本文關(guān)鍵詞：設(shè)立中的法人制度的功能及缺陷——兼評《民法總則》第75條　出處：《法學(xué)雜志》2017年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 設(shè)立中的法人 必要行為 責(zé)任歸屬

【摘要】：德國的設(shè)立中的法人(公司)理論,本為以公司關(guān)系處理設(shè)立中的公司內(nèi)部問題,并將以設(shè)立公司為目的的必要行為,自然歸屬于成立后的法人。日本與我國臺灣地區(qū)的設(shè)立中的公司理論及實踐則是將設(shè)立中的公司與成立后的公司視為同一體來,以設(shè)立公司為必要目的的行為自然歸屬于成立后的公司。由于設(shè)立中的公司理論的不成熟及其與有關(guān)基本法律制度和理論的相悖,各國主要通過司法判例個案化來解決有關(guān)問題�！蹲罡呷嗣穹ㄔ宏P(guān)于適用中華人民共和國公司法若干問題的規(guī)定(三)》將設(shè)立中的公司所有行為都必然歸屬于成立后的公司是不負(fù)責(zé)任的。我國民法總則所規(guī)定的設(shè)立中的法人制度是值得反思的。
[Abstract]:The establishment of the German Corporation (the company) theory, the establishment of the company internal problems in dealing with the relationship between the company, and to set up the company as necessary to the legal nature, belong to after the establishment of the company. The theory and practice of the establishment of Japan and China in the Taiwan region is in the establishment of the company and after the establishment of the company as one, to set up a company for the purpose of the act is attributable to the necessary natural after the establishment of the company. Since the establishment of a company contrary theory is not mature and the basic legal system and the theory of regulation in other countries, mainly through judicial precedent case to solve the problem. The Supreme People's court several issues concerning the application of company law of People's Republic of China (three) > the company setting up all the activities necessary attributable to after the establishment of the company is not responsible. The provisions of China's civil law. The legal person system in erect is worth rethinking.

【作者單位】： 河南財經(jīng)政法大學(xué);
【分類號】：D922.291.91;D923.1
【正文快照】： 一、問題的提出 無疑,剛剛通過的《中華人民共和國民法總則》(以下簡稱《民法總則》),是我國理論界與實踐界對中國幾十年來行之有效的民商事理論、立法與司法的結(jié)晶。整體而言,其內(nèi)容、結(jié)構(gòu)都比較科學(xué)、合理,而且比較符合中國國情。但其中設(shè)置的一些制度,特別是與商事有關(guān)的，

本文編號：1426010