【摘要】：立法目的是指國(guó)家在制定或認(rèn)可法律時(shí)希望達(dá)到的目的或希望實(shí)現(xiàn)的結(jié)果。立法目的決定立法的指導(dǎo)思想和法律的調(diào)整對(duì)象，屬于法基本問(wèn)題的范疇。明確法的目的，有利于我們正確理解立法意圖、正確理解和執(zhí)行法律。本文通過(guò)對(duì)環(huán)境應(yīng)急立法目的的研究，旨在厘清各種基本概念的基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)現(xiàn)行應(yīng)急法律及相關(guān)文件予以檢討，從而提出更為科學(xué)合理的環(huán)境應(yīng)急立法目的，為環(huán)境應(yīng)急單行法的制定提供理論支持。 本論文分為四個(gè)部分。第一部分是環(huán)境應(yīng)急立法目的概述，對(duì)突發(fā)事件、突發(fā)環(huán)境事件以及突發(fā)環(huán)境事件應(yīng)急三者的概念予以明晰，層層遞進(jìn)，在參考前人的基礎(chǔ)上提出本文的看法。在這一部分對(duì)立法目的也作了一簡(jiǎn)要介紹。 第二部分是對(duì)現(xiàn)行環(huán)境應(yīng)急立法的探討。討論了《突發(fā)事件應(yīng)對(duì)法》在規(guī)制環(huán)境應(yīng)急方面的局限性以及立法的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)，為環(huán)境應(yīng)急立法目的的確定打下基礎(chǔ)；對(duì)《國(guó)家突發(fā)環(huán)境事件應(yīng)急預(yù)案》的性質(zhì)與效力進(jìn)行了分析，，認(rèn)為其不屬于法律法規(guī)，不具有嚴(yán)格的法律效力，但也吸收了該預(yù)案在理論和實(shí)務(wù)上的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)，對(duì)我們環(huán)境應(yīng)急立法目的的確立具有重要的參考價(jià)值。 第三部分，探討了制定環(huán)境應(yīng)急單行法的必要性。在對(duì)學(xué)界觀點(diǎn)揚(yáng)棄的基礎(chǔ)上，指出環(huán)境應(yīng)急單行法不僅是環(huán)境應(yīng)急法制體系建設(shè)的要求，同時(shí)也是環(huán)境應(yīng)急實(shí)踐的要求。 第四部分是本文的重點(diǎn)，也是主要?jiǎng)?chuàng)新之所在。提出環(huán)境應(yīng)急立法目的在于突出預(yù)防、保障安全和維護(hù)秩序，對(duì)預(yù)防、安全和秩序進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)探討，并在形式上提出了環(huán)境應(yīng)急立法目的。
[Abstract]:The purpose of the legislation is to refer to the purpose of the state in making or recognizing the law. The purpose of the legislation is to determine the guiding ideology and the object of the law, which belongs to the category of the basic legal issues. The purpose of the clear law is beneficial to our understanding of the legislative intent and the correct understanding and enforcement of the law. This article passes through the ring. The purpose of environmental emergency legislation is to make a review of the current emergency laws and related documents on the basis of clarifying the basic concepts, so as to provide a more scientific and rational environmental emergency legislative purpose and to provide theoretical support for the formulation of environmental emergency single line law.
This paper is divided into four parts. The first part is an overview of environmental emergency legislative purposes. The concept of emergency, sudden environmental events and emergency environmental emergencies of the three are clear and progressive, and the views of this article are put forward on the basis of the predecessors. In this part, the purpose of the legislation is also briefly introduced.
The second part is the discussion of the current environmental emergency legislation. The limitations of the emergency response law and the successful experience of the legislation are discussed, and the basis for the determination of environmental emergency legislative purposes is laid. The nature and effectiveness of the emergency plan for environmental emergencies in the state are analyzed, and it is considered that it does not belong to the law. Laws and regulations do not have strict legal effect, but they also absorb the successful experience of the plan in theory and practice, and have important reference value for the establishment of our environmental emergency legislative purpose.
In the third part, the necessity of establishing an environmental emergency single line method is discussed. On the basis of the discarding of the academic views, it is pointed out that the environmental emergency single line method is not only the requirement of the construction of environmental emergency system, but also the requirement of environmental emergency practice.
The fourth part is the focus of this article and also the main innovation. The aim of environmental emergency legislation is to highlight prevention, safeguard safety and maintain order, discuss the prevention, safety and order in detail, and put forward the legislative purpose of environmental emergency in form.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D922.14;D922.68

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 嚴(yán)利;;環(huán)境突發(fā)事件的應(yīng)急法制體系研究[J];安全;2007年08期

2 王靖喻;;中國(guó)生態(tài)安全的法制化思考[J];環(huán)境科學(xué)與管理;2008年07期

3 唐仙麗;楊宇靜;;論中國(guó)突發(fā)性環(huán)境污染事故應(yīng)急立法的完善[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年06期

4 趙驚濤;生態(tài)安全與法律秩序[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2004年03期

5 林鴻潮;;論應(yīng)急預(yù)案的性質(zhì)和效力——以國(guó)家和省級(jí)預(yù)案為考察對(duì)象[J];法學(xué)家;2009年02期

6 王樹(shù)義;;生態(tài)安全及其立法問(wèn)題探討[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2006年03期

7 戚建剛;楊小敏;;“松花江水污染”事件凸顯我國(guó)環(huán)境應(yīng)急機(jī)制的六大弊端[J];法學(xué);2006年01期

8 廖建凱,黃瓊;對(duì)突發(fā)環(huán)境事件應(yīng)急立法的思考[J];工業(yè)安全與環(huán)保;2005年11期

9 蔡守秋;;修改《環(huán)境保護(hù)法》為《環(huán)境法》的基本構(gòu)想[J];貴州社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年05期

10 汪勁;論現(xiàn)代西方環(huán)境權(quán)益理論中的若干新理念[J];中外法學(xué);1999年04期

本文編號(hào)：2121208