本文選題：集體林權(quán) + 利益沖突　； 參考：《浙江農(nóng)林大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：集體林權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)過程中的利益分配關(guān)系到政府、農(nóng)民集體、林農(nóng)、生態(tài)受益者等多方主體的權(quán)、責(zé)、利統(tǒng)一問題,關(guān)系林農(nóng)和承包造林的集體和個(gè)人的生產(chǎn)積極性。只有處理好集體林權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)中各方利益關(guān)系,才能實(shí)現(xiàn)林權(quán)主體收益的最大化,才能優(yōu)化資源配置,才能促進(jìn)林業(yè)發(fā)展、林農(nóng)增收和林區(qū)和諧。集體林權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)實(shí)質(zhì)上是一個(gè)利益衡平問題,從利益沖突與衡平的視角來論述集體林權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)過程中相關(guān)方利益衡平機(jī)制構(gòu)建是一個(gè)較新的嘗試。法律的價(jià)值定位是追求公平、正義、秩序。研究集體林權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)中利益相關(guān)方的平衡機(jī)制構(gòu)建,實(shí)質(zhì)是為了讓林業(yè)發(fā)展成果多方“共享”,實(shí)現(xiàn)法律維護(hù)公平正義的初衷。文章以利益平衡理論為導(dǎo)向,應(yīng)用博弈論的研究方法,研究林權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)過程中利益受益者與損害者之間博弈行為,尋求林權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)利益的平衡點(diǎn)。通過分析集體林權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)過程中存在的政府與生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)者、農(nóng)民集體與林農(nóng)、流出方與流入方、生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)者和生態(tài)受益者主要的四類利益沖突及其具體表現(xiàn),進(jìn)而從法律層面、制度層面、執(zhí)行層面剖析利益沖突的根源,最后從法律層面提出健全法律法規(guī),明確集體林權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)的權(quán)屬以及發(fā)展靈活多樣的流轉(zhuǎn)方式;從制度層面提出搭建統(tǒng)一的集體林權(quán)交易平臺(tái),建立科學(xué)的森林資產(chǎn)評(píng)估體系,組建高水平的中介服務(wù)組織,建立財(cái)政激勵(lì)機(jī)制;從執(zhí)行層面提出政府執(zhí)法更公正,政府定位更明確等一系列利益衡平的構(gòu)建之策。以期促進(jìn)林業(yè)持續(xù)快速健康發(fā)展,實(shí)現(xiàn)社會(huì)和諧發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The distribution of benefits in the circulation of collective forest rights relates to the unity of rights, responsibilities and interests of the government, farmers' collectives, forest farmers, ecological beneficiaries and so on, as well as the collective and individual production enthusiasm of forest farmers and contracted afforestation.Only by properly dealing with the interests of all parties in the circulation of collective forest rights can we maximize the benefits of the main body of forest rights, optimize the allocation of resources, and promote the development of forestry, increase the income of forest farmers and harmony with forest areas.The circulation of collective forest rights is essentially a problem of balancing interests. It is a relatively new attempt to discuss the construction of interest balance mechanism of relevant parties in the process of collective forest rights transfer from the perspective of conflict of interest and balance of interests.The value orientation of law is to pursue fairness, justice and order.The purpose of studying the balance mechanism of stakeholders in collective forest right circulation is to make the forest development fruits "share" in many ways and to realize the original intention of legal maintenance of fairness and justice.Guided by the theory of balance of interests, this paper applies the research method of game theory to study the game behavior between the beneficiaries and the losers in the process of forest property right circulation, and to seek the balance point of the interests of forest property right circulation.Through the analysis of the four kinds of conflicts of interest and their concrete manifestations in the process of collective forest right transfer, such as government and production operator, farmer collective and forest farmer, outflow party and inflow side, production operator and ecological beneficiary, and then from the legal level, the paper analyzes the four main conflicts of interest and their concrete performance.At the institutional level, the executive level analyzes the root causes of conflicts of interest, finally from the legal level to improve the laws and regulations, to clarify the ownership of collective forest rights transfer and the development of flexible and diverse transfer methods;Put forward from the system level to build a unified collective forest rights trading platform, establish a scientific forest assets evaluation system, set up a high level of intermediary service organizations, establish a financial incentive mechanism, from the executive level to put forward more just government law enforcement,The government position more clearly and so on a series of interests balance construction strategy.The aim is to promote the sustainable, rapid and healthy development of forestry and to realize the harmonious development of society.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江農(nóng)林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.63;D923.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊欣;蔡銀鶯;張安錄;;農(nóng)田生態(tài)補(bǔ)償利益相關(guān)群體分析[J];華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2017年01期

2 毛敏;周伯煌;;我國(guó)集體林權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)中相關(guān)方利益協(xié)調(diào)的路徑探析[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年06期

3 劉浩;劉璨;;我國(guó)集體林產(chǎn)權(quán)制度改革及配套改革相關(guān)政策問題研究[J];林業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年09期

4 徐莉萍;趙冠男;戴子禮;;國(guó)外市場(chǎng)機(jī)制下森林生態(tài)效益補(bǔ)償定價(jià)理論及其借鑒[J];農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2016年08期

5 閆娟;;財(cái)政助推集體林權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)的對(duì)策[J];中國(guó)財(cái)政;2016年13期

6 潘登;諸江;;論集體林地承包權(quán)與經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)的分離與流轉(zhuǎn)[J];中南林業(yè)科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年02期

7 邱天;;森林資產(chǎn)評(píng)估核查的內(nèi)容與方法[J];中國(guó)林業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè);2016年03期

8 任伯平;;探索開展“三權(quán)分離” 完善林權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)體系——重慶市永川區(qū)開展集體林業(yè)綜合改革試驗(yàn)示范紀(jì)實(shí)[J];林業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年01期

9 謝嗣強(qiáng);楊愛華;;林權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)主導(dǎo)模式與制度創(chuàng)新[J];林業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2015年06期

10 管洪彥;;農(nóng)民集體的現(xiàn)實(shí)困惑與改革路徑[J];政法論叢;2015年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 孫文琪;國(guó)有林區(qū)林權(quán)改革利益主體博弈分析[D];東北林業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

2 李壽廷;土地征收法律制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

3 李紅星;中國(guó)林業(yè)利益機(jī)制問題研究[D];東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 羅慧;郴州市集體林權(quán)制度改革研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2016年

2 陽琴;湖南省常寧市集體林權(quán)制度改革的成效及深化研究[D];中南林業(yè)科技大學(xué);2016年

3 李濃濃;集體林權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)法律問題研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2015年

4 宋洋;公司重整法律問題研究[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2013年

5 王博;權(quán)利要求的功能性限定解釋研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

6 程果;林權(quán)制度研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2009年

7 邵彬;集體林權(quán)制度改革政策的博弈分析[D];南京林業(yè)大學(xué);2008年

8 李愛平;林權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)制度研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1732981