本文選題：環(huán)境民事糾紛 + 行政處理　； 參考：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 本文從實(shí)證角度出發(fā),對(duì)中國(guó)政法大學(xué)污染受害者法律幫助中心進(jìn)行調(diào)研并取得了相關(guān)資料,并對(duì)調(diào)研資料進(jìn)行定性和定量分析,力圖從中探究我國(guó)環(huán)境民事糾紛行政處理制度的真實(shí)現(xiàn)狀。通過(guò)對(duì)調(diào)研取得的典型案例和統(tǒng)計(jì)數(shù)字的分析表明,出現(xiàn)環(huán)境民事糾紛后當(dāng)事人一般都傾向于尋求行政機(jī)關(guān)予以解決,說(shuō)明環(huán)境民事糾紛行政處理機(jī)制易于為我國(guó)民眾接受。然而,調(diào)研數(shù)據(jù)同時(shí)顯示,多數(shù)環(huán)境民事糾紛的行政處理結(jié)果卻不能令人滿意。 環(huán)境民事糾紛與其它傳統(tǒng)糾紛類型相比具有一定的特殊性,如雙方當(dāng)事人地位不平等、科技性強(qiáng)以及糾紛形成原因復(fù)雜等;而行政處理制度本身具有專業(yè)性、程序簡(jiǎn)單靈活和經(jīng)濟(jì)性等特點(diǎn),這決定了其較其它糾紛解決方式更適于解決環(huán)境民事糾紛。對(duì)于影響我國(guó)環(huán)境民事糾紛行政處理制度未能發(fā)揮應(yīng)有效用的原因,筆者進(jìn)行了分析,認(rèn)為:行政處理方式單一、污染證據(jù)收集困難、當(dāng)事人力量懸殊、環(huán)保機(jī)構(gòu)的公信力等是影響當(dāng)事人自愿選擇行政處理方式解決環(huán)境民事糾紛的原因,同時(shí),影響當(dāng)事人對(duì)糾紛處理結(jié)果信服的因素主要有糾紛處理機(jī)構(gòu)的獨(dú)立性地位、糾紛處理機(jī)構(gòu)組成人員的專業(yè)性以及糾紛處理結(jié)果的法律效力問(wèn)題。另外,高效、快捷的解決程序也是影響我國(guó)環(huán)境民事糾紛行政處理制度實(shí)施的重要因素。在對(duì)上述影響性因素進(jìn)行論述過(guò)程中,本文結(jié)合了日本、韓國(guó)及我國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū)的相關(guān)經(jīng)驗(yàn)進(jìn)行分析。 在從實(shí)踐和理論兩方面分析我國(guó)環(huán)境民事糾紛行政處理制度的現(xiàn)狀和影響性因素的基礎(chǔ)上,筆者對(duì)其完善提出以下建議:首先,制定我國(guó)環(huán)境民事糾紛處理制度專有法律或法規(guī),明確整個(gè)機(jī)制的實(shí)體內(nèi)容和運(yùn)行程序,對(duì)環(huán)境糾紛行政處理制度的有效實(shí)施提供法律保障;其次,設(shè)立專門的環(huán)境民事糾紛行政處理機(jī)構(gòu),保證處理機(jī)構(gòu)的獨(dú)立性和中立性,以此達(dá)到處理結(jié)果的公正和權(quán)威;第三,環(huán)境民事糾紛行政處理制度與其它相關(guān)制度聯(lián)系密切,還應(yīng)該完善信訪制度、公眾參與制度、信息公開(kāi)制度以及加重環(huán)境違法責(zé)任等相關(guān)配套制度,進(jìn)一步為行政處理制度在解決環(huán)境民事糾紛中發(fā)揮應(yīng)有作用提供保證。
[Abstract]:From the empirical point of view, this paper investigates the Center for legal Assistance of pollution victims of China University of political Science and Law, and obtains relevant data, and carries out qualitative and quantitative analysis of the data. This paper tries to explore the real situation of the administrative handling system of environmental civil disputes in China. Through the analysis of typical cases and statistics obtained by investigation and research, it is shown that the parties tend to seek solutions from administrative organs after the emergence of environmental civil disputes, indicating that the administrative handling mechanism of environmental civil disputes is easy to be accepted by the people in our country. However, the survey data also show that the administrative results of most environmental civil disputes are unsatisfactory. Compared with other traditional dispute types, environmental civil disputes have some particularities, such as the unequal status of both parties, strong science and technology, and complex causes of disputes, while the administrative handling system itself is professional. The advantages of simple and flexible procedure and economy determine that it is more suitable for solving environmental civil disputes than other dispute resolution methods. The author analyzes the reasons why the administrative treatment system of environmental civil disputes in China fails to play its due role. The author thinks that the administrative treatment method is single, the collection of pollution evidence is difficult, and the power of the parties is far from equal. The credibility of environmental protection agencies is the reason that affects the parties to choose the administrative way to solve the environmental civil disputes voluntarily. At the same time, the main factors that affect the parties' conviction to the outcome of dispute resolution are the independent status of the dispute handling institutions. The professional nature of the members of the dispute handling organization and the legal effect of the dispute settlement result. In addition, efficient and quick settlement procedure is also an important factor that affects the implementation of administrative handling system of environmental civil disputes in China. In the process of discussing the above influential factors, this paper analyzes the relevant experiences of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. On the basis of analyzing the present situation and influencing factors of administrative handling system of environmental civil disputes in China from the aspects of practice and theory, the author puts forward the following suggestions for its perfection: first, Make the special laws or regulations of environmental civil dispute handling system in our country, clarify the substantive content and operation procedure of the whole mechanism, and provide legal guarantee for the effective implementation of the administrative handling system of environmental dispute; secondly, Establish a special administrative agency for handling environmental civil disputes to ensure the independence and neutrality of the handling institutions, so as to achieve justice and authority of the outcome; third, the administrative handling system of environmental civil disputes is closely related to other relevant systems, We should also improve the system of letters and visits, the system of public participation, the system of information disclosure and the related supporting systems, such as aggravating the responsibility for environmental violations, and further provide guarantees for the administrative handling system to play its due role in the settlement of environmental civil disputes.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D922.6

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 蘇雪莉;我國(guó)環(huán)境民事糾紛行政處理機(jī)制與訴訟機(jī)制的關(guān)系研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2010年

2 劉文娟;論我國(guó)環(huán)境糾紛行政處理機(jī)制的完善[D];山東師范大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1920313