【摘要】： 本書(shū)根據(jù)安徽省績(jī)溪縣善莊鎮(zhèn)擇塘村近八個(gè)月的“林權(quán)”田野調(diào)查所完成。 本書(shū)的研究主題屬于“林權(quán)”范疇。但問(wèn)題的核心不是“林權(quán)”的語(yǔ)義分析,也不是“林權(quán)”的法理建構(gòu),而是開(kāi)展“林權(quán)”之于中國(guó)經(jīng)驗(yàn)的歷史實(shí)踐研究。 本書(shū)采用“整體生存?zhèn)惱怼弊鳛檠芯坎呗?努力把“國(guó)家視角”和“民間視角”結(jié)合起來(lái),通過(guò)“在場(chǎng)式”田野工作,以“事件束”為切入點(diǎn),把“林權(quán)”置于宗族、村落、信仰、法律、村治、市場(chǎng)、水利等整體歷史—文化緯度,積極挖掘“在地范疇”,全面審視徽州文化場(chǎng)境下“林權(quán)”實(shí)踐及其再生產(chǎn)。調(diào)查結(jié)果表明,“林權(quán)”的國(guó)家法“表達(dá)”和民間法“實(shí)踐”的發(fā)生背離,這既是“整體生存?zhèn)惱怼笨疾斓谋尘?也是“整體生存?zhèn)惱怼睂?shí)踐的結(jié)果。當(dāng)然,本書(shū)研究宗旨不在于揭示“表達(dá)”和“實(shí)踐”的二元化,而在于考察“整體生存?zhèn)惱怼眻?chǎng)境下林權(quán)實(shí)踐“法律內(nèi)卷化”,即由于國(guó)家法的規(guī)則理性與民間法的秩序邏輯之間的文化區(qū)隔,造成有法律而少秩序的制度性事實(shí)。其具體表現(xiàn)為：催生山林獨(dú)聯(lián)體,激發(fā)林權(quán)糾紛、引起械斗上訪、灰色勢(shì)力鑲嵌村莊、林權(quán)集中少數(shù)能人、沖擊村莊治理、影響法律權(quán)威、惡化生態(tài)環(huán)境等等。 本書(shū)嘗試著呈現(xiàn)“林權(quán)”研究新發(fā)現(xiàn)：其一,林權(quán)證還是一種形式性財(cái)產(chǎn),充其量只是林權(quán)的“象征資本”；其二,“山林獨(dú)聯(lián)體”無(wú)法實(shí)現(xiàn)西方產(chǎn)權(quán)形態(tài),反倒造成林業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)遲緩和生態(tài)效益下降；其三,外來(lái)資本“鑲嵌”村族共同體,正在沖擊農(nóng)村治理及其穩(wěn)定：其四,中國(guó)“身份性”林權(quán)尚未(甚至難以)讓渡于“契約性”林權(quán),“祖山”仍是農(nóng)民“道義經(jīng)濟(jì)”的生存依賴；其五,“整體生存?zhèn)惱怼眻?chǎng)境下“林權(quán)”實(shí)踐還會(huì)導(dǎo)致“鄰接性”權(quán)利(例如水權(quán)、礦權(quán))的再生產(chǎn)。其六,“法律內(nèi)卷化”是轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期國(guó)家法與民間法“嵌合”實(shí)踐的結(jié)果,也將有效推進(jìn)中國(guó)“回應(yīng)型”法治建設(shè)。
[Abstract]:This book according to Jixi County, Shanzhuang Town, Xuetang Village, nearly eight months of "Forest right" field survey completed. The subject of this book belongs to the category of forest rights. But the core of the problem is not the semantic analysis of "forest right" nor the legal construction of "forest right", but the historical practice study of "forest right" in Chinese experience. This book adopts "the whole survival ethics" as the research strategy, diligently unifies "the national angle of view" and "the folk angle of view", through "the presence type" the field work, takes "the incident bundle" as the breakthrough point, puts "the forest right" in the clan, the village, Faith, law, village government, market, water conservancy, etc., such as the whole historical and cultural latitude, actively excavate "in the category of land", comprehensively examine the practice and reproduction of "forest right" in Huizhou cultural field. The result shows that the deviation between the expression of "forest right" and the "practice" of folk law is not only the background of "whole survival ethics", but also the result of "whole survival ethics" practice. Of course, the purpose of this book is not to reveal the dualism of "expression" and "practice", but to examine the practice of forest rights in the context of "holistic survival ethics". That is, due to the cultural division between the rule rationality of the state law and the order logic of the folk law, the institutional fact that there is law but little order is created. Its concrete manifestation is: to give birth to the mountain forest CIS, to stimulate the forest right dispute, to cause the armed fight to petition, the gray force to inlay the village, the forest right to concentrate a few talented people, to impact the village governance, to influence the legal authority, to worsen the ecological environment and so on. This book attempts to present new findings in the study of "forest rights": first, forest tenure certificates are still formal property, at best they are "symbolic capital" of forest rights; second, "mountain forest CIS" cannot realize the western property right form. On the contrary, the forestry economy is sluggish and the ecological efficiency is declining. Third, the external capital "inlay" the village community is impacting the rural governance and its stability: fourth, China's "identity" forest rights have not yet been (or even difficult to) transfer to the "contractual" forest rights, "Zushan" is still farmers'"moral economy" survival dependence. The practice of "forest right" under the environment of "whole survival ethics" will also lead to the reproduction of "adjacent" rights (such as water rights and mining rights). Sixthly, the "law in volume" is the result of the practice of "chimera" between the state law and the folk law in the transitional period, and it will also effectively promote the construction of the "responsive" rule of law in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D922.63;F326.2

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王永紅;;我國(guó)林權(quán)改革視閾下林權(quán)的界定論[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

2 林輝煌;;林權(quán)制度的法律實(shí)踐與地方建構(gòu)——基于粵北高村的調(diào)查[J];民間法;2012年00期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 李麗媛;稅收對(duì)林業(yè)上市企業(yè)資本結(jié)構(gòu)的影響研究[D];東北林業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

2 祝偉友;九三管理局生態(tài)林業(yè)建設(shè)現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展對(duì)策研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年

3 孫文芳;集體林權(quán)制度改革中的利益相關(guān)者分析[D];華中師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2144334