本文關(guān)鍵詞：經(jīng)濟(jì)法的司法空白之彌補(bǔ)　出處：《法學(xué)論壇》2017年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 經(jīng)濟(jì)法 經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展公平 經(jīng)濟(jì)訴訟法

【摘要】：由于經(jīng)濟(jì)法的立法尚未真正確認(rèn)與設(shè)立經(jīng)濟(jì)法主體特有的權(quán)利,經(jīng)濟(jì)法的司法尚無法真正保護(hù)經(jīng)濟(jì)法主體的權(quán)利。當(dāng)前,有些本屬于經(jīng)濟(jì)法上的案件,卻分別按照從屬于民事和行政的司法問題作了處理。這使經(jīng)濟(jì)法出現(xiàn)了司法空白,已經(jīng)非常不適應(yīng)保障經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展公平之需要。必須從經(jīng)濟(jì)法的立法上科學(xué)確認(rèn)、設(shè)定和保護(hù)當(dāng)事人的權(quán)利(勞動(dòng)力權(quán)),并制定相應(yīng)的訴訟與非訴訟程序法,使經(jīng)濟(jì)法主體的權(quán)利同樣能得到司法保護(hù)。彌補(bǔ)經(jīng)濟(jì)法的司法空白必定能有力地保障勞動(dòng)者、投資者、政府的合作共贏,促進(jìn)我國經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)的可持續(xù)健康的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Because the legislation of economic law has not really confirmed and established the special rights of the subject of economic law, the judicature of economic law has not been able to protect the rights of the subject of economic law. At present, some cases belong to economic law. But according to the subordinate to the civil and administrative judicial issues are dealt with. This makes the economic law judicial gaps, has been very inadequate to protect the needs of economic development equity. Must be scientifically confirmed from the legislation of economic law. Create and protect the rights of the parties (labor rights) and formulate corresponding procedural and non-procedural laws. So that the rights of the subject of economic law can also get judicial protection. To make up for the judicial gaps in economic law must be able to protect the cooperation of workers, investors, and the government. To promote the sustainable and healthy development of China's economy and society.
【作者單位】： 湘潭大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D922.29
【正文快照】： 如果承認(rèn)經(jīng)濟(jì)法是個(gè)獨(dú)立的重要的法律部門,那么與之對(duì)應(yīng)的我國經(jīng)濟(jì)法司法便處于空白狀態(tài)。出于處理經(jīng)濟(jì)糾紛案件的需要,1979年9月,最高人民法院設(shè)立經(jīng)濟(jì)審判庭,負(fù)責(zé)審理經(jīng)濟(jì)糾紛案件。也許是因?yàn)榻?jīng)濟(jì)糾紛案件(一是經(jīng)濟(jì)合同糾紛,如買賣合同糾紛、借款合同糾紛、承攬合同糾紛、

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 廖建求,田開友;經(jīng)濟(jì)法運(yùn)行的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[J];湘潭工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

2 趙蕾蕾;經(jīng)濟(jì)法主體范疇之探析[J];社科縱橫;2004年04期

3 呂志祥,辛萬鵬;再論經(jīng)濟(jì)法的基本原則[J];理論月刊;2004年05期

4 盧澤芳,王安潔;論經(jīng)濟(jì)法的主體——對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)法主體研究的回顧和反思[J];南華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年02期

5 王海東,盧國聰;經(jīng)濟(jì)法責(zé)任初探[J];河南商業(yè)高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

6 張e，

本文編號(hào)：1425160