【摘要】：環(huán)境犯罪作為一種新型的犯罪,較之傳統(tǒng)的犯罪類型認定面臨著一些科技難題,其中最突出的是環(huán)境犯罪中因果關(guān)系判斷的困難。目前世界各國的主流做法是將疫學(xué)因果關(guān)系原則應(yīng)用于環(huán)境犯罪認定過程中,通過專家證據(jù)來證明環(huán)境污染犯罪的成立與否。因而,專家證據(jù)的采信常常是定案的關(guān)鍵所在。然而,由于復(fù)雜系統(tǒng)的科學(xué)模糊性特征,專家證據(jù)需要與公眾意見相溝通,并通過一些證據(jù)規(guī)則對其進行規(guī)制,只有這樣才能排除公眾的合理懷疑并達到法官內(nèi)心確信。
[Abstract]:As a new type of crime, environmental crime faces some difficult problems in science and technology compared with traditional crime types, among which the most prominent is the difficulty of judging causality in environmental crime. At present, the main practice in the world is to apply the causation principle of epidemic science to the identification of environmental crime, and to prove whether the crime of environmental pollution is established or not by expert evidence. Therefore, the acceptance of expert evidence is often the key to the final case. However, due to the scientific fuzziness of the complex system, expert evidence needs to communicate with the public opinion and regulate it through some rules of evidence. Only in this way can the reasonable suspicion of the public be eliminated and the judge's inner belief can be reached.
【作者單位】： 桂林電子科技大學(xué)法學(xué)院;重慶大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金項目(11XFX002)
【分類號】：D922.68;D924

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 劉超;林亞真;;環(huán)境侵權(quán)訴訟中損害認定的困境與爭議[J];湖北行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年02期

，

本文編號：2453708