本文關(guān)鍵詞：公司對外擔(dān)保的法律效力研究　出處：《上海師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 對外擔(dān)保 規(guī)范屬性 審查義務(wù) 公司章程 越權(quán)擔(dān)保

【摘要】：公司對外擔(dān)保效力問題一直是司法界和實務(wù)界爭議不斷的問題。原因在于作為唯一規(guī)定公司對外擔(dān)保問題的《公司法》第16條及其之后的司法解釋并沒有明確規(guī)定違規(guī)對外擔(dān)保合同的效力認(rèn)定問題,這就需要法官在司法實踐中對《公司法》第16條進行解釋,但是釋法的過程會帶有法官明顯的個人色彩,再加上對外擔(dān)保合同的效力認(rèn)定影響因素較多,這就導(dǎo)致了現(xiàn)實生活中“同案異判”的情形時有發(fā)生。毫無疑問這樣會極大地影響司法的公信力和經(jīng)濟主體開展正常的經(jīng)營活動。司法裁判者在判決對外擔(dān)保合同效力時往往先會根據(jù)自己的法學(xué)知識和素養(yǎng)判斷《公司法》第16條的規(guī)范屬性,那么規(guī)范屬性的判斷就與對外擔(dān)保合同的效力緊密的聯(lián)系在了一起。在市場經(jīng)濟越來越發(fā)達的今天,對外擔(dān)保已經(jīng)變得越來越普遍。公司對外擔(dān)保是公司以自己的財產(chǎn)償還他人債務(wù)的行為,表面上看與商事行為的目的盈利即賺取利潤背道而馳,但其行為背后的利弊卻鮮有人知。帶著這些問題,本文作者首先分析了對外擔(dān)保合同的內(nèi)涵及其利弊,并指出本文所研究的公司擔(dān)保問題主要是公司對外擔(dān)保的問題,對內(nèi)擔(dān)保因其法律風(fēng)險較小和法律爭議不大而不是本文主要的研究問題。其次,本文作者試圖解讀不同時期公司法就對外擔(dān)保問題的立法規(guī)定,以探究不同時期立法者的立法目的和立法態(tài)度。緊接著,作者比較了域外大陸法系和英美法系國家在對外擔(dān)保問題上的態(tài)度以期對我國對外擔(dān)保制度提供有益借鑒。在此基礎(chǔ)上,作者將本文的重點放在了《公司法》16條規(guī)范屬性的探討以及影響公司對外擔(dān)保合同效力認(rèn)定的問題分析上,最后提出了自己的法律意見和建議。鑒于此,本文作者通過正文五章來詳細論述司法實務(wù)界和理論界在公司對外擔(dān)保問題上存在的爭議并提出本文作者自己的觀點。
[Abstract]:The validity of the company's foreign guarantee has always been a controversial issue in the judicial and practical circles. The reason is that article 16 of the company law and its subsequent judicial interpretation are not clear. The determination of the validity of the foreign guarantee contract in violation of the regulations. This requires the judge to interpret Article 16 of the Company Law in judicial practice, but the process of interpretation will have an obvious personal color of the judge, plus the foreign guarantee contract of the effectiveness of the more influential factors. This has led to a "different verdict" in real life. There is no doubt that this will greatly affect the credibility of the judiciary and economic subjects to carry out normal business activities. Judge the normative attribute of Article 16 of Company Law. So the judgment of normative attributes is closely related to the effectiveness of the external guarantee contract. Today, the market economy is more and more developed. External guarantee has become more and more common. External guarantee is the behavior of company to repay other people's debts with its own property. On the face of it, it is contrary to the purpose of commercial behavior to make profits. However, the advantages and disadvantages behind the behavior are rarely known. With these problems, the author first analyzes the connotation of the external guarantee contract and its advantages and disadvantages. It also points out that the company guarantee problem studied in this paper is mainly the issue of the company's external guarantee, and the internal guarantee is not the main research problem of this article because of its small legal risk and little legal dispute. The author tries to interpret the legislative provisions of the Company Law on the issue of foreign guarantee in different periods in order to explore the legislative purpose and legislative attitude of legislators in different periods. The author compares the attitude of the countries of the civil law system and the common law system on the issue of foreign guarantee in order to provide a useful reference for the foreign guarantee system of our country. The author focuses on the discussion of the 16 normative attributes of Company Law and the analysis of the problems affecting the validity of the company's foreign guarantee contract. Finally, the author puts forward his own legal opinions and suggestions, in view of this. Through the five chapters of the text, the author discusses in detail the disputes existing in the field of judicial practice and the theoretical circle on the issue of the company's external guarantee, and puts forward the author's own point of view.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭志京;;中國公司對外擔(dān)保規(guī)則特殊性研究——兼論民法商法思維方式的對立統(tǒng)一[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2014年05期

2 曾大鵬;;公司越權(quán)對外擔(dān)保的效力研究——基于法律解釋方法之檢討[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2013年05期

3 李建偉;;公司非關(guān)聯(lián)性商事?lián)５囊?guī)范適用分析[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2013年03期

4 高圣平;;公司擔(dān)保相關(guān)法律問題研究[J];中國法學(xué);2013年02期

5 梁上上;;公司擔(dān)保合同的相對人審查義務(wù)[J];法學(xué);2013年03期

6 羅培新;;公司擔(dān)保法律規(guī)則的價值沖突與司法考量[J];中外法學(xué);2012年06期

7 劉貴祥;;公司擔(dān)保與合同效力[J];法律適用;2012年07期

8 朱廣新;;法定代表人的越權(quán)代表行為[J];中外法學(xué);2012年03期

9 劉炎;;公司對外一般擔(dān)保的效力認(rèn)定[J];金融法苑;2011年02期

10 錢玉林;;公司法第16條的規(guī)范意義[J];法學(xué)研究;2011年06期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 ;違反公司法第十六條不當(dāng)然導(dǎo)致合同無效[N];人民法院報;2008年

2 甘培忠;;公司法第十六條的法義情景解析[N];法制日報;2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 謝遵振;公司對外擔(dān)保的法律效力研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

2 曾拓;公司對外擔(dān)保的效力研究[D];中南大學(xué);2014年

3 白璐;公司擔(dān)保的效力認(rèn)定問題研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號：1433427