【摘要】：公司僵局指公司在存續(xù)運行中由于股東、董事之間矛盾發(fā)展到不可調(diào)和的地步而陷入僵局,由于股東、董事之間彼此對峙無法按照同常的公司管理規(guī)則作出決策,使得公司經(jīng)營無法正常運行甚至陷入癱瘓境地。公司僵局不僅給公司、股東造成損害,而且相關(guān)債權(quán)人以及社會經(jīng)濟利益都會受到極大影響,因此應(yīng)當予以司法救濟。 目前我國《公司法》針對公司僵局僅規(guī)定了一條救濟措施,即司法解散公司。《公司法》第一百八十三條規(guī)定：“公司經(jīng)營管理發(fā)生嚴重困難,繼續(xù)存續(xù)會使股東利益受到重大損失,通過其他途徑不能解決的,持有公司全部股東表決權(quán)百分之十以上的股東,可以請求人民法院解散公司�！蓖ㄟ^司法強制解散公司,可以徹底地解決公司僵局糾紛,但同時消滅公司人格,代價巨大。面對各種公司僵局情形,現(xiàn)行法律已經(jīng)明顯滯后,急需借鑒各國關(guān)于公司僵局救濟的法律規(guī)定,結(jié)合我國司法制度環(huán)境,制定新的公司僵局救濟法律,以適應(yīng)當下之需。 本文以現(xiàn)行法律框架為基礎(chǔ),通過引入案例,提出我國目前在公司僵局司法救濟方面存在的不足,介紹國外各國在公司僵局司法救濟方面的制度設(shè)置,并作了對比分析,在此基礎(chǔ)上結(jié)合我國實際情況對完善我國公司僵局司法救濟提出一些看法。 本文大致分為四個部分。第一部分,引入康和國際發(fā)展有限公司訴北京市營力集團公司解散案,并從法律角度作出分析,提出目前我國公司僵局司法實踐中存在的問題。第二部分,以提出的問題為出發(fā)點,從訴訟選擇、受理條件、當事人地位以及解散與清算四個方面分析公司僵局司法救濟的基本問題。第三部分,介紹英國、美國、德國及同本等國在公司僵局糾紛解決方面的規(guī)定,對比分析我國目前在這方面存在的問題,為接下來完善我國公司僵局司法救濟法律提出建議打下基礎(chǔ)。最后一部分,提出完善公司僵局司法救濟制度的構(gòu)想,明確提出公司僵局概念,引入強制股權(quán)收購制度,重視司法解散公司制度,而指定代理人和臨時董事制度因制度環(huán)境和文化差異等原因目前并不適合引入。
[Abstract]:Corporate deadlock refers to the deadlock in the company because of the irreconcilable contradiction between the shareholders and directors in the course of the company's surviving operation. As a result of the shareholders, the directors can not make decisions according to the common rules of the company management because of the confrontation between the shareholders and the directors. The company can not run properly or even become paralyzed. Corporate deadlock not only damages the company, shareholders, but also the relevant creditors and social economic interests, so it should be given judicial relief. At present, the Company Law of our country provides only one relief measure against the deadlock of the company, that is, judicial dissolution of the company. Article 183 of the Company Law stipulates: "serious difficulties have occurred in the management of the company." If the continued existence of the shareholders will cause serious losses to the interests of the shareholders and cannot be solved by other means, the shareholders who hold more than 10% of the voting rights of all shareholders of the company may request the people's court to dissolve the company. " Dissolving the company by judicial compulsion can solve the deadlock dispute thoroughly, but at the same time, the company personality can be eliminated, and the cost is enormous. In the face of various situations of corporate deadlock, the current law has obviously lagged behind, so it is urgent to draw lessons from the legal provisions of various countries on the relief of corporate deadlock, and to formulate a new relief law for corporate deadlock according to the judicial system environment of our country, in order to meet the needs of the present. Based on the current legal framework and by introducing a case, this paper points out the deficiencies in the judicial relief of the corporate deadlock in China, introduces the system settings of the judicial relief of the corporate deadlock in foreign countries, and makes a comparative analysis. On the basis of this, the author puts forward some views on how to perfect the judicial remedy of corporate deadlock in our country combined with the actual situation in our country. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part introduces the case of Kang he International Development Co., Ltd. v. Beijing Yingli Group Company, and analyzes it from the point of view of law, and points out the problems existing in the judicial practice of the current corporate deadlock in our country. The second part analyzes the basic problems of judicial remedy of corporate deadlock from four aspects: the choice of litigation, the conditions of acceptance, the status of the parties and the dissolution and liquidation. The third part introduces the provisions of the United Kingdom, the United States, Germany and other countries in the settlement of the company deadlock dispute, and analyzes the existing problems in this respect in China. It lays the foundation for perfecting the judicial remedy law of company deadlock in our country. In the last part, the author puts forward the idea of perfecting the judicial remedy system of corporate deadlock, puts forward clearly the concept of corporate deadlock, introduces the system of compulsory stock acquisition, and attaches importance to the judicial dissolution of the company system. However, the appointed agent and temporary director system are not suitable for introduction due to the differences of institutional environment and culture.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 余t，

本文編號：2379913