仲裁是當(dāng)前解決跨境商事?tīng)?zhēng)議最受歡迎的程序性機(jī)制，這主要?dú)w因于1958年《紐約公約》為仲裁裁決的全球執(zhí)行提供了根本保障。自1987年至2024年，《紐約公約》在中國(guó)已生效37年并得到了有效實(shí)施，絕大多數(shù)外國(guó)仲裁裁決均獲得了中國(guó)法院的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行。然而，司法實(shí)踐中仍然存在不當(dāng)適用和解釋《紐約公約》的現(xiàn)象。本文首先論述中國(guó)法院裁判決定的具體分析數(shù)據(jù)，其次闡述中國(guó)法院裁判決定所蘊(yùn)含的主要裁判立場(chǎng)，最后旨在提出具體的完善意見(jiàn)，以使其符合《紐約公約》的文本與精神。

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：31 頁(yè)

【文章目錄】：
I.INTRODUCTION
II.DATA ANALYSIS OF CHINESE COURT DECISIONS ONTHE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OFFOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS
    A.Overall Situation of Recognition and Enforcement
    B.Annual Number of Cases
    C.Case Number Handled by Diff erent Provinces
    D.Distribution of Foreign Arbitration Institutions and Ad Hoc Arbitral Tribunals
    E.Concrete Defenses Against Recognition and Enforcement
III.CHINESE COURTS’MAIN JURISPRUDENCE ON THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS
    A.Incapacity of the Parties and Invalidity ofthe Arbitration Agreement
    B.Violation of the Due Process Principle
    C.The Award Beyond the Scope of the Arbitration Agreement
    D.Improper Composition of the Tribunal and Arbitral Procedure
    E.The Arbitral Award Being Vacated or Suspended
    F.Non-Arbitrability of Dispute
    G.Violation of Public Policy
    H.The Limitation Period of the Recognition and Enforcement Application
IV.ANALYSIS AND REFINEMENTS OFTHE JURISPRUDENCE FOR REVIEWING FOREIGNARBITRAL AWARDS IN CHINA
    A.Proper Application of Article 5.1.1 of the New York Convention
    B.Strict Interpretation of Article 5.1.2 ofthe New York Convention
    C.Liberal Interpretation of Article 5.1.3 of the New York Convention
    D.Restrictive Interpretation of Article 5.2.2 of the New York Convention
    E.Refi nement of the Domestic Rule on Procedure Outside the New York Convention
V.CONCLUDING REMARKS



本文編號(hào)：4020136