【摘要】：由于主客觀(guān)原因,在司法實(shí)務(wù)中,股東瑕疵出資的情況屢見(jiàn)不鮮,然現(xiàn)行公司立法并沒(méi)有專(zhuān)門(mén)規(guī)范瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓相關(guān)民事責(zé)任的規(guī)范,雖新近實(shí)施的公司法司法解釋對(duì)此作出了些許的規(guī)定,但仍未能就瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓之相關(guān)民事責(zé)任為類(lèi)型化的細(xì)化分析,理論界又對(duì)此未達(dá)成共識(shí),故由瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓而引發(fā)之瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同的效力及其轉(zhuǎn)讓后相關(guān)民事責(zé)任的承擔(dān)則成為理論界與實(shí)務(wù)界研討的重點(diǎn)。本文是藉有限責(zé)任公司為研究對(duì)象,試圖通過(guò)有限責(zé)任公司這一典型的公司型制之瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同效力及其轉(zhuǎn)讓后相關(guān)民事責(zé)任的承擔(dān)為粗淺研究,以期為實(shí)務(wù)中此類(lèi)糾紛的解決提供解決途徑和新思路。 本文共分五個(gè)部分:第一部分,問(wèn)題的提出。引出本文所要討論的兩個(gè)問(wèn)題,即瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同的效力和瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓后的責(zé)任承擔(dān)問(wèn)題。第二部分,資本瑕疵股權(quán)概述。第三部分,資本瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓契約的效力。論證得出瑕疵股東仍享有股東資格,可以自由轉(zhuǎn)讓其瑕疵股權(quán)。首先分析有關(guān)瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同效力的主要學(xué)說(shuō),進(jìn)而得出筆者的觀(guān)點(diǎn),即判斷該合同的效力依據(jù)仍舊是合同法,但并非瑕疵股權(quán)受讓人不知受讓股權(quán)系存瑕疵即為該轉(zhuǎn)讓合同可撤銷(xiāo)的原因,對(duì)此應(yīng)當(dāng)具體問(wèn)題具體分析,限制可撤銷(xiāo)合同的適用范圍。第四部分,瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓后相關(guān)民事責(zé)任分析。本部分主要論述瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓后,出讓人與受讓人對(duì)公司、公司債權(quán)人及公司設(shè)立時(shí)的守約股東的責(zé)任應(yīng)當(dāng)如何分擔(dān),出讓人與受讓人間責(zé)任又如何分擔(dān)。第五部分,相關(guān)立法完善與建議。
[Abstract]:Due to subjective and objective reasons, in judicial practice, the situation of shareholders' defective capital contribution is common, but the current company legislation does not specifically regulate the civil liability related to the transfer of defective shares. Although the newly implemented company law explanation has made some provisions on this issue, it still fails to make a detailed analysis of the types of civil liability related to the transfer of defective shares, and the theorists have not reached a consensus on this. Therefore, the validity of the defective equity transfer contract caused by the transfer of defective shares and the assumption of related civil liability after the transfer have become the focus of the theoretical and practical circles. In this paper, through limited liability company as the research object, trying to pass the limited liability company, a typical corporate system of defective equity transfer contract effectiveness and the transfer of civil liability after the transfer for a superficial study. In order to provide a solution to such disputes in practice and new ideas. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part, the question raised. This paper introduces two issues discussed in this paper, that is, the validity of the defective equity transfer contract and the liability after the defective equity transfer. The second part, the capital defect equity summary. The third part, the validity of capital defect equity transfer contract. It is concluded that defective shareholders still enjoy shareholder qualification and can freely transfer their defective shares. First of all, it analyzes the main theories about the validity of the defective equity transfer contract, and then comes to the author's opinion that the validity of the contract is still based on the contract law. However, it is not that the transferee of defective equity is the reason why the transfer contract can be revoked without knowing the defect of the transferred share right, so it should be analyzed concretely to limit the scope of application of the revocable contract. The fourth part, the analysis of civil liability after the transfer of defective shares. This part mainly discusses how the transferor and transferee share the responsibility of the company, the creditors and the shareholders when the company is set up, and how to share the responsibility between the transferee and the transferee. The fifth part, related legislation consummation and suggestion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.291.91;D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 張勇健;;新《公司法》的先進(jìn)理念與公司訴訟[J];法律適用;2006年Z1期

2 雷興虎,馮果;論股東的股權(quán)與公司的法人財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1997年02期

3 馮果;論公司股東與發(fā)起人的出資責(zé)任[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1999年03期

4 鄭曙光;股東違反出資義務(wù)違法形態(tài)與民事責(zé)任探究[J];法學(xué);2003年06期

5 周友蘇;;試析股東資格認(rèn)定中的若干法律問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué);2006年12期

6 陳u&;公司設(shè)立者的出資違約責(zé)任與資本充實(shí)責(zé)任[J];法學(xué)研究;1995年06期

7 李巧毅;論虛假出資股東對(duì)公司債權(quán)人的民事責(zé)任[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文科學(xué)版);2004年05期

8 錢(qián)玉林;禁止權(quán)利濫用的法理分析[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2002年01期

9 游偉;李盛;;訴訟視野下的瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓問(wèn)題研究[J];法治論叢(上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2008年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 陳秀麗;瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓問(wèn)題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2004年

2 吳澤遠(yuǎn);股東出資義務(wù)問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2005年

3 王洪龍;有限責(zé)任公司股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的若干法律問(wèn)題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年

4 陳晨;有限公司瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓問(wèn)題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

5 葛勇;瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同法律效力研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2008年

6 畢金營(yíng);瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的效力及責(zé)任承擔(dān)[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

7 徐勇;瑕疵出資的股份轉(zhuǎn)讓及其民事責(zé)任的承擔(dān)[D];廈門(mén)大學(xué);2008年

8 劉東方;瑕疵股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓問(wèn)題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2362079