本文選題：建設(shè)項(xiàng)目 + 環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)��； 參考：《蘇州大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：建設(shè)項(xiàng)目環(huán)評(píng)報(bào)告書的審批是環(huán)保部門一項(xiàng)重要的行政許可權(quán),諸多案例表明,聽證制度的引入能夠促進(jìn)該權(quán)力的合法合理地行使,有助于將公眾的環(huán)境權(quán)利、政府的行政權(quán)力、社會(huì)的環(huán)境權(quán)益相統(tǒng)一。本文從《環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)法》、《環(huán)境保護(hù)行政許可聽證暫行辦法》、《環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)公眾參與暫行辦法》等現(xiàn)行規(guī)定分析入手,以“圓明園環(huán)評(píng)聽證案”、“北京西-上-六環(huán)評(píng)聽證案”等案件為現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ),對(duì)我國建設(shè)項(xiàng)目環(huán)評(píng)報(bào)告書審批中的聽證制度進(jìn)行研究。 文章首先從聽證的概念入手,闡述了建設(shè)項(xiàng)目環(huán)評(píng)報(bào)告書審批中的聽證概念,特點(diǎn)及其意義,為之后的論述鋪墊了必要的理論基礎(chǔ)。然后,按照聽證的時(shí)間順序,分別論述了建設(shè)項(xiàng)目環(huán)評(píng)報(bào)告書審批聽證前的準(zhǔn)備機(jī)制、聽證中的進(jìn)行機(jī)制與聽證后的回應(yīng)機(jī)制。聽證前準(zhǔn)備機(jī)制的構(gòu)建分別從聽證的啟動(dòng)、聽證代表的選擇、聽證主持人的選任等三個(gè)角度,評(píng)析現(xiàn)實(shí)案例,分析現(xiàn)有法律規(guī)定不足,探索了聽證強(qiáng)制啟動(dòng)機(jī)制的建立,聽證代表人選擇與聽證主持人選任的原則與程序的完善。聽證中進(jìn)行機(jī)制的構(gòu)建主要著眼于聽證議題、質(zhì)辯程序與聽證坐席布局三個(gè)重點(diǎn)環(huán)節(jié)。提出了要借助于預(yù)備聽證會(huì)、書面證言規(guī)則等確定出聽證的關(guān)鍵議題,借鑒法庭審判程序完善聽證的質(zhì)證制度和辯論制度,以程序正義的觀念建立起合理的聽證會(huì)坐席布局。在聽證后回應(yīng)機(jī)制的構(gòu)建上,要以案卷排他性為原則,明確聽證筆錄在作出行政許可決定時(shí)的法律效力,同時(shí),要在許可機(jī)關(guān)、申請(qǐng)人、利害關(guān)系人發(fā)現(xiàn)新證據(jù)的情況下,建立再聽證制度,要在聽證程序違法的情況下,建立救濟(jì)的途徑與方法。
[Abstract]:The examination and approval of the EIA report of construction projects is an important administrative license right of the environmental protection department. Many cases show that the introduction of the hearing system can promote the lawful and reasonable exercise of this power and help to bring the environmental rights of the public into practice. The administrative power of the government and the environmental rights and interests of the society are unified. This paper begins with the analysis of the current regulations, such as the Environmental impact Assessment Law, the interim measures for the hearing of Environmental Protection Administrative Licensing, and the interim measures for Public participation in Environmental impact Assessment, and takes the "Old Summer Palace Environmental impact Assessment hearing case" as a starting point. The hearing system in the examination and approval of environmental impact assessment report of construction projects in China is studied on the basis of the case of "Beijing West-Shang-6 EIA hearing case" and other cases. This paper begins with the concept of hearing, expounds the concept, characteristics and significance of hearing in the examination and approval of construction project environmental assessment report, which lays the necessary theoretical foundation for the later discussion. Then, according to the time order of the hearing, the paper discusses the preparation mechanism before the hearing, the mechanism of carrying out the hearing and the response mechanism after the hearing. The construction of pre-hearing preparation mechanism from the three angles of hearing initiation, hearing representative selection, hearing moderator selection and appointment, analyzes the actual cases, analyzes the insufficiency of the existing legal provisions, and explores the establishment of the hearing compulsory start mechanism. The selection of hearing representative and the perfection of the principle and procedure of the selection and appointment of the hearing moderator. The construction of the mechanism in the hearing mainly focuses on the issues of the hearing, the quality of the debate procedure and the layout of the hearing seat. The paper puts forward that the key issues of the hearing should be determined by means of the preparatory hearing and written testimony rules, the cross-examination system and the debate system of the hearing should be perfected by the trial procedure of the court, and a reasonable seat layout of the hearing should be established with the concept of procedural justice. In the construction of the response mechanism after the hearing, the principle of exclusiveness of the case file should be taken to make clear the legal effect of the record of the hearing in making the administrative license decision. At the same time, when the licensing authority, the applicant, the interested person discover the new evidence, To establish the system of re-hearing, we should establish the way and method of relief under the circumstance of illegal hearing procedure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1;D922.68

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 袁文峰;;圓明園整治工程環(huán)境影響評(píng)估中的公眾參與形式探析[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年06期

2 竺效;環(huán)境行政許可聽證庭座席布局的法理探究 以“北京西上六電磁輻射聽證案”和“圓明園環(huán)評(píng)聽證案”為例[J];法律適用;2005年08期

3 竺效;論環(huán)境行政許可聽證利害關(guān)系人代表的選擇機(jī)制[J];法商研究;2005年05期

4 竺效;環(huán)境行政許可聽證專家主持人制度初探——兼議《環(huán)境保護(hù)行政許可聽證暫行辦法》第8條的完善[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2005年05期

5 朱謙;;抗?fàn)幹械沫h(huán)境信息應(yīng)該及時(shí)公開——評(píng)廈門PX項(xiàng)目與城市總體規(guī)劃環(huán)評(píng)[J];法學(xué);2008年01期

6 朱謙;;環(huán)境公共決策中個(gè)體參與之缺陷及其克服——以近年來環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)公眾參與個(gè)案為參照[J];法學(xué);2009年02期

7 楊海坤,劉洋林;關(guān)于行政聽證制度的討論[J];江蘇公安�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2000年02期

8 周珂,王小龍;環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)制度中的公眾參與[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

9 竺效;圓明園湖底防滲工程公眾聽證會(huì)的法律性質(zhì)研究[J];河北法學(xué);2005年08期

10 ;環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)聽證程序?qū)嵭詥栴}研究[J];河北師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1978167