公司法人格混同的理論和判例研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-29 07:28
【摘要】：人格混同在國內(nèi)外的司法實(shí)踐中都有著大量的適用,尤其在我國。筆者試圖運(yùn)用相關(guān)理論學(xué)說和司法判例對人格混同進(jìn)行分析和研究。本文共分為6個(gè)部分：引言部分主要介紹了本文選題的目的和研究方法。第二部分對人格混同進(jìn)行了概述,界定了人格混同的內(nèi)涵,以及簡單闡述了人格混同產(chǎn)生的緣由。第三部分著重分析人格混同的理論基礎(chǔ),以美國、德國和日本的相關(guān)學(xué)說為基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)人格混同的理論基礎(chǔ)主要有美國的代理說、企業(yè)整體說和另一個(gè)自我說,德國的客觀濫用說以及日本的中義說。第四部分著重以案例為主,探究了人格混同在國外司法中的實(shí)踐情況,得出需要綜合考慮人格因素的各個(gè)方面進(jìn)行認(rèn)定人格混同的結(jié)論,并且財(cái)產(chǎn)混同和業(yè)務(wù)混同是認(rèn)定人格混同的核心標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。第五部分以36個(gè)樣本判決為中心,著墨分析和研究了人格混同在我國司法實(shí)踐中的適用情形,并通過個(gè)案分析和數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計(jì)等多角度的研究,認(rèn)為人格混同的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)主要是財(cái)產(chǎn)混同、業(yè)務(wù)混同和人員混同,適格被告和責(zé)任主體應(yīng)是公司股東和相關(guān)責(zé)任主體(如姐妹公司或母子公司的關(guān)聯(lián)方),甚至實(shí)際控制人在特定情形下,也應(yīng)作為適格被告和責(zé)任主體,與此同時(shí),筆者還探討了人格混同案例的舉證責(zé)任分配問題以及《公司法》第20條在判決中的適用情況。最后的結(jié)語部分,筆者建議認(rèn)定人格混同時(shí)需要慎重,應(yīng)在達(dá)到難以區(qū)分股東與公司、姐妹公司或母子公司之間的獨(dú)立性,方可適用,以防法院濫用人格混同來否認(rèn)公司法人人格。
[Abstract]:Personality mixing has a great deal of application in judicial practice at home and abroad, especially in our country. The author tries to use relevant theories and judicial precedents to analyze and study personality mixing. This paper is divided into six parts: the introduction mainly introduces the purpose and research methods of this paper. The second part summarizes personality mixing, defines the connotation of personality mixing, and briefly expounds the reason of personality mixing. The third part focuses on the theoretical basis of personality mixing, based on the relevant theories of the United States, Germany and Japan. It is found that the theoretical basis of personality mixing mainly includes the agency theory of the United States, the theory of enterprise as a whole and another theory of self. The objective abuse theory in Germany and the Chinese meaning theory in Japan. The fourth part focuses on cases, explores the practice of personality mixing in foreign justice, and draws the conclusion that it is necessary to consider all aspects of personality factors to identify personality mixing. And property mixing and business mixing is the core standard of personality mixing. The fifth part takes 36 sample judgments as the center, analyzes and studies the application of personality mixing in judicial practice in China, and through case analysis and data statistics and other multi-angle research. It is considered that the standard of identification of personality confusion is mainly property mixing, business mixing and personnel mixing. The appropriate defendant and the subject of responsibility should be the shareholders of the company and the related subject of responsibility (such as the related party of the sister company or the parent subsidiary company). Even the actual controller should be the appropriate defendant and the subject of responsibility under certain circumstances. At the same time, the author also discusses the distribution of the burden of proof in the case of mixed personality and the application of Article 20 of Company Law in the judgment. In the last part of the conclusion, the author suggests that the personality mix should be considered carefully, and it should be applied only when it is difficult to distinguish the independence between the shareholders and the company, the sister company or the parent-subsidiary company. In case the court abuses the personality mix to deny the corporate personality.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.291.91
本文編號：2364320
[Abstract]:Personality mixing has a great deal of application in judicial practice at home and abroad, especially in our country. The author tries to use relevant theories and judicial precedents to analyze and study personality mixing. This paper is divided into six parts: the introduction mainly introduces the purpose and research methods of this paper. The second part summarizes personality mixing, defines the connotation of personality mixing, and briefly expounds the reason of personality mixing. The third part focuses on the theoretical basis of personality mixing, based on the relevant theories of the United States, Germany and Japan. It is found that the theoretical basis of personality mixing mainly includes the agency theory of the United States, the theory of enterprise as a whole and another theory of self. The objective abuse theory in Germany and the Chinese meaning theory in Japan. The fourth part focuses on cases, explores the practice of personality mixing in foreign justice, and draws the conclusion that it is necessary to consider all aspects of personality factors to identify personality mixing. And property mixing and business mixing is the core standard of personality mixing. The fifth part takes 36 sample judgments as the center, analyzes and studies the application of personality mixing in judicial practice in China, and through case analysis and data statistics and other multi-angle research. It is considered that the standard of identification of personality confusion is mainly property mixing, business mixing and personnel mixing. The appropriate defendant and the subject of responsibility should be the shareholders of the company and the related subject of responsibility (such as the related party of the sister company or the parent subsidiary company). Even the actual controller should be the appropriate defendant and the subject of responsibility under certain circumstances. At the same time, the author also discusses the distribution of the burden of proof in the case of mixed personality and the application of Article 20 of Company Law in the judgment. In the last part of the conclusion, the author suggests that the personality mix should be considered carefully, and it should be applied only when it is difficult to distinguish the independence between the shareholders and the company, the sister company or the parent-subsidiary company. In case the court abuses the personality mix to deny the corporate personality.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.291.91
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張兄來;李希;;公司法人人格否認(rèn)制度的適用范圍[J];華東經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2006年01期
2 王雁;;論一人公司中法人人格否認(rèn)制度的適用[J];和田師范�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期
3 朱慈蘊(yùn);;公司法人格否認(rèn)：從法條躍入實(shí)踐[J];清華法學(xué);2007年02期
4 周繼紅;淺談日本的公司法人格否認(rèn)之法理[J];青海師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2001年02期
5 劉貴祥;法人人格否認(rèn)理論與審判實(shí)務(wù)[J];人民司法;2001年09期
6 皮軼之;;公司法人人格否認(rèn)芻議[J];四川教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期
7 李凡;;試論法人格否認(rèn)法理中的“人格混同”——日本法近期判例的啟示[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年05期
8 劉惠明;日本公司法上的法人人格否認(rèn)法理及其應(yīng)用[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2004年01期
9 范健,趙敏;論公司法中的嚴(yán)格責(zé)任制度[J];中國法學(xué);1995年04期
10 孟勤國,張素華;公司法人人格否認(rèn)理論與股東有限責(zé)任[J];中國法學(xué);2004年03期
，本文編號：2364320
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2364320.html
最近更新
教材專著
