公司債權(quán)人利益保護(hù)的法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析
[Abstract]:The protection of creditors' interests runs through the historical process of company law reform and development, and still attracts the attention of law and economics experts. As shareholders, as one of the investors, the protection of creditors' interests is not only beyond the company law, but also has a deep impact on the efficiency of the company law rules. Under the background that the company law is constantly changing to deal with the complex changing capital market, the design and construction of the legal strategy of creditor's interest protection need to be reviewed and recognized again. The traditional idea of creditor's interest protection, which is based on corporate capital, has gradually withdrawn from the historical stage of company law rule design. Faced with the softened capital rules, the conflicts of interest between creditors and shareholders and executives are becoming more and more intense. The legal strategy to regulate shareholders and executives to abuse their rights and profit and protect the interests of creditors needs to be followed up. In order to reduce the investment cost of creditors, increase their profit, strengthen the company credit and improve the intensity of protecting the interests of creditors, it is the core problem of the current company law rules to protect creditors. The process of various legal strategies acting as a credit enhancement service to the interests of creditors shows that the corporation law has gradually formed an organic legal system framework of internal interaction and vitality for creditors. This article mainly uses the method of law and economics analysis, and at the same time uses many kinds of analysis tools to explain and analyze the logical kernel and system construction of the legal strategy of creditor's interest protection inside and outside the company law of our country. Furthermore, the relationship and mechanism of various legal countermeasures are deeply explored, so as to put forward some suggestions for perfecting the legal countermeasures for the protection of creditors' interests in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2010
【分類號】:D912.29;D90-05
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 趙曉光;深化公司法理論研究,加快公司法改革步伐——讀王慶軍教授《公司法論》[J];徐州工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期
2 胡田野;歐洲公司法最新改革與發(fā)展[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期
3 徐克;英國公司法改革[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)刊;2005年Z1期
4 傅穹;;法定資本制:詮釋、問題、檢討——從公司不同參與人的利益沖突與衡量觀察[J];南京大學(xué)法律評論;2002年01期
5 羅培新;;新《公司法》框架下的司法裁判困境[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期
6 王保樹;競爭與發(fā)展:公司法改革面臨的主題[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2003年03期
7 章曉琴;公司法改革和提高中小企業(yè)競爭力[J];商業(yè)研究;2004年11期
8 張建;;淺析我國公司章程自治[J];商業(yè)文化(上半月);2011年06期
9 王全,張伶;變革中的日本公司法——2001、2002年日本公司法的修改[J];鄭州經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期
10 姚剛;論我國公司法改革及東亞經(jīng)驗(yàn)的借鑒[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)社會體制比較;2003年04期
相關(guān)會議論文 前4條
1 董淳鍔;;公司法實(shí)施的激勵(lì)機(jī)制研究[A];2012年度(第十屆)中國法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)論壇論文集[C];2012年
2 吳越;;公司人格本質(zhì)與社會責(zé)任的三種維度[A];北京論壇(2007)文明的和諧與共同繁榮——人類文明的多元發(fā)展模式:“全球化趨勢中跨國發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略與企業(yè)社會責(zé)任”法學(xué)分論壇論文或摘要集(下)[C];2007年
3 王強(qiáng);;我國關(guān)聯(lián)公司的公司法規(guī)制[A];投資者保護(hù)與公司治理論壇論文集[C];2010年
4 曲振濤;劉文革;;對《公司法》展開經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析的意義[A];《制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)研究》第五輯[C];2004年
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條
1 記者 蔣安杰;公司法改革國際峰會召開[N];法制日報(bào);2006年
2 許暉 郭燕春;公司法改革重在放松管制[N];中國商報(bào);2002年
3 本報(bào)記者 夏麗華 實(shí)習(xí)記者 費(fèi)楊生;世界公司法改革浪潮涌動[N];中國證券報(bào);2006年
4 王健;淺議新《公司法》中的公司資本制度[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2008年
5 本報(bào)記者 蔣安杰 王林清;公司法改革世界矚目[N];法制日報(bào);2006年
6 本報(bào)記者 錢昊e,
本文編號:2267752
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2267752.html