反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)探論
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-01-25 01:12
本文關(guān)鍵詞: 反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán) 不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為 一般條款 出處:《南京師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】:為保護(hù)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)條件下的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán),我國(guó)出臺(tái)了一系列知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法規(guī),如《著作權(quán)法》、《商標(biāo)法》、《專利法》,并且依照我國(guó)市場(chǎng)形勢(shì)進(jìn)行了多次修訂,對(duì)我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)發(fā)揮著重要作用。但隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)信息技術(shù)的高速發(fā)展,大數(shù)據(jù)、大平臺(tái)、云應(yīng)用等技術(shù)日新月異,各種創(chuàng)新性智力創(chuàng)造層出不窮,這種新型技術(shù)和智力成果的出現(xiàn),給我國(guó)法律帶來(lái)了很大挑戰(zhàn)。傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法側(cè)重于保護(hù)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán),由于這種偏重性,使得其對(duì)市場(chǎng)上出現(xiàn)的各種矛盾、問(wèn)題、形勢(shì)不能有很好的適應(yīng)能力,缺乏一定的靈活性,從而需要其他法律,現(xiàn)階段也就是《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》來(lái)進(jìn)行補(bǔ)充和兜底。本文從三個(gè)方面闡述《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)。文章第一部分分析了反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的必要性。從知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為現(xiàn)狀、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法對(duì)新型權(quán)利客體保護(hù)的不足來(lái)剖析新形勢(shì)下,需要《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》來(lái)對(duì)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)中出現(xiàn)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行規(guī)制,必須由傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)以外的法律(也就是《不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》)來(lái)彌補(bǔ)這種不足。文章第二部分,研究了反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)過(guò)程中存在的問(wèn)題。首先分析不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為類型對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的限制,詳述反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法中的行為類型制約著知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù),也為文章第三部分闡述擴(kuò)充不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為留下伏筆。同時(shí)文章對(duì)傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法和《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》競(jìng)合時(shí)存在的適用問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了探討,論述了《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》保護(hù)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)時(shí)所存在的限制因素。第三部分就現(xiàn)階段如何完善反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)提出建議。首先提出,目前《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》所規(guī)定的不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為規(guī)定有限,影響了法律對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù),應(yīng)該在原有基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為進(jìn)行擴(kuò)展,完善不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為的內(nèi)容。這一部分還對(duì)法律競(jìng)合時(shí)的適用原則進(jìn)行了討論,分析特殊法和一般法的適用原則,再分析《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》和傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法在法律競(jìng)合時(shí)應(yīng)該怎么適用,最后從立法層面,談到對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的立法保護(hù),認(rèn)為立法上,首先應(yīng)該增加《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》一般條款,然后增加懲罰性賠償條款,增加侵權(quán)人的違法成本,再就是在法律條款中完善反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為內(nèi)容,最后提出在全國(guó)建立強(qiáng)有力的不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為執(zhí)法機(jī)關(guān)。
[Abstract]:In order to protect the intellectual property rights in the market economy, China has issued a series of intellectual property laws and regulations, such as the copyright Law, the Trademark Law, and the Patent Law, which have been revised many times according to the market situation of our country. But with the rapid development of Internet information technology, big data, big platform, cloud application and other technologies are changing with each passing day. The emergence of this new technology and intellectual achievements has brought great challenges to the law of our country. The traditional intellectual property law focuses on the protection of intellectual property rights, because of this emphasis, it makes the market appear a variety of contradictions. The problem is that the situation does not have the ability to adapt well and lacks some flexibility, thus requiring other laws. This article expounds the protection of intellectual property rights in Anti-unfair Competition Law from three aspects. The first part of the article analyzes the knowledge of Anti-unfair Competition Law. The necessity of property right protection. From the current situation of unfair competition in the field of intellectual property. Under the new situation, it is necessary to regulate the unfair competition of intellectual property in the market economy. This deficiency must be remedied by laws other than traditional intellectual property rights (i.e. unfair Competition Act). This paper studies the problems existing in the process of the protection of intellectual property rights in the process of anti-unfair competition law. Firstly, it analyzes the restrictions of the types of unfair competition behavior on the protection of intellectual property rights. The types of conduct in the anti-unfair competition law restrict the protection of intellectual property rights. At the same time, the paper discusses the application of traditional intellectual property law and Anti-unfair Competition Law. This paper discusses the restrictive factors existing in the protection of intellectual property rights in Anti-unfair Competition Law. The third part puts forward some suggestions on how to improve the protection of intellectual property rights under the Anti-unfair Competition Law at the present stage. At present, the provisions of unfair competition act stipulated in the Anti-unfair Competition Law are limited, which have affected the protection of intellectual property rights by law, and should be expanded on the basis of the original law. Improve the content of unfair competition behavior. This part also discusses the applicable principles when the law is competing, and analyzes the applicable principles of special law and general law. Then it analyzes how to apply the Anti-unfair Competition Law and the traditional intellectual property Law when the law is competing. Finally, from the legislative level, it discusses the legislative protection of intellectual property rights, and thinks that the legislation should be applied. First of all, the general provisions of Anti-unfair Competition Law should be added, then punitive damages clauses should be added to increase the illegal costs of the infringers, and then to improve the content of anti-unfair competition behavior in the legal provisions. Finally, the establishment of a strong unfair competition law enforcement agencies in the country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號(hào)】:D922.294
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 鄭友德;萬(wàn)志前;;論商標(biāo)法和反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法對(duì)商標(biāo)權(quán)益的平行保護(hù)[J];法商研究;2009年06期
,本文編號(hào):1461565
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/1461565.html
最近更新
教材專著