全并對(duì)外資并購(gòu)形成的壟斷問題進(jìn)行合理規(guī)制是我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展過程中必須要解決的主要問題。外資并購(gòu)的壟斷規(guī)制作為世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究中的一個(gè)熱點(diǎn)話題,其所涉及的法律問題和經(jīng)濟(jì)問題十分廣泛。目前學(xué)界對(duì)該課題的研究大多僅從單一的法學(xué)或經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的角度進(jìn)行分析,很少有文章能夠綜合運(yùn)用法學(xué)和經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的知識(shí)對(duì)壟斷問題進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的研究。因此,目前我國(guó)有關(guān)外資并購(gòu)的壟斷規(guī)制的理論研究還存在很大的不足。我國(guó)作為一個(gè)發(fā)展中國(guó)家,經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展正處于轉(zhuǎn)型期,社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)和其他國(guó)家存在明顯的差異。因此,在立法和司法的過程中絕不能照抄照搬國(guó)外做法,在完善我國(guó)的壟斷規(guī)制時(shí),必須立足于我國(guó)的國(guó)情對(duì)歐美發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)進(jìn)行選擇性的借鑒。本文就是在這樣的背景下對(duì)外資并購(gòu)的壟斷規(guī)制展開了研究,并綜合運(yùn)用了案例分析法、比較分析法等多種研究方法。文章共包括五個(gè)部分。第一章緒論介紹了研究的背景及意義、研究思路和研究方法；第二章首先對(duì)外資并購(gòu)的相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行了介紹,然后分析了外資并購(gòu)中壟斷形成的動(dòng)因以及壟斷會(huì)造成的負(fù)面影響,指出了壟斷會(huì)影響社會(huì)福利,并容易產(chǎn)生企業(yè)之間的合謀從而擾亂市場(chǎng)的公平競(jìng)爭(zhēng)。最后本章對(duì)外資并購(gòu)的相關(guān)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)理論進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)歸納,主要分析了哈佛學(xué)派和芝加哥學(xué)派所主張的不同的觀點(diǎn)對(duì)美國(guó)當(dāng)時(shí)期有關(guān)企業(yè)并購(gòu)立法的影響；第三章介紹了外資并購(gòu)以及壟斷規(guī)制的現(xiàn)狀,本章首先分析了近幾年外資并購(gòu)的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀以及發(fā)展趨勢(shì),闡述了外資并購(gòu)給我國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展帶來的積極影響和消極影響。然后通過簡(jiǎn)單介紹近幾年外資并購(gòu)的典型案例及商務(wù)部的審查決定分析了我國(guó)目前外資并購(gòu)壟斷規(guī)制的現(xiàn)狀。最后本章從相關(guān)市場(chǎng)界定、國(guó)家安全審查、經(jīng)營(yíng)者集中的認(rèn)定以及政府規(guī)制失靈等方面分析了我國(guó)對(duì)外資并購(gòu)壟斷規(guī)制的不足。第四章運(yùn)用前文提到的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)理論對(duì)商務(wù)部附加限制性條件批準(zhǔn)的“沃爾瑪收購(gòu)1號(hào)店”的案例進(jìn)行了并購(gòu)動(dòng)因以及反競(jìng)爭(zhēng)效果分析,并論證了前文提出的我國(guó)對(duì)外資并購(gòu)壟斷規(guī)制中存在的問題。第五章主要從法律規(guī)制的角度根據(jù)前文提出的我國(guó)外資并購(gòu)壟斷規(guī)制的不足從相關(guān)市場(chǎng)界定、國(guó)家安全審查、經(jīng)營(yíng)者集中的認(rèn)定和政府規(guī)制失靈四個(gè)方面提出了相應(yīng)的完善對(duì)策。
[Abstract]:Since 1980s, the wave of M & A, which is dominated by transnational mergers and acquisitions, has had a profound impact on the development of the world economy. In order to be able to occupy a place in the wave of world economic development, After China's entry into WTO, With the rapid growth of GDP and the gradual improvement of legal system, our country's increasingly mature market economy system makes our enterprises become the first choice of foreign capital M & A. with the large-scale development of foreign capital M & A, how to utilize foreign capital reasonably, Enhancing the market competitiveness of domestic enterprises; Maintenance of national economic security and reasonable regulation of monopoly problems formed by foreign capital mergers and acquisitions are the main problems that must be solved in the process of economic development of our country. The monopoly regulation of foreign capital mergers and acquisitions is a hot topic in the study of world economy. It involves a wide range of legal and economic issues. At present, most of the academic research on this subject is only from the point of view of a single law or economics. Few articles can use the knowledge of law and economics to study the monopoly problem systematically. Therefore, the theoretical research on monopoly regulation of foreign capital M & A in our country is still very insufficient. As a developing country, China is a developing country. Economic development is in the transition period, and there are obvious differences between the operation of social economy and other countries. Therefore, in the process of legislation and judicature, we must not copy and copy foreign practices, while perfecting the monopoly regulation of our country. We must base ourselves on the situation of our country to selectively draw lessons from the advanced experience of the developed countries in Europe and the United States. This paper studies the monopoly regulation of foreign capital M & A under this background, and makes use of the case analysis method synthetically. The first chapter introduces the background and significance of the research, the research ideas and research methods. The second chapter introduces the related concepts of foreign capital mergers and acquisitions. Then it analyzes the causes of monopoly formation and the negative impact of monopoly in foreign M & A, and points out that monopoly will affect social welfare. And it is easy to produce collusion among enterprises to disrupt the fair competition of the market. Finally, this chapter systematically summarizes the relevant economic theories of foreign capital mergers and acquisitions. This paper mainly analyzes the influence of the different viewpoints of Harvard School and Chicago School on the legislation of M & A in the United States. Chapter three introduces the current situation of foreign M & A and monopoly regulation. This chapter first analyzes the current situation and development trend of foreign M & A in recent years. This paper expounds the positive and negative effects of foreign capital M & A on China's industrial development. Then, by introducing the typical cases of foreign capital M & A in recent years and the examination decision of the Ministry of Commerce, this paper analyzes the monopoly rules of foreign capital M & A in China. Finally, this chapter defines the relevant markets, National security review, The identification of the concentration of operators and the failure of government regulation are analyzed in this paper. Chapter 4th: "Walmart approved by the Ministry of Commerce with restrictive conditions approved by the Economic Theory mentioned in Chapter 4th. The case of the purchase of No.1 store analyzes the motivation of M & A and the anti-competitive effect. Chapter 5th defines the monopoly regulation of foreign capital M & A from the perspective of legal regulation from the point of view of legal regulation from the relevant market, national security review. The identification of concentration of operators and the failure of government regulation four aspects of the corresponding improvement countermeasures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;中國(guó)年內(nèi)陸續(xù)出臺(tái)外資并購(gòu)等法規(guī)[J];中國(guó)橡膠;2002年20期

2 何焰;關(guān)于我國(guó)外資并購(gòu)的若干法律思考[J];天津市政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期

3 陳永生;新政策環(huán)境下外資并購(gòu)國(guó)有企業(yè)的思考[J];勝利油田黨校學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

4 廉恩臣;;對(duì)外資并購(gòu)應(yīng)加強(qiáng)法律規(guī)制[J];法人雜志;2006年05期

5 黃俊峰;;外資并購(gòu)引發(fā)擔(dān)憂《反壟斷法》出臺(tái)與否存在爭(zhēng)議[J];中國(guó)石油和化工;2006年06期

6 金伯生;;外資并購(gòu)新規(guī)定七大看點(diǎn)[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號(hào)：1540807