發(fā)布時間：2018-03-28 15:26

  本文選題：地質(zhì)災(zāi)害　切入點(diǎn)：地質(zhì)災(zāi)害危險性評估　出處：《福州大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】：為實(shí)現(xiàn)防災(zāi)減災(zāi)的目的，在“預(yù)防為主、避讓與治理相結(jié)合”的地質(zhì)災(zāi)害防治原則指導(dǎo)下，建立了地質(zhì)災(zāi)害危險性評估法律制度。如今，這項(xiàng)制度實(shí)施已經(jīng)十年，在取得一定成效的同時，也暴露出不少的問題和缺陷，使得寫作本文成為必要。 第一部分對地質(zhì)災(zāi)害危險性評估法律制度的產(chǎn)生過程及其所包含的內(nèi)容做了較為詳細(xì)的介紹。地質(zhì)災(zāi)害危險性評估法律制度建立時間晚，，發(fā)展歷程短，現(xiàn)處于發(fā)展過程之中，遠(yuǎn)未達(dá)到成熟的狀態(tài)。因?yàn)榻r間晚，所以很少有人對它進(jìn)行研究，因?yàn)槠浒l(fā)展歷程短，所以其內(nèi)容還須充實(shí)與完善。 第二部分在指出地質(zhì)災(zāi)害危險性評估法律制度運(yùn)行中出現(xiàn)諸多問題的基礎(chǔ)上，分析造成這些問題的原因，從查找問題產(chǎn)生的根源入手來論證制度設(shè)計上的缺陷和不足。由于制度設(shè)計的缺陷，受到危險性評估范圍的限制，某些本應(yīng)該進(jìn)行評估的項(xiàng)目沒有得到評估，從而缺少相應(yīng)的防治措施，當(dāng)相關(guān)主管部門的日常管理工作不足以彌補(bǔ)這些缺陷時，災(zāi)害的發(fā)生便不可避免；與此相反的是，一些項(xiàng)目卻被重復(fù)評估，項(xiàng)目用地土地適宜性被反復(fù)多次評價，造成了不必要的浪費(fèi)。評估單位對評估結(jié)果負(fù)責(zé)流于形式，導(dǎo)致評估責(zé)任主體花錢買報告，評估單位收錢出報告，評估報告在用地審批手續(xù)辦理完成之后便形同廢紙。未建立地質(zhì)災(zāi)害危險性評估專業(yè)人員執(zhí)業(yè)制度及缺少評估收費(fèi)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)等等問題的存在，不利于先進(jìn)評估技術(shù)的應(yīng)用和發(fā)展，不利于創(chuàng)新性評估理論的產(chǎn)生，阻礙了危險性評估制度健康運(yùn)行和發(fā)展。 第三部分針對第二部分分析過的問題，提出具體的解決措施。修改和補(bǔ)充有關(guān)法律規(guī)定以解決評估不足和重復(fù)評估的問題；廢除不利于評估單位承擔(dān)責(zé)任的有關(guān)規(guī)定，將評估單位對評估結(jié)果負(fù)責(zé)具體化，設(shè)立地質(zhì)災(zāi)害危險性評估賠償系數(shù)來計算賠償責(zé)任份額，以落實(shí)評估單位非故意情況下評估結(jié)果不合格致?lián)p時應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)的賠償責(zé)任；建立注冊地質(zhì)災(zāi)害評估師執(zhí)業(yè)制度以提高和保證從業(yè)人員專業(yè)素質(zhì)；建立評估收費(fèi)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以規(guī)范評估費(fèi)用的收取。 最后，本文得出結(jié)論，地質(zhì)災(zāi)害危險性評估制度的完善一方面要對已經(jīng)規(guī)定的不當(dāng)條款修改、補(bǔ)充、刪除，另一方面要增加新的內(nèi)容以充實(shí)那些對評估制度來說必須但還空白的部分。地質(zhì)災(zāi)害危險性評估工作只有在良好的評估制度保證下，才能更好地實(shí)現(xiàn)評估目的，促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會的可持續(xù)發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:In order to achieve the aim of disaster prevention and mitigation , the legal system of geological disaster risk assessment has been established under the guidance of the principle of prevention and control of geological disasters . Now , the system has been implemented for 10 years . At the same time , it has exposed a lot of problems and defects , making it necessary to write this paper .

The first part introduces the production process of the legal system of geological disaster risk assessment and the content contained in it . The establishment of the legal system of geological disaster risk assessment is too late , the development course is short , it is still in the development process , it is far from reaching the mature state . Because of the late establishment time , few have studied it , because the development course is short , so its contents must be enriched and perfect .

In the second part , the causes of these problems are analyzed based on the analysis of the problems in the operation of the legal system of geological disaster risk assessment .
In contrast , some projects are repeatedly evaluated , and the suitability of the land suitability of the project land is repeatedly evaluated , resulting in unnecessary waste .

The third part , aiming at the problem of the second part , puts forward concrete measures to solve the problem of insufficient evaluation and repeated assessment by amending and supplementing relevant laws ;
Abolish the relevant regulations which are not conducive to the evaluation unit ' s liability , and the evaluation unit shall be responsible for the assessment results , and establish the compensation coefficient for hazard assessment of geological hazards to calculate the share of the liability for compensation , so as to implement the liability for compensation which should be borne by the evaluation unit when the assessment result is not acceptable ;
Establish the practice system of registered geological disaster assessment division to improve and guarantee the professional quality of practitioners ;
Establish an assessment fee standard to regulate the collection of assessment fees .

Finally , this paper concludes that the improvement of the risk assessment system of geological hazards should be revised , supplemented and deleted on the other hand . On the other hand , it is necessary to add new contents to enrich those parts which must be blank in the evaluation system .

【學(xué)位授予單位】：福州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D922.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 高亞峰;高亞偉;;中國城市地質(zhì)災(zāi)害的類型及防治[J];城市地質(zhì);2008年02期

2 成玉祥;張駿;段玉貴;;地質(zhì)災(zāi)害危險性評估工作中存在的問題與解決途徑探討[J];地球與環(huán)境;2005年S1期

3 黃德林;;地質(zhì)災(zāi)害防治條款在土地出讓合同中約定的可行性研究[J];法學(xué)評論;2008年05期

4 賀為民;肖丹鳳;翟永田;;城市總體規(guī)劃區(qū)地質(zhì)災(zāi)害危險性評估研究[J];防災(zāi)科技學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年03期

5 韓沐群;建設(shè)用地地質(zhì)災(zāi)害危險性評估的意義和作用[J];甘肅科學(xué)學(xué)報;2003年S1期

6 章偉民;對地質(zhì)災(zāi)害危險性評估中幾個問題的探討[J];甘肅科學(xué)學(xué)報;2003年S1期

7 王志榮,周自強(qiáng),白曉華;小城鎮(zhèn)建設(shè)中的地質(zhì)災(zāi)害問題研究[J];甘肅科學(xué)學(xué)報;2004年03期

本文編號：1676907