【摘要】：股東會決議不成立制度屬于公司法上決議瑕疵救濟體系的一部分，其調整的是公司決議程序有嚴重瑕疵的情形。股東會決議瑕疵包括內容瑕疵和程序瑕疵，無論股東會決議出現(xiàn)何種瑕疵，都可能對股東的利益造成損害，因此，各國公司立法都確立了決議瑕疵的救濟體系，為因決議有瑕疵而利益受損的股東提供法律救濟，保護公司股東的合法權益。關于決議瑕疵的救濟體系，有的國家規(guī)定了決議無效之訴、決議可撤銷之訴以及決議不存在之訴，對于司法實踐中出現(xiàn)的決議瑕疵的效力糾紛實現(xiàn)了細致、明確的調整，如日本、韓國等。其中決議不存在之訴即是本文所要探討的決議不成立之訴。還有一些國家僅規(guī)定了決議無效之訴和決議可撤銷之訴，對于決議不成立之訴未作規(guī)定，但學說和判例上卻認為有確立決議不成立制度的必要，如德國、中國及我國臺灣地區(qū)。本文試圖運用實證分析和比較分析的研究方法，針對決議不成立制度進行探討，認為我國應該引入這一制度，以滿足司法實踐的需要，完善我國公司決議瑕疵的救濟體系。 除引言外，全文分為五個部分，共約兩萬字。 第一部分為案例介紹及問題的提出，通過對“劉華與華泉等股權轉讓、公司決議糾紛上訴案”這一案例的介紹，反映出我國司法實踐對決議不成立制度的需要，引出本文的論題。 第二部分為決議不成立制度相關理論概述，主要介紹了決議不成立制度的適用情形、決議不成立的法律后果、決議不成立的救濟以及決議不成立制度的制度價值。通過對決議不成立制度的理論介紹，反映出它和決議無效制度、決議可撤銷制度的區(qū)別，以及其所具有的制度價值。 第三部分以實際案例為例證，分析了我國相關立法的不足。我國《公司法》對于公司決議程序有瑕疵的情形，僅規(guī)定了決議可撤銷制度，沒有根據(jù)程序瑕疵程度的不同進行區(qū)分調整。司法實踐中，決議程序有嚴重瑕疵的案件，并不能完全得到妥當?shù)恼{整，反映了相關立法的不足。本部分以幾個較具代表性的案件為例證，，說明我國相關立法存在的問題。 第四部分為域外比較，介紹了日本、韓國、德國及我國臺灣地區(qū)有關決議不成立制度的立法、學說與判例，以期從域外的相關經驗中獲得啟示，為我國立法和司法實踐中相關問題的解決提供幫助。 第五部分為對策建議，針對我國相關立法的不足，結合決議不成立制度的制度功能及域外經驗，提出了自己的建議。最高人民法院民二庭于2010年擬定的《關于適用中華人民共和國公司法若干問題的規(guī)定（四）（征求意見稿）》對于決議不成立的情形進行了調整，本部分還對此《征求意見稿》進行了評價。
[Abstract]:The system of shareholders' non-establishment is a part of the remedy system of resolution defects in company law, which adjusts the situation of serious defects in the procedure of company resolution. The defects of shareholders' resolutions include content defects and procedural defects. No matter what kind of defects appear in the shareholders' resolutions, they may cause harm to the interests of shareholders. Therefore, the company legislation of various countries has established the remedy system for the resolution defects. To provide legal relief for shareholders whose interests are damaged by defective resolutions, and to protect the legitimate rights and interests of shareholders of the company. With regard to the relief system of resolution defects, some countries have stipulated the action of resolution invalidity, resolution revocable action and resolution non-existence action, which have made a detailed and definite adjustment to the dispute of the validity of the resolution defect that appears in judicial practice. Such as Japan, Korea and so on. The action of resolution without existence is the action of resolution that is discussed in this paper. There are still some countries that only stipulate the action of invalid resolution and revocable action of resolution, but do not stipulate the action of resolution that is not established, but the doctrine and the precedent think that it is necessary to establish the system of invalid resolution, such as Germany, China and Taiwan area of our country. This article attempts to use the empirical analysis and comparative analysis of the research method to discuss the system of resolution not established, and think that our country should introduce this system to meet the needs of judicial practice and perfect the remedy system of the defect of the company resolution in our country. In addition to the introduction, the full text is divided into five parts, a total of about 20,000 words. The first part is the introduction of the case and the questions, through the introduction of the case of "Liu Hua and Hua Quan equity transfer, the appeal case of the company resolution dispute", which reflects the need of the judicial practice of our country for the resolution not to be established. Lead to the topic of this paper. The second part is an overview of the relevant theories of the unestablished resolution system. It mainly introduces the application of the non-established resolution system, the legal consequences of the resolution not established, the relief of the resolution not established and the institutional value of the non-established resolution system. Through the theoretical introduction of the unestablished system of resolution, it reflects the difference between it and the invalid system of resolution, the system of resolution revocability, and the institutional value of the system. The third part takes the actual case as an example, analyzes the insufficiency of the relevant legislation of our country. The Company Law of our country only prescribes the resolution revocable system for the cases where the company resolution procedure is defective and does not distinguish and adjust according to the degree of procedural defects. In judicial practice, the cases where the procedure of resolution is seriously flawed can not be adjusted properly, which reflects the deficiency of relevant legislation. This part takes several representative cases as an example to illustrate the problems existing in the relevant legislation of our country. The fourth part is the extraterritorial comparison, introducing the legislation, doctrine and jurisprudence of the relevant resolutions of Japan, South Korea, Germany and Taiwan, in order to obtain enlightenment from the relevant experiences abroad. To provide help to solve the related problems in our country's legislation and judicial practice. The fifth part is the countermeasure suggestion, aiming at the insufficiency of the relevant legislation of our country, combining with the system function and the outside experience of the resolution not to establish the system, put forward own suggestion. The provisions on the Application of the Company Law of the people's Republic of China (4) (draft for opinions) formulated by the second Chamber of the people's Court of the Supreme people's Court in 2010 have adjusted the situation in which the resolution is not established. This part also evaluates this draft for comments.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前9條

1 陳醇;;意思形成與意思表示的區(qū)別:決議的獨立性初探[J];比較法研究;2008年06期

2 姜山;;公司機關決議瑕疵訴訟若干法律問題探析[J];法律適用;2011年08期

3 丁紹寬;;股東會瑕疵決議的效力研究[J];法學;2009年06期

4 吳建斌;;公司決議虛構的法律盲區(qū)[J];董事會;2011年03期

5 劉俊海;;論法官公司爭訟裁判思維的創(chuàng)新[J];法律適用;2013年05期

6 朱慈蘊;資本多數(shù)決原則與控制股東的誠信義務[J];法學研究;2004年04期

7 袁輝根;;偽造公司決議的效力認定[J];人民司法;2010年06期

8 李建偉;;公司決議效力瑕疵類型及其救濟體系再構建——以股東大會決議可撤銷為中心[J];商事法論集;2008年02期

9 李春鵬;;偽造股東簽名對股東會決議影響的法理分析[J];人民司法;2012年18期

本文編號：2395405