【摘要】：緣起于上個(gè)世紀(jì)20年代的公司社會(huì)責(zé)任這一概念,一經(jīng)提出便立刻招致來自社會(huì)各界的激烈紛爭(zhēng)與討論。時(shí)至今日,眾多國家已經(jīng)在法律上明文規(guī)定公司應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)社會(huì)責(zé)任,尤其以英美、德日等主要發(fā)達(dá)國家為代表,不僅在法律上對(duì)此作出了比較完善的規(guī)定,并且在實(shí)踐中,公司也良好地踐行了其承擔(dān)的社會(huì)責(zé)任;我國公司法亦旗幟鮮明地宣布,公司應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)社會(huì)責(zé)任,這些都是前人通過對(duì)公司社會(huì)責(zé)任理論之研究,從而取得的實(shí)踐成果。 本文從規(guī)范化的角度出發(fā),從具體制度上研究公司社會(huì)責(zé)任,從而修正傳統(tǒng)公司理論的股東中心主義,以期達(dá)到推進(jìn)公司社會(huì)責(zé)任落實(shí)之目的;具體到我國,公司在追求利益過程中出現(xiàn)了越來越多的違法違紀(jì)的現(xiàn)象,有的甚至導(dǎo)致了國際摩擦……面對(duì)公司在自身發(fā)展中對(duì)社會(huì)造成的不利影響,從具體制度上研究公司社會(huì)責(zé)任對(duì)促進(jìn)公司健康發(fā)展、穩(wěn)定社會(huì)意義重大。 文章主體內(nèi)容共分為六個(gè)部分。第一部分是引言,最后一部分是結(jié)語。文章第二章介紹了公司社會(huì)責(zé)任理論的緣起和發(fā)展,對(duì)國內(nèi)外相關(guān)研究進(jìn)行了綜述,從而得出公司社會(huì)責(zé)任規(guī)范化之內(nèi)涵,找出本文的切入點(diǎn)。 第三章主要采取比較研究方法、歷史分析法,對(duì)主要發(fā)達(dá)國家的公司社會(huì)責(zé)任規(guī)范化現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行的考察和述評(píng),總結(jié)了我國可以借鑒之處;最后闡述了公司社會(huì)責(zé)任規(guī)范化的必要性。 第四章分析了我國公司社會(huì)責(zé)任規(guī)范化相關(guān)問題,主要是從公司法以及相關(guān)部門法規(guī)范現(xiàn)狀上,分析其優(yōu)點(diǎn)和不足;同時(shí),筆者立足于我國公司治理之實(shí)際情況,綜合分析了國內(nèi)學(xué)者關(guān)于促進(jìn)我國公司社會(huì)責(zé)任規(guī)范化的主要觀點(diǎn),并提出自己的主張和看法。 文章第五章通過對(duì)上述部分的比較分析,提出了完善我國公司社會(huì)責(zé)任規(guī)范化體系的建議,望能有助于規(guī)范并落實(shí)我國公司社會(huì)責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:Originated from the concept of corporate social responsibility in the 1920s, it immediately led to fierce disputes and discussions from all walks of life. Up to now, many countries have explicitly stipulated that companies should bear social responsibility in law, especially in Britain, the United States, Germany and Japan and other major developed countries as representatives, not only in the law has made relatively perfect provisions, and in practice, the company has also carried out its social responsibility well; The company law of our country has also made a clear-cut declaration that the company should bear social responsibility, which are the practical results obtained by the forefathers through the study of the theory of corporate social responsibility. From the point of view of standardization, this paper studies corporate social responsibility from the specific system, so as to revise the shareholder centralism of traditional company theory in order to promote the implementation of corporate social responsibility; specifically, in our country, there are more and more illegal and disciplinary phenomena in the process of pursuing interests, some of which even lead to international friction. In the face of the adverse impact of the company's own development on the society, it is of great significance to study the corporate social responsibility in order to promote the healthy development of the company and stabilize the society from the specific system. The main content of the article is divided into six parts. The first part is the introduction, the last part is the conclusion. The second chapter introduces the origin and development of corporate social responsibility theory, summarizes the relevant research at home and abroad, so as to obtain the connotation of corporate social responsibility standardization, and find out the entry point of this paper. The third chapter mainly adopts comparative research method and historical analysis method to investigate and review the present situation of corporate social responsibility standardization in major developed countries, summarizes what can be used for reference in our country, and finally expounds the necessity of corporate social responsibility standardization. The fourth chapter analyzes the problems related to the standardization of corporate social responsibility in China, mainly from the current situation of company law and related departmental laws, analyzes its advantages and disadvantages; at the same time, based on the actual situation of corporate governance in our country, the author comprehensively analyzes the main views of domestic scholars on promoting the standardization of corporate social responsibility in China, and puts forward his own opinions and views. Through the comparative analysis of the above parts, the fifth chapter puts forward some suggestions to improve the standardization system of corporate social responsibility in our country, hoping to help standardize and implement the corporate social responsibility in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 崔欣;對(duì)公司的社會(huì)責(zé)任理論的探討[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年02期

2 鄭祝君;公司與社會(huì)的和諧發(fā)展——美國公司制度的理念變遷[J];法商研究;2004年04期

3 沈四寶;程華兒;;經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化與我國企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任制度的構(gòu)建[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年03期

4 方波;;論公司社會(huì)責(zé)任的法理基礎(chǔ)[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年02期

5 仲大軍;;當(dāng)前中國企業(yè)的社會(huì)責(zé)任[J];中國經(jīng)濟(jì)快訊;2002年38期

6 周澤南,李荃;關(guān)于推進(jìn)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的思考[J];求實(shí);2005年11期

7 黃秋娜;;淺論董事的勤勉義務(wù)與責(zé)任[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2007年18期

8 邵秀玲;劉少山;;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的倫理思考[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2008年05期

9 張鋒;;論公司的社會(huì)責(zé)任[J];探索;2008年06期

10 朱慈蘊(yùn);;公司的社會(huì)責(zé)任：游走于法律責(zé)任與道德準(zhǔn)則之間[J];中外法學(xué);2008年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 鄭綠峰;公司社會(huì)責(zé)任運(yùn)動(dòng)的理論與實(shí)證分析[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2506483