【摘要】：公司是現(xiàn)代企業(yè)最主要的組織形式,公司有權(quán)決定自己的經(jīng)營(yíng)行為和管理行為,享有獨(dú)立的法人人格,而股東是公司的最后監(jiān)督者和最終風(fēng)險(xiǎn)承擔(dān)者。在公司運(yùn)營(yíng)中股東提起民事訴訟,不僅是救濟(jì)自身權(quán)益的有效途徑,也是利用國(guó)家司法權(quán)完善公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)的重要方式。在現(xiàn)代公司內(nèi)部治理中,公司法不僅規(guī)定了股東平等原則,還規(guī)定了資本多數(shù)決原則,因此股東的平等僅僅體現(xiàn)在表決權(quán)行使的過(guò)程之中,在表決結(jié)果中無(wú)法體現(xiàn)中小股東意見(jiàn)和利益,股東大會(huì)所作出的決議總是體現(xiàn)少數(shù)大股東的意志；加上公司經(jīng)營(yíng)中所有權(quán)與經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)分離的趨勢(shì),中小股東權(quán)益通常面臨公司控股股東和管理層的侵害。為了給中小股東權(quán)益提供有效救濟(jì)渠道,保障公司的健康發(fā)展,在證券法和公司法的修訂中,針對(duì)公司治理中存在的主要問(wèn)題,如公司董事、監(jiān)事、高管等對(duì)控制權(quán)的濫用,利用關(guān)聯(lián)交易侵蝕公司利益等,加強(qiáng)了對(duì)相關(guān)責(zé)任人員的制裁與懲罰力度,明確規(guī)定了其民事賠償責(zé)任,最重要的是完善了股東直接訴訟制度并確立了股東派生訴訟制度,賦予股東充分的訴權(quán)。證券法和公司法的修訂充分肯定了股東訴訟對(duì)加強(qiáng)股東權(quán)益保護(hù)、提高法律實(shí)施質(zhì)量、改善公司治理水平的作用,但在司法實(shí)踐股東訴權(quán)的實(shí)施效果較差,法律規(guī)定的操作性不強(qiáng),很多方面有待進(jìn)一步完善。本文運(yùn)用比較分析、實(shí)證歸納等方法具體分析了股東直接訴訟和股東派生訴訟兩大股東權(quán)益救濟(jì)制度,試圖通過(guò)中小股東民事訴權(quán)的行使,更有效的解決公司治理中控股股東對(duì)中小股東的剝奪問(wèn)題,切實(shí)保障中小股東權(quán)益,為中小股東的權(quán)利保護(hù)提供指引。
[Abstract]:The company is the most important organization form of the modern enterprise, the company has the right to decide its own management behavior and management behavior, enjoys the independent legal person personality, and the shareholder is the final supervisor and the ultimate risk bearer of the company. It is not only an effective way to remedy one's own rights and interests, but also an important way to improve the corporate governance structure by using the national judicial power. In modern corporate governance, the company law not only stipulates the principle of equality of shareholders, but also the principle of capital majority, so the equality of shareholders is only reflected in the exercise of voting rights. The opinions and interests of minority shareholders can not be reflected in the voting results, and the resolutions made by the shareholders' general meeting always reflect the will of the minority major shareholders; With the trend of separation between ownership and management, the rights and interests of minority shareholders are usually infringed by the controlling shareholders and the management of the company. In order to provide effective relief channels for the rights and interests of minority shareholders and to ensure the healthy development of the company, in the revision of the Securities Law and the Company Law, the main problems in corporate governance, such as the abuse of control rights by directors, supervisors and executives, are addressed. Using related party transactions to erode the interests of the company, it strengthens the sanction and punishment of the related liability personnel, clearly stipulates its civil liability, and the most important thing is to perfect the shareholder direct action system and establish the shareholder derivative action system. Give shareholders full rights of action. The revision of the Securities Law and the Company Law fully affirmed the role of shareholder litigation in strengthening the protection of shareholders' rights and interests, improving the quality of law enforcement and improving the level of corporate governance, but in judicial practice the effect of shareholder's right of action was poor. The operation of legal provisions is not strong, many aspects need to be further improved. This paper uses comparative analysis, empirical induction and other methods to analyze the shareholder's rights and interests relief system of shareholders' direct action and shareholder's derivative action, trying to use the exercise of minority shareholders' civil litigation right. It is more effective to solve the problem of controlling shareholders' deprivation of minority shareholders in corporate governance, to protect the rights and interests of minority shareholders, and to provide guidance for the protection of minority shareholders' rights.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔡立東;;論股東派生訴訟中被告的范圍[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2007年01期

2 何沿;史永雋;;美國(guó)企業(yè)治理結(jié)構(gòu)的變革與啟示[J];廣東行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

3 翦繼志;;論我國(guó)股東派生訴訟制度的確立與完善——兼析新《公司法》第152條[J];貴州社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年04期

4 劉鎮(zhèn);;以外資并購(gòu)境內(nèi)企業(yè)為視角論中小股東權(quán)益保護(hù)的必要性[J];黑龍江對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào);2010年09期

5 胡濱,曹順明;股東派生訴訟的合理性基礎(chǔ)與制度設(shè)計(jì)[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年04期

6 耿利航;;群體訴訟與司法局限性——以證券欺詐民事集團(tuán)訴訟為例[J];法學(xué)研究;2006年03期

7 曹理;;評(píng)2005年《公司法》對(duì)股東直接訴訟制度的完善[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

8 惠叢冰;;論股東派生訴訟制度與商業(yè)判斷規(guī)則的衡平[J];人民司法;2006年08期

9 劉曄;;論我國(guó)股東派生訴訟制度的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義及完善[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2010年21期

10 孫英;論股東代表訴訟制度[J];山東大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 本版編輯　劉曉燕 通訊員 唐弦　　;[N];人民法院報(bào);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 張鋒;中小股東權(quán)益訴訟救濟(jì)研究[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

2 許可;股份有限公司股東直接訴訟研究[D];天津商業(yè)大學(xué);2007年

3 許一云;論我國(guó)股東代表訴訟制度的完善[D];安徽大學(xué);2007年

4 管其義;中日股東代表訴訟制度比較研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

5 王嫘;論我國(guó)股份有限公司中小股東權(quán)益的法律保護(hù)[D];四川省社會(huì)科學(xué)院;2008年

6 劉景芝;論我國(guó)股東代表訴訟制度之完善[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

7 張曉飛;論中小股東的保護(hù)[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2008年

8 余曉蕓;股東代位訴訟制度研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2302765