本文關(guān)鍵詞： 生態(tài)侵權(quán)救濟(jì) 生態(tài)損害賠償 環(huán)境侵權(quán) 生態(tài)侵權(quán) 生態(tài)安全　出處：《中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)（北京）》2009年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 本文對(duì)于生態(tài)侵權(quán)救濟(jì)法律問(wèn)題的論述,是基于環(huán)境侵權(quán)既包括對(duì)壞境的污染還包括對(duì)生態(tài)的損害這一前提下進(jìn)行的。作為環(huán)境侵權(quán)類型之一的生態(tài)侵權(quán),引起生態(tài)損害的發(fā)生,影響生態(tài)平衡,直接關(guān)系到與人類生存相關(guān)的生態(tài)安全問(wèn)題。生態(tài)安全表面上看,是生態(tài)系統(tǒng)對(duì)于人類的安全,但實(shí)際的基礎(chǔ)問(wèn)題是首先確保生態(tài)系統(tǒng)自身的安全。這就需要我們不應(yīng)僅僅局限于環(huán)境污染這一個(gè)方面來(lái)做出反應(yīng),而應(yīng)重視生態(tài)侵權(quán)的救濟(jì),把生態(tài)侵權(quán)作為環(huán)境侵權(quán)的一個(gè)重要內(nèi)容,引入到現(xiàn)行法律制度當(dāng)中。 本文主要從救濟(jì)的視角出發(fā),分析生態(tài)侵權(quán)的理論基礎(chǔ),聯(lián)系環(huán)境侵權(quán)及污染型環(huán)境侵權(quán)的特征,完成對(duì)相關(guān)法律制度的分析。生態(tài)損害的特點(diǎn)及現(xiàn)代環(huán)境倫理觀,決定了生態(tài)侵權(quán)救濟(jì)的重要性,對(duì)生態(tài)侵權(quán)損害進(jìn)行救濟(jì)是維護(hù)生態(tài)安全、保持社會(huì)穩(wěn)定的需要。通過(guò)對(duì)生態(tài)侵權(quán)救濟(jì)的法律關(guān)系、救濟(jì)原則、救濟(jì)方式等理論上的分析,可以更好地把握建立生態(tài)侵權(quán)救濟(jì)體系的重要性。文章在梳理相關(guān)問(wèn)題的過(guò)程中,重點(diǎn)把關(guān)注點(diǎn)放在了關(guān)于生態(tài)侵權(quán)歸責(zé)原則的選擇、因果關(guān)系的界定及公私法在救濟(jì)制度中的結(jié)合這幾個(gè)方面。因?yàn)檎菍?duì)于這幾個(gè)重點(diǎn)問(wèn)題的探討,才完善了建立生態(tài)侵權(quán)救濟(jì)體系的大體思路。隨后就是為探索具有環(huán)境法自身特色的救濟(jì)途徑,所提出的完善這個(gè)體系的幾點(diǎn)建議。文章的最后,基于生態(tài)侵權(quán)救濟(jì)的研究與生態(tài)安全戰(zhàn)略實(shí)施的相關(guān)性,重新考慮了環(huán)境法上的生態(tài)安全的理念,展開(kāi)了對(duì)生態(tài)安全立法上的探索。 總之,現(xiàn)行的環(huán)境侵權(quán)救濟(jì)制度中,很少有專門(mén)性、系統(tǒng)性的對(duì)于生態(tài)侵權(quán)損害救濟(jì)的價(jià)值和功能的探討。我國(guó)現(xiàn)行立法中的環(huán)境侵權(quán)主要指因環(huán)境污染而造成他人損害或危險(xiǎn)的事實(shí)。以環(huán)境污染為中心對(duì)環(huán)境侵權(quán)進(jìn)行建構(gòu)已經(jīng)成為傳統(tǒng)思維的慣例,無(wú)論是在民法的侵權(quán)法領(lǐng)域,還是在環(huán)境法的視野中,均忽略了生態(tài)遭受破壞的那一部分損害填補(bǔ),這是不全面,也是不公平的�；谀壳皩�(duì)生態(tài)侵權(quán)有關(guān)的問(wèn)題和事實(shí)的分析,有必要對(duì)于救濟(jì)制度進(jìn)行總結(jié)和探討,這對(duì)于我國(guó)生態(tài)安全戰(zhàn)略的制定與實(shí)施,無(wú)疑會(huì)起到積極的作用。
[Abstract]:This paper discusses the legal issues of ecological tort relief based on the premise that environmental tort includes both environmental pollution and ecological damage. As one of the types of environmental tort ecological tort. The occurrence of ecological damage, the impact of ecological balance, directly related to the survival of human ecological security issues. Ecological security, on the surface, is the ecosystem for human security. However, the practical basic problem is to ensure the safety of the ecosystem itself, which requires us not only to limit our response to environmental pollution, but also to pay attention to the remedy of ecological infringement. As an important part of environmental tort, ecological tort is introduced into the current legal system. From the perspective of relief, this paper analyzes the theoretical basis of ecological tort, linking the characteristics of environmental tort and pollution-type environmental tort. The completion of the analysis of relevant legal systems, ecological damage characteristics and modern environmental ethics, determines the importance of ecological tort relief, ecological tort damage relief is to maintain ecological security. The need to maintain social stability. Through the ecological tort relief of the legal relationship, relief principles, relief methods and other theoretical analysis. Can better grasp the importance of the establishment of ecological tort relief system. In the process of combing the relevant issues, the article focuses on the selection of the principle of liability for ecological infringement. The definition of causality and the combination of public and private law in the relief system. Only then has perfected the establishment ecology tort relief system general idea. Then is in order to explore the environmental law own characteristic relief way, proposed consummates this system several suggestions. Based on the correlation between the research of ecological tort relief and the implementation of ecological security strategy, this paper reconsiders the concept of ecological security in environmental law and explores the legislation of ecological security. In a word, there are few specialties in the current relief system of environmental tort. A systematic discussion on the value and function of the remedy for ecological tort damage. The environmental tort in the current legislation of our country mainly refers to the fact that environmental pollution causes damage or danger to others. Taking environmental pollution as the center, it invades the environment. The construction of the right has become the convention of the traditional thinking. Whether in the field of tort law of civil law or in the field of environmental law, it is incomplete to ignore the damage to the ecological damage. Based on the analysis of the problems and facts related to ecological tort, it is necessary to summarize and discuss the relief system, which is the formulation and implementation of ecological security strategy in China. There is no doubt that it will play a positive role.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)（北京）
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D922.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊萍;;環(huán)境侵權(quán)損害賠償制度的完善——從環(huán)境責(zé)任社會(huì)化的角度[J];常州工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2007年02期

2 劉文燕;論生態(tài)侵權(quán)的歸責(zé)原則[J];中國(guó)司法;2005年04期

3 李艷芳;我國(guó)生態(tài)安全的現(xiàn)狀與法律保障[J];法商研究;2004年02期

4 王立峰;關(guān)于懲罰性賠償?shù)囊恍┧伎肌媾c《民法同質(zhì)補(bǔ)償原則新思考》一文作者商榷[J];法學(xué);2000年06期

5 竺效;;反思松花江水污染事故行政罰款的法律尷尬——以生態(tài)損害填補(bǔ)責(zé)任制為視角[J];法學(xué);2007年03期

6 郭萌;;淺論生態(tài)侵權(quán)救濟(jì)的理論困境[J];法制與社會(huì);2006年24期

7 曲格平;關(guān)注生態(tài)安全之一:生態(tài)環(huán)境問(wèn)題已經(jīng)成為國(guó)家安全的熱門(mén)話題[J];環(huán)境保護(hù);2002年05期

8 王明遠(yuǎn);中國(guó)環(huán)境侵權(quán)救濟(jì)法律制度的現(xiàn)狀及其完善[J];環(huán)境導(dǎo)報(bào);2000年03期

9 張才琴;;我國(guó)生態(tài)安全問(wèn)題的法律對(duì)策[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)與管理;2007年09期

10 黃偉明;;淺議環(huán)境生態(tài)損害及其救濟(jì)[J];科學(xué)咨詢;2006年09期

，

本文編號(hào)：1491950