本文選題：野生動(dòng)物資源 + 野生動(dòng)物資源物權(quán)��； 參考：《昆明理工大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：野生動(dòng)物資源既是人類寶貴的自然財(cái)富,也是人類生存環(huán)境中不可或缺的重要組成部分。社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)條件下,若要實(shí)現(xiàn)可持續(xù)發(fā)展,對(duì)野生動(dòng)物保護(hù)事業(yè)而言,僅僅有以野生動(dòng)物資源行政管理為主導(dǎo)的政府“管理之法”是遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不夠的,因?yàn)橐吧鷦?dòng)物資源的保護(hù)和利用需要政府和市場(chǎng)功能的整合和互補(bǔ)。而作為社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)基本法的物權(quán)法,面對(duì)要解決野生動(dòng)物資源保護(hù)和利用的問題則責(zé)無旁貸。 本文分為五個(gè)部分。 第一部分“野生動(dòng)物資源物權(quán)之基本原理”,著重闡述了野生動(dòng)物的概念、野生動(dòng)物資源的概念和野生動(dòng)物資源物權(quán)的概念及其法律屬性和法律構(gòu)造。首先闡述野生動(dòng)物的概念和作為“特殊物”的法律地位,其次闡述野生動(dòng)物資源的概念和特征,以與野生動(dòng)物相區(qū)別,再次闡述了野生動(dòng)物資源的“物”之屬性,此乃本部分的重點(diǎn),并提出修正傳統(tǒng)“物之特定性”理論的觀點(diǎn)。最后分析了野生動(dòng)物資源物權(quán)的本質(zhì)和法律構(gòu)造。 第二部分“我國(guó)野生動(dòng)物資源物權(quán)制度之檢討”,運(yùn)用實(shí)證主義的方法檢討我國(guó)現(xiàn)行野生動(dòng)物資源物權(quán)制度,包括野生動(dòng)物資源的法律地位、野生動(dòng)物資源所有權(quán)制度和野生動(dòng)物資源占用權(quán)制度,并從“整體論”、“系統(tǒng)論”和“生態(tài)化”的視角對(duì)其進(jìn)行評(píng)析,探尋有待重構(gòu)之處。 第三部分“國(guó)外、境外關(guān)于野生動(dòng)物資源物權(quán)立法的比較與借鑒”,主要從野生動(dòng)物資源的保護(hù)范圍、野生動(dòng)物資源的法律地位、野生動(dòng)物資源所有權(quán)和野生動(dòng)物資源占用權(quán)等方面對(duì)美國(guó)、俄羅斯、德國(guó)、日本、荷蘭、奧地利、瑞士、澳大利亞、羅馬尼亞、蒙古、匈牙利、泰國(guó)、魁北克、臺(tái)灣以及澳門等國(guó)家和地區(qū)的民事立法和環(huán)境立法進(jìn)行歸納和比較,重點(diǎn)探討對(duì)我國(guó)野生動(dòng)物資源物權(quán)制度完善的可資借鑒之處。 第四部分“我國(guó)野生動(dòng)物資源物權(quán)制度之重構(gòu)”,筆者擬從立法理念之生態(tài)化、傳統(tǒng)物權(quán)理論之變革、立法技術(shù)之完善、野生動(dòng)物資源所有權(quán)以及野生動(dòng)物資源占用權(quán)之建立等方面對(duì)我國(guó)野生動(dòng)物資源物權(quán)制度進(jìn)行重構(gòu)。首先,闡述了物權(quán)理念之生態(tài)化的內(nèi)容包括尊重生態(tài)價(jià)值、平衡環(huán)境利益、堅(jiān)持可持續(xù)發(fā)展,并分析了實(shí)現(xiàn)生態(tài)化物權(quán)理念應(yīng)當(dāng)選擇的路徑。其次,在生態(tài)化的物權(quán)理念之下,建議變革傳統(tǒng)物權(quán)理論,以物權(quán)二元結(jié)構(gòu)論為理論基礎(chǔ),創(chuàng)建野生動(dòng)物資源占用權(quán)。接著,在立法技術(shù)方面,建議賦予野生動(dòng)物資源“特殊物”的法律地位和明確界定并擴(kuò)大野生動(dòng)物資源的物權(quán)保護(hù)范圍。再次,對(duì)我國(guó)野生動(dòng)物資源所有權(quán)制度在體系、取得方式、行使及其限制等方面進(jìn)行重構(gòu)。最后,創(chuàng)造性地建立我國(guó)野生動(dòng)物資源占用權(quán)制度,詳盡地論述了野生動(dòng)物資源占用權(quán)的主體、客體、內(nèi)容、取得和轉(zhuǎn)讓以及消滅等內(nèi)容。
[Abstract]:Wildlife resources are not only the precious natural wealth of human beings, but also an indispensable part of human living environment. Under the condition of socialist market economy, if we want to realize the sustainable development, it is far from enough for wildlife protection to have only the government "law of management", which is dominated by the administration of wildlife resources. Because the protection and utilization of wildlife resources need the integration and complementation of government and market functions. As the basic law of socialist market economy, the property law is duty-bound to solve the problem of wildlife resources protection and utilization. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part, "the basic principle of the property right of wildlife resources", focuses on the concept of wildlife, the concept of wildlife resources, the concept of real right of wildlife resources and its legal attributes and legal structure. First, the concept of wildlife and its legal status as a "special object" are expounded. Secondly, the concept and characteristics of wildlife resources are expounded to distinguish them from those of wild animals, and then the attributes of "objects" of wildlife resources are expounded. This is the focus of this part, and the point of view of revising the traditional theory of "the specificity of things" is put forward. Finally, it analyzes the nature and legal structure of the real right of wildlife resources. The second part "the review of the real right system of wildlife resources in our country", using the positivism method to review the real right system of the wildlife resources in our country, including the legal status of the wild animal resources. The ownership system of wildlife resources and the system of occupying right of wildlife resources are analyzed from the perspectives of "holism", "system theory" and "ecology" to explore the place to be reconstructed. The third part, "comparison and reference of foreign legislation on wildlife resources property right", mainly from the scope of protection of wildlife resources, the legal status of wildlife resources, For the United States, Russia, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, Austria, Switzerland, Australia, Romania, Mongolia, Hungary, Thailand, Quebec, the United States, Russia, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, Austria, Switzerland, Australia, Romania, Mongolia, Hungary, Thailand, Quebec, The civil legislation and environmental legislation of Taiwan and Macao are summarized and compared, and the reference to the perfection of the real right system of wildlife resources in China is discussed. In the fourth part, "the reconstruction of the real right system of wildlife resources in China", the author intends to make the legislative idea ecologicalization, the change of the traditional real right theory and the perfection of the legislative technology. This paper reconstructs the real right system of wildlife resources in China from the aspects of the ownership of wildlife resources and the establishment of the right to occupy wildlife resources. First of all, the ecological content of the concept of real right includes respecting ecological value, balancing environmental interests, insisting on sustainable development, and analyzing the path that should be chosen to realize the idea of ecological real right. Secondly, under the idea of ecological real right, it is suggested that the traditional theory of real right should be changed, and the theory of dual structure of real right should be taken as the theoretical basis to establish the right to occupy wildlife resources. Then, in the aspect of legislative technology, it is suggested that the legal status of "special objects" of wildlife resources and the scope of real right protection of wildlife resources should be clearly defined and expanded. Thirdly, the ownership system of wildlife resources in China is reconstructed in the aspects of system, way of acquisition, exercise and restriction. Finally, the author creatively establishes the system of the right to occupy wildlife resources in China, and discusses in detail the subject, object, content, acquisition and transfer, and elimination of the right to occupy wildlife resources.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：昆明理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D923.2;D922.68

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐昕;論動(dòng)物法律主體資格的確立——人類中心主義法理念及其消解[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年01期

2 陳小君;我國(guó)他物權(quán)體系的構(gòu)建[J];法商研究;2002年05期

3 屈茂輝;用益權(quán)的源流及其在我國(guó)民法上的借鑒意義[J];法律科學(xué)-西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期

4 戴謀富;論我國(guó)自然資源物權(quán)體系的構(gòu)建[J];長(zhǎng)沙理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年03期

5 劉云生;民法典設(shè)立先占取得制度之必要性與可能性透視[J];河北法學(xué);2005年03期

6 王紫零;非人類存在物法律主體資格初探[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年05期

7 楊立新,朱呈義;動(dòng)物法律人格之否定——兼論動(dòng)物之法律“物格”[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年05期

8 蔡守秋;;從對(duì)《德國(guó)民法典》第90a條的理解展開環(huán)境資源法學(xué)與民法學(xué)的對(duì)話[J];南陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

9 曹明德,徐以祥;中國(guó)民法法典化與生態(tài)保護(hù)[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2003年04期

10 陳本寒,周平;動(dòng)物法律地位之探討——兼析我國(guó)民事立法對(duì)動(dòng)物的應(yīng)有定位[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2002年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 王明友;關(guān)于野生動(dòng)物馴養(yǎng)繁殖法律制度的研究[D];東北林業(yè)大學(xué);2002年

2 陳春艷;我國(guó)野生動(dòng)物馴養(yǎng)繁殖法律制度研究[D];中南林業(yè)科技大學(xué);2006年

3 洪賀;我國(guó)野生動(dòng)物產(chǎn)權(quán)法律制度研究[D];東北林業(yè)大學(xué);2006年

4 張?zhí)m蘭;中國(guó)野生動(dòng)物狩獵立法研究[D];東北林業(yè)大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1789453