【摘要】：公司股東轉(zhuǎn)讓股權(quán)引發(fā)了很多公司章程修改爭(zhēng)議。本文將以某上市公司為例，討論上市公司發(fā)起股東轉(zhuǎn)讓股權(quán)引發(fā)的公司章程修改爭(zhēng)議問題。除最后一部分結(jié)語以外，本文分以下幾個(gè)部分： 第一部分為引言，列舉本文所討論案例。上市公司發(fā)起人股東轉(zhuǎn)讓其股權(quán)后，受讓股東無法通過股東大會(huì)決議達(dá)成將其持股情況記載于公司章程的目的而要求法院強(qiáng)制公司修改公司章程，法院是否應(yīng)當(dāng)支持。該案例引出的兩個(gè)問題：一個(gè)是該上市公司受讓人股東的訴求如何處理，，涉及對(duì)受讓人要求變更公司章程的訴求的評(píng)判，另一個(gè)是上市公司發(fā)起人轉(zhuǎn)讓股權(quán)后公司章程是否修改、修改程序的問題。 第二部分,對(duì)受讓人要求變更公司章程的訴求的評(píng)判。根據(jù)《公司法》第22條，討論公司股東大會(huì)決議的無效與可撤銷的情況，證明不同情況下本案例中股東大會(huì)決議是否有效，指明案例中原告的請(qǐng)求的處理方式。此外，討論受讓人要求在公司章程中記載其持股信息這一要求本身的不合理,上市公司章程不記載股東持股信息是合理性的選擇。 第三部分,公司章程中有關(guān)發(fā)起人持股信息記載事項(xiàng)的修改問題。因發(fā)起人持股信息的變更而修改公司章程的現(xiàn)行立法，不合理。對(duì)此，一方面可以通過對(duì)《公司法》第81條中要求記載的發(fā)起人身份進(jìn)行限縮解釋，將其限定為公司設(shè)立時(shí)的發(fā)起人；另一方面,可以將其歸入“事實(shí)性事項(xiàng)的變更而引發(fā)的公司章程修改”，簡(jiǎn)化章程修改程序。
[Abstract]:The transfer of shares by the shareholders of the company has caused many disputes over the amendment of the company's articles of association. This paper takes a listed company as an example to discuss the dispute over the modification of the company's articles of association caused by the shareholder's transfer of the equity of the listed company. In addition to the last part of the conclusion, this paper is divided into the following parts: the first part is the introduction, enumerating the cases discussed in this paper. After the sponsors of the listed company transfer their equity, the transferor can not achieve the purpose of recording their shareholdings in the articles of association through the resolution of the shareholders' general meeting, and requests the court to force the company to modify the articles of association, and whether the court should support it. The case raises two questions: one is how to deal with the appeal of the transferee shareholders of the listed company, which involves the judgment of the transferee's request to change the company's articles of association. The other is whether the company's articles of association are modified and the procedures are modified after the sponsors transfer the shares. The second part is the judgment of the transferee's request to change the articles of association. According to Article 22 of the Company Law, this paper discusses the invalidity and revocability of the resolution of the shareholders' general meeting of the company, proves whether the resolution of the shareholders' general meeting in this case is valid under different circumstances, and points out the manner of handling the plaintiff's request in the case. In addition, it is unreasonable for the transferee to require the owner to record its shareholding information in the company's articles of association, and it is a reasonable choice that the listed company's articles of association do not record the shareholder's shareholding information. The third part is about the amendment of the information about the sponsors' shareholding in the articles of association. It is unreasonable to modify the current legislation of the company's articles of association because of the change of the promoters' shareholding information. In this regard, on the one hand, the identity of the initiators required in Article 81 of the Company Law can be interpreted so as to limit it to the promoters at the time of the establishment of the company; on the other hand, It can be classified as "change of articles of association caused by change of fact" and simplify the procedure of amendment of articles of association.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王海平;公司章程性質(zhì)與股東權(quán)益保護(hù)的法理分析[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年03期

2 朱慈蘊(yùn);;公司章程兩分法論——公司章程自治與他治理念的融合[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2006年05期

3 宋從文;;公司章程的合同解讀[J];法律適用;2007年02期

4 錢玉林;;作為裁判法源的公司章程:立法表達(dá)與司法實(shí)踐[J];法商研究;2011年01期

5 石紀(jì)虎;;公司法·公司章程·股東大會(huì)決議——三者效力關(guān)系的“契約論”解讀[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年02期

6 孫英;;論公司章程絕對(duì)必要記載事項(xiàng)與公司無效[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年03期

7 羅澤勝;;新《公司法》對(duì)股東與公司自治的擴(kuò)張與限制[J];法學(xué)家;2006年04期

8 時(shí)建中;;公司法與公司章程在公司治理中的協(xié)調(diào)[J];中國發(fā)展觀察;2006年02期

9 普麗芬;從公司法規(guī)則的分類界定公司章程的邊界[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年03期

10 王保樹;;從法條的公司法到實(shí)踐的公司法[J];法學(xué)研究;2006年06期

本文編號(hào)：2284744